![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 532
|
Laird a Tiger
For two minor league prospects. Detroit sent right-handed pitchers Guillermo Moscoso and Carlos Melo to Texas for Laird, who batted .276 in 344 at-bats last season with 24 doubles, six homers and 41 RBIs.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3753742 Thank goodness. I really was hoping the Reds wouldn't aquire him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Winning the Human Race
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,819
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
For that price, I would have taken him. Drove me crazy to see people bandying about Homer for Laird proposals, however.
__________________
Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,154
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
I really didn't care to acquire Laird, BUT...the reds are said to be "in on" all of these players who are traded and free agaents who are signed, but they lose out every time. It is getting a little bit sickening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,371
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
it's walts job to look at all of the options available but just because a player is considered doesn't mean he would be a fit.
__________________
"Now that's a real shame when folks be throwin' away a perfectly good white boy like that." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wheelersburg, Ohio
Posts: 874
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
I am not really upset by this even though the Reds are in a need of a catcher, whether to start ahead of Hanigan or back him up, they still need one. Laird was a decent option, but I think they can do better. I read on MLBTR that there is some interest in Kelly Shoppach.
If they are set with Hanigan as the starter I could the Josh Bard signing, that was rumored right after the World Series, happening. I think their still feeling out the market for a catcher and if they can get better than Hanigan, they will, if not, they will go with Hanigan and sign a guy like Bard to back-up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,006
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
Pretty much a meaningless trade, I suppose the Tigers need someone since getting rid of Pudge. Didn't they have Inge fill in last year after Ivan left?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,154
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 86
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
i think they should inquire about the cost of Saltalamachia. He is rumored to be available still.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 86
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
There is nothing sickening about this. Laird isn't much better than what we have, he would not have been worth trading for. I also suspect that a lot of the deals you hear the Reds are involved in is nothing more than smoke screens or Walt driving up the price on players. Remember he is a saavy veteran GM. My guess is the deals that will happen are the ones you aren't expecting. Even the Dye deal will probably happen after most of us feel that it fell apart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,125
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
Quote:
Move on, Glad Laird isn't a Red and his probably 3 Million Dollar salary... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 86
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
...the greatest trick the devil ever pulled off, was convincing the world that he didn't exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,154
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 86
|
Re: Laird a Tiger
like i stated in another thread, I honestly believe we end up with Furcal and Dye. I think patience is a virtue. We all want it right now, but usually the longer it takes to get something done the cheaper the player is.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |