![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,407
|
Jake Peavy
I know all about his no-trade clauses, his preferred teams, etc. Now that it appears neither Atlanta nor the Cubs will be trading for him, will he open up his list? Regardless of whether or not he does, suspend disbelief for a minute and assume he's willing to play anywhere. Assume you're Walt- what would be your absolute best offer to Kevin Towers for Jake Peavy at this moment? Assume you get one chance to make your best offer- kind of like an auction. What would it entail? (Try to factor in what the Padres would be interested in)
I'll start: I would give them their choice of any four from the following: Homer Bailey Daryl Thompson Ramon Ramirez Josh Roenicke Zach Stewart Jared Burton Chris Valaika Todd Frazier Drew Stubbs Or if they wanted Encarnacion, I would offer him + any two from above. I wouldn't trade Cueto, Volquez, or Bruce, and I would assume they wouldn't be interested in Votto (because of Gonzalez.)
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Jake Peavy
If the Cubs couldn't make it happen, what makes you think the Reds could make it happen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern KY
Posts: 6,967
|
Re: Jake Peavy
The Reds have chips to trade. I almost think I would trade anyone in the organization for him. The Cubs don't have anything to trade.
__________________
"My mission is to be the ray of hope, the guy who stands out there on that beautiful field and owns up to his mistakes and lets people know it's never completely hopeless, no matter how bad it seems at the time. I have a platform and a message, and now I go to bed at night, sober and happy, praying I can be a good messenger." -Josh Hamilton |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lexington
Posts: 4,949
|
Re: Jake Peavy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Jake Peavy
Quote:
If I'm the Padres, I'm asking for all 4 of those to start, and not trading Peavy to the Reds unless I feel like I've bent Walt over and screwed him with his pants on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lexington
Posts: 4,949
|
Re: Jake Peavy
Quote:
I said I didn't see it happening, but my previous post wasn't really about acquiring him. I was just saying that the Reds could make an offer as attractive as the Cubs made. I'd be willing to give them Francisco, Stubbs, Bailey, and Roenicke. I 'd even offer them another prospect or replace Francisco with Encarnacion. The Padres might not like it and might insist on one of the "big four. " but I believe it would be better than what the Scrubs could offer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 2,732
|
Re: Jake Peavy
Harang is from San Diego!.. Would they Take Harang , Bailey and Roenicke?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lexington
Posts: 4,949
|
Re: Jake Peavy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,989
|
Re: Jake Peavy
I don't believe we have to have him so my offer would reflect that more than the opposite. And let's not forget that you are doing them a big favor as well by taking on all that salary that they can afford but just barely and I'm sure would much rather have the prospects at this point.
Off Limits Volquez Cueto Bruce Votto Frazier Alonso Soto Burton I'd offer them a fair but unspectacular deal, but suited to fit their needs with a little work on their part. What they desperately need for that Organization is: A CF who can cover ground and who could potentially hit for power. Check: Drew Stubbs A power arm that might be able to replace Peavy at some point. Check: Homer Bailey A solid SS option that can hit and field. Check: Chris Valaika A guy who could eventually hit for power even there. Check: Juan Francisco An option that can be a bridge to Valaika at SS Check: Alex Gonzales (Or Kepp if I must) What I want: Jake Peavy & Brian Giles I don't expect them to bite perse but again 4 of our top 10-15 prospects is a solid offer and guys who fit their needs and we are taking on significant salary. If they want a 5th prospect maybe a Matt Maloney or a Sean Watson or the like I would go that much further but that's it. Them taking on Gonzo isn't necc. a deal breaker but I will try to make them feel like it unless they press me to the wall on the issue then I would send them Keppinger instead. I'd then turn and explore an Arroyo to Atlanta deal for Escobar or to Texas for an Andrus or Cruz based deal.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,666
|
Re: Jake Peavy
The Cubs look like they are gearing up for a move now.
They traded Marquis for Luis Vizcaino saved some bucks and deepened the pen. They signed Aaron Miles as IF depth. They dealt Mark Derosa to Cle for three pitching prospects. I wonder if the next move isn't Peavey. They have more pitching prospects to trade. They can move a pen arm with Vizcaino on board and have opened a rotation spot with Marquis gone. Hmmm?
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,687
|
Re: Jake Peavy
Quote:
It's been reported that the pitchers coming to Chicago are going to the Pads as part of the Peavy deal. Otherwise, the Derosa deal is senseless. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,687
|
Re: Jake Peavy
Quote:
A $23M per year Peavy simply doesn't have that kind of value, especially when there are rumours of a possible injury. He's worth some prospects, but not worth clearing out the cupboard of our very best prospects. look what kind of crap the Cubs have been offering. What is Towers going to say? You either give me Votto, Bruce, Volquez and Cueto, or I'm trading Peavy to the Cubs for a bunch of crap? Towers is not in a position of stength. We say that last year when the Twins were desperately trying to find someone to take Santana, who's a better pitcher than Peavy. When Peavy is traded (and he will be) it will be for much less than what the Reds could have given. But a $23M Peavy isn't worth Fraizer, Bailey, Stubbs and Burton, or whatever. Not for any team with a payroll of less than $100M. When Peavy gets traded, it will be Tower who looks like he got screwed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: Jake Peavy
The Cubs farm system is awful. They have maybe one very good prospect and that's Josh Vitters. Any deal involving Peavy to the Cubs will be an awful trade for the Padres IMO.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,666
|
Re: Jake Peavy
Quote:
2009 - $8 Million 2010 - $15 Million 2011 - $16 Million 2012 - $17 Million 2013 - $22 Million or a $4 Million buy-out. That's not bad. I'd go Bailey, Valaika, Thompson, Roenicke, Stubbs, Frazier and Francisco for him. Then I'd consder dealing Arroyo for position help. You'd actually save money in 09 and not take a huge hit in 2010.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,477
|
Re: Jake Peavy
Quote:
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |