![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Amarillo,Texas
Posts: 3,997
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Kiper has the top 3 WRs coming off the board by the time the Bears pick at #18. As Bears fans, we should hope that Florida's Percy Harvin doesn't go to the Jets at #17 as predicted by Mel.
Last edited by AmarilloRed; 01-26-2009 at 12:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Miami Redhawks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Quote:
I agree with most of what you wrote, but Ghiacuic is really bad. Like you said, he stinks at blocking for the run, and I believe he's just as bad pass-blocking. It got so comical last year that I would spend time during a game counting how many times Ghiacuic got trampled by a D-Lineman. Ghiacuic, at best, should be a backup. He is the main reason why the offensive is so poor. They must get a bigger better center this offseason to have any chance of having a successful offense next year.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421 www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West-central Ohio
Posts: 1,912
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,007
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
I can't get behind any idea that has them bringing back essentially the same poor offensive line they fielded last year - particularly the "center piece" of it.
I'm also not convinced Antwan Odom is a difference maker at DE, despite being paid as one. Like most, I was concerned that he benefited in 2007 playing on the same DL as two Pro Bowlers and last year did nothing to ease those concerns. If I'm the Bengals, one of my top priorities needs to figure out why Robert Geathers's play has dropped off the past two years. Here's a guy who had 10.5 sacks in 2006, was rewarded with a lucrative contract extension and has been a non-factor rushing the passer the past two years. I understand that sacks aren't everything, and QB pressures can be equally effective, but I don't see him (or anyone) consistently get pressure on opposing QBs. Sure, having better DTs would help him and everyone else, but he didn't have much to work with there in 2006, either, and he still had a very nice year. I just hope it wasn't a career year due in part to playing for an extension. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Miami Redhawks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Quote:
I believe their D-Line is a bunch of average players, no difference makers. Not one guy on that line demands a double-team. I truely believe that if they Bengals can get one stud on that line it would make a world of difference. And it could be at any position, not necessarily an end.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421 www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Quote:
Personally I am no fan of Ghiacuic but he's ranked higher than most FA center's. I do think people are overstating his lack of ability at pass blocking I happen to think he's good enough there. But I do agree he is the worst lineman we have (when all are healthy).
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
I wish we would've kept Steinbach and converted him full time to a center.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Quote:
On Geathers I think as Redhook eluded to his '07 you can't really blame on him as he played LB and DT along with DE that season. And he was also hurt for part of this past season so I'm not sure we need to look beyond those 2 issues. But here's a possibility, it's hard to pin your ears back and get after the QB when your offense has the ball for very little time and isn't doing anything with it when they do. He had 2.5 sacks, 12 hurries and 56 tackles in 11 games (games 1-11).
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Keeping Steinbach was my 1st thought as well. I wanted to sign him and then whoever else between Williams and Willie. The guy is an excellent pulling guard, darn near prototypical LG. But yeah we then could have moved him to Center where he would have held his own.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: End of the bench
Posts: 738
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Quote:
__________________
"Hyperbole is the greatest thing ever" Redsland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
I'd like to know how many minutes the Bengals had a lead while he was healthy in 2008. He rarely had opportunities to pressure the QB. Basically I'm not worried about him. They've got other holes to fill
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,029
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
Quote:
Last edited by icehole3; 01-26-2009 at 06:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
I'd be happy with the off season if;
1. Re sign Benson 2. Sign Birk 3. Draft a Tackle and a Center high in the draft(in the first three rounds.) 4. Trade Chad Ocho Cinco In my mind, if there's a decent line in front of him, Carson can throw to anyone. With that in mind, I think fewer dollars need to be spent on WR's(I'm okay with letting TJ go too, though I'd prefer to keep him.)
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,029
|
Re: Mel Kiper's Big Board
a couple of free agent center rankings
http://www.walterfootball.com/freeagents2009C.php http://cin.scout.com/a.z?s=117&p=9&c...83&rc=16&pid=9 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |