![]() |
|
|
#661 |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,099
|
Re: 2009 MLB draft
The thing about White that concerns me is his K rate and BB rate have stayed the same since last year AND he has been hit harder. 10 HR's given up this year, opposed to 5 HR's last year.
Hopefully he's facing better competition, but I'm still not blown away with this pick. And if Crow or Matzek was available, I'm actually less than thrilled. Last edited by BuckeyeRedleg; 06-09-2009 at 05:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#662 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: 2009 MLB draft
I still dont think they pass on Crow unless his demands are even higher than last years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#663 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,660
|
Re: 2009 MLB draft
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#664 | |
|
Socratic Gadfly
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
|
Re: 2009 MLB draft
Quote:
Very well put. While Crow and Matzek may rank higher on the draft board, I don't see how they are sure things, or so much higher that it's crazy to pick anyone else, especially when the money is factored in. I have a feeling all teams are realizing that the draft is such a crap shoot, that unless the guy is really can't miss, or leagues better than any other option, it does not make sense to brake the bank to sign them. I thinkthe Reds feel that since the talent difference between White and Crow/Maztek is not as great as the money difference, might as well draft the cheaper guy and spend the money on something of a more certain value. Remember that only around 65% of top 10 picks even make it to the majors.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#665 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Memphis
Posts: 754
|
Re: 2009 MLB draft
Alex White probably is going to get more money than Aaron Crow. The Reds probably have White higher on their board than Crow. BA has White ranked #6 and Crow ranked #7, I'm just not understanding how picking White is going cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#666 |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,938
|
Re: 2009 MLB draft
That's a good point. This truly might not be a signability issue. Matzek, one might say, could have more physical potential, but being a high school pitcher and also having question-marks about his attitude might put him lower on the Reds' board. Though his money demands might be a factor, it might not be the main factor.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
#667 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: 2009 MLB draft
Quick final pre-draft thoughts:
Leake and Scheppers are the two college pitchers I like best (now that Gibson's injured). Bobby Borchering interests me quite a bit. If you're going to draft a HS arm, let it be Tyler Matzek or Jacob Turner. Yet my pick would be Grant Green if I were the Reds (or Donovan Tate if he drops). Andrew Oliver would be my sleeper.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#668 |
|
Puffy 3:16
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Panama City Beach
Posts: 13,669
|
Re: 2009 MLB draft
Grant Green would be my pick as well.
But its going to be Minor, imo.
__________________
"I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum." - - Rowdy Roddy Piper "It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. I am not a big man" - - Fletch |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |