![]() |
|
|
#166 |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,987
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
The injuries were just too plentiful to reach my magic number of 78 (IIRC, too lazy to look). I still think they wind up close enough that the lost wins due to injury could have bridged it to 78.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,815
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
Every Club has to deal with injuries.
I actually thought the pitching would be better than it has been. I knew from the get go the offense and Dusty were bound to fail. Lord Have Mercy! I'd be happy with 3 or 4 wins a week from here on out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,342
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
I'm still feeling good about 74 wins, though I may have been too much of a kool aid drinker.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,826
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
Looks like my 78 prediction is way too optimistic. It will certainly be lower next season.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
If the Reds lose today and finish with 77 wins, the following people correctly picked 77:
*BaseClogger 77 BuckeyeRedleg 77 Cyclone 792 77 boognish 77 If the Reds beat up on the mighty might Pirates and pull off the win that will propel us to greatness in 2010, leaving us with 78 for this season, the following people correctly picked 78: gonelong 78 edabbs44 78 cumberlandreds 78 BRM 78 kbrake 78 Mario-Rijo 78 Red in Chicago 78 HumnHilghtFreel 78 Boss-Hog 78 GoReds33 78 Stormy 78 In honor of gonelong, let's see the Reds get that W, so his 78 comes true |
|
|
|
|
|
#172 |
|
Dented and Spent
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,533
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
It's amazing to me that they've won 77 games.
At mid season it looked as if my 70 win prediction was too optimistic. I ain't exactly going ape excrement over it, though.
__________________
"Opening Day.... Pfffft! We get all excited, thinking they're gonna have some kinda great year....Same thing over and over. Disappointment. What time do you want me to come over?" - My Dad. Opening Day 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
High five!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 6,761
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
Don't forget my +/-10 game spread!
__________________
"Bring on Rod Stupid!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,905
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
So close... I had us at 79.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
Danger is my business!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Back in Florida
Posts: 7,842
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
Like wheels', my 71 were looking optimistic when the team was 51-71. Quite a tear since then.
2009 was truly a "tale of two teams". This team is quite different without Taveras, Encarnacion, Gonzalez and some of the other departed/wounded. (yes probably even Harang). I still think team Aug-Sep would be even better without Duhsty./ deadhorse
__________________
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it." http://dalmady.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
I predicted 83 wins. If the Reds hadn't been devastated by injuries then they may have reach 83.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#177 | |
|
Socratic Gadfly
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
Quote:
So it seems like your prediction was real close.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,905
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
Of course, if Taveras had stayed healthy we might not have reached 75.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
High five!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 6,761
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
Heh!
__________________
"Bring on Rod Stupid!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: 2009 - Gonelong's 8th annual Season Ws prediction thread ..
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |