![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,928
|
Race for No. 2
San Fransciso (88-68)
San Diego (87-68) Cincinnati (87-69) Atlanta (87-69) The Braves aren't likely to win the division, so they're essentially out for the No. 2 seed. It's become a 3-team race. Schedules: Cincinnati: vs. HOU (3 games); vs. MIL (3 games) San Fran: vs. ARI (3 games); vs. SD (3 games) San Diego: vs. CHI (4 games); @ SF (3 games) Atlanta: vs. FLA (3 games); vs. PHI (3 games) The Phillies cannot play the Braves in the first round and the Giants could not play the Padres. That San Francisco and San Diego play each other this weekend could help the Reds get the second-best record, assuming neither get a sweep. That's of course provided the Reds take care of business. If the wildcard comes out of the West, Philadelphia will play that team (which could still be Colorado, though their chances really took a hit this weekend). If it's the Braves, Philadelphia will play the third division winner. Will be an interesting week. If the Reds win their last six games, they have an excellent shot at opening the playoffs hosting games. If they lose one, they're still in OK shape. Losing two or more might send them to Philadelphia, unless the wildcard comes out of the West.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,890
|
Re: Race for No. 2
The club should rest some players after clinching the division. I know the tendancy is to want to go all out and try to gain a seeding advantage. But, who is to say a few fresh players replacing some fatigued "starters" wouldn't give them a better chance to win out anyway? I wouldn't want to see three straight days in which over half the lineup is populated with bench players. But, there should be an opportunity to rest one or two a night for the next week and still put a good enough lineup together to win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,013
|
Re: Race for No. 2
Quote:
__________________
"Today was the byproduct of us thinking we can come back from anything." - Joey Votto after blowing a 10-1 lead and holding on for the 12-11 win on 8/25/2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
#TheReturn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,659
|
Re: Race for No. 2
Quote:
However, as soon as the Reds clinch they need to try to lineup their rotation for the first round. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
2 in 3 years!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: Race for No. 2
Quote:
320
__________________
I'd rather listen to Kelch read the phone book than suffer through Thom Brennaman's attempt to make every instance on the field the most important event since the discovery of manned space flight. -westofyou |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
I thought you'd be bigger
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Green Country
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Race for No. 2
A little rest would be nice for some (Rolen, Cabrera), but this team hasn't played the best brand of baseball this month. If nothing else, I think Dusty has to keep a few of the regulars (BP, Gomes) in there every day as they try and find their stroke.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Indianapolis, Ind.
Posts: 2,784
|
Re: Race for No. 2
The first round goes 2-2-1 with the home team getting games #1, 2 and 5 at home, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,007
|
Re: Race for No. 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,638
|
Re: Race for No. 2
Here's my chance for this rant.
It makes no sense to penalize other division winners with the potential of playing the #1 seed because the WC happened to come out of the same division. Basically, baseball said that its more important to not have teams from the same division play in the first round of the playoffs than for division winners to get priority, which is wrong. Sounds like a rule to make sure that the Yankees and Red Sox don't meet before the ALCS.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |