|
06-03-2009, 07:22 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 716
|
Nate mcclouth
Traded to braves for 3 prospects
|
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 07:39 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,118
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
Braves Acquire Nate McLouth
By Tim Dierkes [June 3 at 6:10pm CST] According to Dejan Kovacevic of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Braves acquired Nate McLouth from the Pirates today. Dave O'Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution says the Braves are sending three prospects to the Pirates for him. MLB.com's Mark Bowman names them: starters Jeff Locke and Charlie Morton and center fielder Gorkys Hernandez. McLouth is signed through 2011 with a 2012 club option on an extension agreed to in February. This is probably not what he had in mind upon signing the deal, but the Pirates couldn't resist. Morton is big league ready, while Locke and Hernandez, also highly regarded, are further off. Andrew McCutchen will join the Bucs to replace McLouth in center field. |
|
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 07:40 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,118
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
What are the Pirates doing?
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 07:46 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,006
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
Contract this team asap.
ARamirez, Bay, McClouth????? |
|
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 07:58 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 716
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
i think they are selling high from a position they feel they have depth in. Good move imo. mclouth is a nice player but he isnt a cornerstone. Looks like they got back some good young talent.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 08:37 PM
|
#6 |
|
The Future is Now
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,899
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
I think they sold him because he's not as nice of a player with his numbers at 27 as he would be at 22 or 23. They're not gonna be any good in the window he's locked up for (although his 3 year contract extension recently does have me scratching my head)... and fellas, lets remember. It's the Pirates. This is what they do.
__________________
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4 2013 Attendance Record: 5-1 |
|
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 08:39 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 91
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
Actually I like this trade for the Pirates... A lot of his hitting is thanks to that RF in PNC Park. For example all of his homeruns this year. That .176 away from home looks a little scruffy.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 10:12 PM
|
#8 |
|
The Future is Now
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,899
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
Anyone know anything about the three prospects the Buccos received?
__________________
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4 2013 Attendance Record: 5-1 |
|
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 10:52 PM
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,325
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
He was expendable and his value was at its highest. Perfect time to trade him considering Andrew McCutcheon was dying to be called up.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 11:00 PM
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
He is pretty overrated and should have never won a GG, but I think the braves stole the guy for what they gave up.
|
|
|
|
|
06-04-2009, 12:02 AM
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 86
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
Horrible CF. Ranked 35th in =/- in the fielding bible last year and right now is 29th.
I think Pit sold high on him. McLouth is a good COF, but not the amazing CF everyone hypes him as. The sad thing is that he is going to easily be the best player in that OF in Atlanta. |
|
|
|
|
06-04-2009, 01:10 AM
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond, KY
Posts: 1,002
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
His bat could have helped this Reds team a lot.
|
|
|
|
06-04-2009, 08:18 AM
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West-central Ohio
Posts: 1,919
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
I like the trade for the Pirates too. I've never been that enamored with McClouth either, and now they have a reason to play McCutchen everyday.
|
|
|
|
|
06-04-2009, 10:13 AM
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,127
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
Great move for the Pirates. I lol at all of the people ripping them... They free'd up a spot for McCutchen, as well as getting 2-3 very solid prospects in return.
__________________
2010 Mock Draft Selections (picking for Rays) Bryce Brentz Brandon Workman Kris Bryant Matt Lipka Rick Hague |
|
|
|
|
06-04-2009, 02:57 PM
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond, KY
Posts: 1,002
|
Re: Nate mcclouth
No disrespect intended here, but "freeing up a spot" is one of the worst reasons for ever making a trade. If they like what they got in return, fine, but don't throw that rationale out there. Nate McLouth can play anywhere in the OF. They didn't need to "free up a spot" for McCutchen.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Linear Mode
