![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,117
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
There is more than a little doubt in my mind that the BBWA would vote him into the HoF even if he were elgible.
About the only baseball job I can even remotely see him having is going around to teams to give an anti-gambling talk.
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Amarillo,Texas
Posts: 3,997
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
I saw on Sportcenter that Pete would not be allowed to manage, even if he was reinstated. I think a coaching position or scouting job would still be possible, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
Quote:
As for the second issue of Pete benig involved in baseball -- he's 68 years old. When you couple his age with his baggage, I don't see any team ever giving him a job of consequence in baseball again. It's not like he was a great, game-changing manager to begin with. At most, it'd be something like a roving hitting instructor, where he'd have little opportunity to damage the sport. I'm by no means a Rose supporter or a Rose kool-aid drinker, but I agree that the punishment has been served. Twenty years away banishment is more than enough for the crime he committed, IMO. Baseball gains nothing by having him die an outcast, and stands to gain at least something (even if it's just some good feelnigs and a truckload of PR) from welcoming him back to the game.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Haunted by walks
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 6,297
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
Meet your new broadcast team of Marty, Thom, Cowboy, Jim, George, Chris and Pete.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
Quote:
Forget about the team on the field, make sure you watch Pete Rose broadcasting Reds games. At least, that would seem to be the place where he could give the franchise its biggest boost.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,918
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
If reinstated, Pete should never be in a position to influence the outcome of a game. Be it a manager, coach, or anything else, it cannot be allowed to happen.
__________________
Pessimists are well informed optimists |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Beer is good!!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,117
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
If Pete is ever reinstated he will go wherever the money is whether it is in broadcasting, coaching or being a beer vendor. Judging from Pete's past, if the money is right he will do anything.
__________________
"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Haunted by walks
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 6,297
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
I have to admit I'd rather see Pete on ESPN than Jim Bowden or Steve Phillips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
On the brink of disaster
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 627
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
I feel like many others that he should be reinstated. He should be in the HOF because he was one of the best players in the game. Where I see the biggest split is whether he should be allowed to coach again. I think he should be allowed to do what many other former players are doing such as being an extra coach in spring training and a roving instructor just because he would not have a big impact on the outcome of a game but could help repair some damage he has done to himself by helping out the young players who could really benefit from his experience. I really feel it would be a waste to have someone of his knowledge not be able to spread it on to this generation of players. He has been punished, but should also have some restrictions to protect baseball from being tarnished further. I think this means no permanent position with a big league club, but not necessarily no affiliation at all.
__________________
"I thought I'd get your theories, mock them, then embrace my own. The usual." -- House "You guys are still thinking like doctors when you should be thinking like plumbers. Come on, I wanna see some butt crack." -- House |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | ||
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,337
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Haunted by walks
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 6,297
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
Worst-case scenario, Pete becomes a spring training instructor, things seem to be going OK, but he attracts a young ballplayer or two with the same proclivities and the mess begins again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,027
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
I'd like to see Shoeless Joe reinstated too, like Hank Aaron said, we've all made mistakes, let the guys in the Hall, it's good for baseball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: Selig mulling pardon for Rose
No to managing, but I'd be fine if they would let him be a hitting coach or even a roving hitting coach or maybe just being allowed to come to Spring Training to teach hitting fundamentals ...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |