RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2009, 01:04 AM   #1
HalMorrisRules
He sure could hit
 
HalMorrisRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 701
Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Defending The Trade

Look further down into the posts below and what he thinks the Reds possibilities are for the offseason. Interesting if nothing else.
HalMorrisRules is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 08-06-2009, 01:15 AM   #2
Captain Hook
Member
 
Captain Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,022
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

I was seconds away from starting the same thread.

I can't believe someone that's not a Reds fans is saying that the Reds could likely contend in the central next year.I mean I think they can but I'm an idiot Reds fan.

Also, I saw where Fay says that Bob C. gave Baker the good old vote of confidence for 2010.What a surprise.Maybe I'll change my mind about us contending next year.
__________________
Captain Hook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 01:21 AM   #3
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

So where are we going to get the 25 million to sign the guys hes discussing?

We wont do anything next year unless we trip over a pile of cash.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 01:28 AM   #4
Captain Hook
Member
 
Captain Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,022
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by GIDP View Post
So where are we going to get the 25 million to sign the guys hes discussing?

We wont do anything next year unless we trip over a pile of cash.
The only hope that I have is that I honestly don't think that Bob C. would put his dude through another season like this where Baker had very little to work with.Baker needs some fire power to overcome his poor managing.I can't imagine anyone thinks that Baker can win with the kind of team we have had this year.The Rolen deal somewhat supports this thinking.I do believe that there is a ray of hope we add some payroll and go after a few of the guys mentioned in this article.I'm not holding my breathe though.
__________________
Captain Hook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 09:01 AM   #5
Newman4
Old Red Guard Reject
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,419
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Guys on here could write better articles than that. He screwed up the math and tried to put it as Rolen is cheaper than Edwin (as noted by the comments by readers). Then the fantasy FA bonanza is comical. Still misses the point - it's not about Edwin v. Rolen - it's THE PROSPECTS they gave up!
__________________
If you ain't first, you're last! - Ricky Bobby
Newman4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 09:24 AM   #6
bigredbunter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ashland, Ohio
Posts: 147
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newman4 View Post
Guys on here could write better articles than that. He screwed up the math and tried to put it as Rolen is cheaper than Edwin (as noted by the comments by readers). Then the fantasy FA bonanza is comical. Still misses the point - it's not about Edwin v. Rolen - it's THE PROSPECTS they gave up!
Neither of which (as he pointed out) were likely to help the Reds in 2010.
bigredbunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 09:34 AM   #7
texasdave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,530
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

The author makes this statement:

Quote:
Losing Edison Volquez to Tommy John surgery was a major blow, but to compete next year, Roenicke and Stewart weren't going to help.
It is my contention that if the Reds are going to be a factor in 2010 that Roenicke and Stewart will HAVE TO contribute. Or rather, now that they are history, would have had to contribute.
texasdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 11:36 AM   #8
bigredbunter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ashland, Ohio
Posts: 147
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by texasdave View Post
The author makes this statement:



It is my contention that if the Reds are going to be a factor in 2010 that Roenicke and Stewart will HAVE TO contribute. Or rather, now that they are history, would have had to contribute.


Roenicke = league average bullpen arm

If we can't scrape one of those together from either the system or FA, then the problems are bigger than losing Roenicke.



Stewart = lottery ticket

If you play enough I suppose you'll win...But, it's groundhog day with the Reds organization and lottery tickets...Last year, it pinned their hopes on Bailey...How's that turning out?

Before that a slew of supposed saviors. Next year, there will be the next Stewart. It never ends.
bigredbunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 12:46 PM   #9
BLEEDS
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigredbunter View Post
Roenicke = league average bullpen arm

If we can't scrape one of those together from either the system or FA, then the problems are bigger than losing Roenicke.



Stewart = lottery ticket

If you play enough I suppose you'll win...But, it's groundhog day with the Reds organization and lottery tickets...Last year, it pinned their hopes on Bailey...How's that turning out?

Before that a slew of supposed saviors. Next year, there will be the next Stewart. It never ends.
I agree 99%.

Roenicke has had his chances, and he's not exactly a Prospect anymore, he's 27.

I'll give some on Stewart.
It seems that Stewart did make a fast rise this year in the Reds program, but I still say he's a PROSPECT and nothing from a sure thing.
Like you said, we'll have another one next year.

The consensus seems to be, yeah he's a good Prospect, and TORONTO will develop him into a great pitcher (since we can't seem to make ice cubes with water and a fridge), so in that regard he should have been considered worth more in a trade.
Who knows.

I am probably on an island but I really like Leake and think he's going to be the next big thing.
We still have Wood, JC Sulberan (sp?) and a slew of other SP prospects that were more highly regarded just 3 months ago.

Could we have got more, not sure, they sure kicked in a lot of salary along with Rolen so we were going to have to give up something.
Personally I can live with it. I think Rolen brings A LOT to the Reds, on and off the field.
I think he's going to flourish in GABP at the plate, and his GG D is really a Ridiculously HUGE upgrade from what we've had there the past 3 years.

PEACE

-BLEEDS
__________________
I think that in a year or two, one of these guys - Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, Stubbs - will be ready to replace Dunn. They won't hit as many home runs as Dunn, but they should have similar OPS. - 757690, July 22, 2008

Alonso will be playing 1B for the REDS and batting 4th one year from today. - Kingspoint, July 9, 2009
BLEEDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 01:14 PM   #10
Moosie52
Member
 
Moosie52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 563
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

I for one am glad Edwin is gone.
Moosie52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 02:56 PM   #11
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Josh didnt start pitching till he was 24. I think its safe to say he really didnt get his chances yet.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 03:19 PM   #12
malcontent
malingered here too long
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,980
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by GIDP View Post
Josh didnt start pitching till he was 24. I think its safe to say he really didnt get his chances yet.
Wish more people would check out his history and numbers.

He's really getting his first shot now, with the Blue Jays.
malcontent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 11:38 AM   #13
Newman4
Old Red Guard Reject
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,419
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigredbunter View Post
Roenicke = league average bullpen arm

If we can't scrape one of those together from either the system or FA, then the problems are bigger than losing Roenicke.



Stewart = lottery ticket

If you play enough I suppose you'll win...But, it's groundhog day with the Reds organization and lottery tickets...Last year, it pinned their hopes on Bailey...How's that turning out?

Before that a slew of supposed saviors. Next year, there will be the next Stewart. It never ends.
Care to explain why you project Roenicke as a league average bullpen arm? As for Stewart, what more could he do besides reach AAA as a 22 yr. old with outstanding numbers all along the way?
__________________
If you ain't first, you're last! - Ricky Bobby
Newman4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 11:40 AM   #14
Newman4
Old Red Guard Reject
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,419
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigredbunter View Post
Neither of which (as he pointed out) were likely to help the Reds in 2010.
Really? Considering Roenicke was on the roster this year, I would imagine he would definitely be in the plans for the next. Stewart was expected to possibly come up in the pen this year as well.
__________________
If you ain't first, you're last! - Ricky Bobby
Newman4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 01:55 PM   #15
bigredbunter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ashland, Ohio
Posts: 147
Re: Hardball Times defends the Rolen Trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newman4 View Post
Care to explain why you project Roenicke as a league average bullpen arm? As for Stewart, what more could he do besides reach AAA as a 22 yr. old with outstanding numbers all along the way?

Didn't mean to ignore the question...It's taken a couple of days...I should say that mediocre bullpen arm is a likely future for Roenicke over the next 2-3 years for many of the reasons that other posters have commented on... Roenicke was 25 when he reached AAA ball, after a very slow start in Billings (he was wild) and several injuries. As a result, Roenicke really didn't break into the majors until this year (he had a cup of coffee in 2008. In his favor, he seems to have found the strikezone consistently. He also seems to get hit at a fairly regular rate, though, this hasn't pulled down his era or whip to this point. To be fair, though, we're talking about 20 innings of pro ball over 2 seasons...That's all the exposure Roenicke has. What is likely, is that as he ages and as teams see him more frequently, he will get at even higher rates than he already is (10 Hs per 9IP).

As for Stewart, there are lots of lottery tickets (22 year olds) who put up good minor league numbers and then fizzle. There are some lottery tickets who are winners. I really hope that Jocketty sold the right ticket. I don't know---But the point is, that no one else really does either. I'm not opposed to selling tickets or keeping them....But I think it's silly to manage a farm system by the maxim "keep all thy lottery tickets." That's what gets me about the rage over trading Stewart....He was a ticket, a chit, a possibility--nothing more. It will come out in the wash as to whether Jocketty (on the advice of his organizational people) managed to sell the right one.
bigredbunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25