RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-25-2009, 02:33 PM   #31
flyer85
He has the Evil Eye!
 
flyer85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
In the end Smith becomes the real loser the longer the hold out extends.
that remains to be seen. However, he is certainly taking on risk at this point.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand
flyer85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 08-25-2009, 02:34 PM   #32
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

If what Reedy's reporting is correct, the Bengals aren't even matching what the #6 pick in the draft last year got. The heck with slotting, what basis are the Bengals using for their numbers?
Hoosier Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:37 PM   #33
DTCromer
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,325
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Signing Andre Smith for $1 would've been a waste of money. Aside from the fact that he's a fat slob, what else would he offer the team? His strong suit isn't even as a pass blocker and that was the Bengals main concern. He's a head case and everyone knew it.

The blame falls squarely on the Bengals.
DTCromer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:37 PM   #34
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Screwball View Post
Didn't Keels say on Hard Knocks they wanted a little over what DHB got from the Raiders, and Katie said they're "not prepared to meet that"?

While it sucks Al Davis is clearly insane, this is how it is. Either pay the man his slot money, or punish the team by not doing so. They're not going to get away with their lowball offer.
They obviously want more than what DHB got and thats fair its just a matter of how much more. Is it 25 million guaranteed what? 2 picks behind Smith went another OT and he only got 19.2 mill. Why should DHB deal effect how much Smith is getting. DHB got 4 million more than the pick behind him. No other draft pick recieved more than 4 million other than Curry and Stafford and thats because they signed a 6 year deal instead of 5.

It all depends on where each side views the slot and with Smith holding out I would think the Bengals have a legit argument for holding firmer and firmer. The more he holds out the less value he is to the bengals this year so why should they be giving in when they are actually losing money on investment.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:38 PM   #35
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
If what Reedy's reporting is correct, the Bengals aren't even matching what the #6 pick in the draft last year got. The heck with slotting, what basis are the Bengals using for their numbers?
I have a feeling Reedy is getting his info from Keels. Im quite sure he isnt getting it from the Bengals.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:50 PM   #36
LoganBuck
I hate the Cubs
 
LoganBuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,580
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by GIDP View Post
I have a feeling Reedy is getting his info from Keels. Im quite sure he isnt getting it from the Bengals.
I wouldn't be surprised if Keels' meeting with the Bengals doesn't end up on Hard Knocks. Reedy's sources are more likely to be from within the Bengals. We aren't talking about national security here.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor
LoganBuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 03:01 PM   #37
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by DTCromer View Post
Signing Andre Smith for $1 would've been a waste of money. Aside from the fact that he's a fat slob, what else would he offer the team? His strong suit isn't even as a pass blocker and that was the Bengals main concern. He's a head case and everyone knew it.

The blame falls squarely on the Bengals.
He's a fat slob who SEC ends and linebackers took 3 days to get around.
Hoosier Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 03:04 PM   #38
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoganBuck View Post
I wouldn't be surprised if Keels' meeting with the Bengals doesn't end up on Hard Knocks. Reedy's sources are more likely to be from within the Bengals. We aren't talking about national security here.
Reedy sources are probably pretty limited inside the Bengals. I doubt many people other than the Browns and Keels are in the negotiations.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 03:12 PM   #39
Highlifeman21
Member
 
Highlifeman21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by DTCromer View Post
Signing Andre Smith for $1 would've been a waste of money. Aside from the fact that he's a fat slob, what else would he offer the team? His strong suit isn't even as a pass blocker and that was the Bengals main concern. He's a head case and everyone knew it.

The blame falls squarely on the Bengals.
I was surprised when the Bengals drafted Smith, to say the least.

While we certainly needed an OT, Smith wasn't the guy, IMO.

With the 6th pick, there were plenty of better athletes on the board that played other positions than OT.

Such as:

Eugene Monroe (although he shouldn't have been a top 10, IMO)
BJ Raji
Michael Crabtree
Aaron Maybin
Brian Orakpo (the guy I really wanted the Bengals to take)
Malcolm Jenkins
Jeremy Maclin
Percy Harvin


If we really had our heart set on an OT, then we could have traded down to take Eugene Monroe, or Michael Oher. We certainly didn't need to waste the 6th pick on Andre Smith.
Highlifeman21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 03:18 PM   #40
Screwball
Boom Goes the Dynamite
 
Screwball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chester
Posts: 2,406
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Andre Smith was easily one of the most talented tackles in the entire draft. In fact, many were saying he was as talented as the #2 overall pick, Jason Smith, but fell due to the dreaded "character concerns" (mainly his debacle at the combine).
Screwball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 03:22 PM   #41
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Screwball View Post
Andre Smith was easily one of the most talented tackles in the entire draft. In fact, many were saying he was as talented as the #2 overall pick, Jason Smith, but fell due to the dreaded "character concerns" (mainly his debacle at the combine).
.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 03:44 PM   #42
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,611
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Keels is making a contradictary argument. He wants "slot" money but he is using two players that blew "slow" away. Sanchez got a deal that is given to a franchise QB. Those are known to be higher than "slot" but is expected when you think a QB will be your franchise QB. DHB got an insane deal from an insane man that blew "slot" out of the water again.
bucksfan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 03:58 PM   #43
UKFlounder
Go Reds Go!
 
UKFlounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,823
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Those 2 deals simply created a new "slot" and the Bengals were not prepared for other teams to be willing to sign players so soon. They could have been more agreesive in trying to sign Smith, but they waited for the market to set the price, and not that it has, they're still unable to make a deal.

Just because the slotting number was increased by those other teams does not mean the system changed

If the 6th pick getting more money that the 7th pick is such a difficult concept for this organization, that might explain their track record.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
Keels is making a contradictary argument. He wants "slot" money but he is using two players that blew "slow" away. Sanchez got a deal that is given to a franchise QB. Those are known to be higher than "slot" but is expected when you think a QB will be your franchise QB. DHB got an insane deal from an insane man that blew "slot" out of the water again.
UKFlounder is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 04:09 PM   #44
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

DHB and Sanchez were the 1st couple picks to sign so I dont really buy into the notion that this was all avoidable if they would have just been proactive. Dlus the dude didnt even have an agent till something like May 28th. Sanchez signed on the 10 of June. There was no chance the Bengals were going to beat that date.

Both sides should be looking at Monroes contract not Sanchez and DHB.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 07:02 PM   #45
ochre
Member
 
ochre's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,266
Re: Mike Brown Article on ESPN.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Screwball View Post
Andre Smith was easily one of the most talented tackles in the entire draft. In fact, many were saying he was as talented as the #2 overall pick, Jason Smith, but fell due to the dreaded "character concerns" (mainly his debacle at the combine).
I'd say his decision to go shirtless for his school's pro-day was probably not a good move from a "winning the minds and hearts" of the draft projection crowd.

My guess is, the Bengals saw blue-light special, while Smith's camp figured he was prime-rib. That, and what's a Bengal pre-season without a first round Smith hold out?
__________________
4009


ochre is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25