![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Just The Big Picture
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 6,150
|
Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
We have a thread running about Bengals-Steelers history, but since that may be one that we will want to revive in the future, let's start a new thread pertaining to this Sunday's game, in particular.
Just a couple articles to get the conversation started: ![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
__________________
Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy. Last edited by macro; 11-13-2009 at 12:40 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
Yeah, pretty much everyone is picking the Steelers. I would pick them too if I had to pick, but I don't think it's a no-brainer. The Bengals are more than capable of winning this game.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,128
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
Should be an interesting ball game. The Bengals have shown they are for real, but this game will show the degree of real they actually are.
Bengals O needs to have time of possession on their side to keep the D from getting too fatigued. Roethlisberger shines in the late stages of close games against tired defenses.
__________________
The motel of lost companions Waits with heated pool and bar |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
My clutch is broken
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 3,574
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
I'm not a Bengals fan but I really can't stand the Steelers. I'm rooting for you guys, big time.
__________________
"I can make all the stadiums rock." -Air Supply |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
Man, the media is too much some times. The articles above slobber all over The Steelers and then go on to say "and no one's really talking about them."
Are you serious? No one's talking about the team that the media is fawning all over and making sound as if the Bengals might as well forfeit? Good grief. Last edited by The Operator; 11-13-2009 at 02:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sellersburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,258
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
I see that Pittsburgh and Notre Dame are playing at Heinz field tomorrow night, so that cow pasture they call a field up there is probably going to be in worse shape than normal.
__________________
DLC11@Insightbb.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
As a fan, I'm always nervous to play The Steelers.
But for the first time, I think I can say with confidence that The Bengals aren't scared of them any more. Even in 2005, I think they were intimidated by The Steelers. But this team, all grown up, I don't think that's the case. They are pretty evenly matched so it's gonna come down to who has the better game plan and not making costly mistakes. If they can get out to a lead and force Roethlisberger to make ill-advised throws, it could be a good game. But it could just as easily go the other way. 21-20 Bengals |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,658
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
The Steelers would have loss #3 were it not for Brett Favre handing the game to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Just The Big Picture
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 6,150
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
Quote:
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, I'll readily admit that the Bengals have won some games that could have easily went the other way, but the national media seems to have us believe that the Steelers have steamrolled over everyone, which is not the case.
__________________
Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy. Last edited by macro; 11-13-2009 at 08:19 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
Quote:
Quote:
That could still be bad for us though, if Denver remains in the wild card hunt and we're trying for one too, seeing as they have the tie breaker. I still can't believe they lost to The Broncos, even with the fluke play. If The Bengals played Denver this weekend, it wouldn't even be close. But, alas, all Pittsburgh has to do is go on any kind of hot streak, and suddenly the media can't get over them. You'd think The Bengals were a pop warner team the way most of the predictions are going. Hopefully Marvin and his team are aware of just how little respect they are getting going into this game and use it as a motivator. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Vienna, OH
Posts: 4,135
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
I believe the Steelers are the better team currently but I think it's relatively close and as MWM pointed out we are fully capable of winning this game. I do think that even though it's thought the Steelers need it worse I don't believe it because I don't think we end up with identical records. Their schedule is a cake walk for them and ours has a few potential roadblocks like SD and Minnesota both on the road in difficult environments. Although I do suspect Pittsburgh will lose a game they shouldn't they won't lose 5 games maybe not even 4 and if we lose this one we have to beat everyone else but 1 and I just don't know we are at that level yet.
However Pittsburgh will be fired up over the Bengals getting any recognition for beating them in a game they feel they should have won (if not for Sweeds drop) and talk of sweeping the division when they haven't been swept yet. I think Pittsburgh has the edge so I fully expect them to win a hard hitting semi-close game say 24-16. But I believe that will be the impetus this team needs to find that next level, in other words it will serve as a constant reminder that we need to keep improving. Of course I think we can run the football on them in this game without Aaron Smith in the game and if Bratkowski could keep from ruining a potential advantage with the burning desire to get pass happy. And if we can run the football on them we have it half licked as then we'd just have to find the ability to get Ben on the ground which is no easy task. However one thing we can do is get out in front early by 10 or more points and then their Offensive coordinator may get pass happy as he is of the same ilk as Brat. Make them one dimensional by pressuring their coordinator. I say come out right away with play action and go deep (because chances are we will start with the ball) out of a formation Polamalu hasn't seen yet. Loosen up that secondary right away and keep Polamalu guessing a bit with some different stuff but run the crap out of the ball and right at him. If you do that you have a chance of getting an o-lineman on him without Aaron Smith and Kirschke in the game. That said their other starting DE Keisel is still solid against the run and they have Ziggy Hood who they may use in pass rush plays from that spot. I say run that ball do a little play action here and there and the hard part will be getting Ben on the ground, good luck with that. If he gets loose it's gonna get ugly in a hurry because his WR's get serious seperation when that happens and they also do a good job of blocking downfield.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Miami Redhawks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
I'm hoping for two things:
1) A Bengals victory 2) Hines Ward gets blown-up
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421 www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,658
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Just The Big Picture
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 6,150
|
Re: Bengals at Steelers (11/15/09)
Quote:
Even if the Steelers slip up and lose two more, they'd still be 12-4, so the Bengals could only lose one more game the rest of the way to win the division. I'll be honest; I think Pittsburgh sews up the division with a win tomorrow. But this is the NFL, and strange things happen. Even the invincible Pittsburgh Steelers are human, and capable of laying an egg or two along the way. The Bengals primary rival for a playoff spot this season may not be Pittsburgh, at all, however. Instead, it may be the wildcard contenders. I think this team is just as good (if not better) on the road than it is at home, so being a wildcard instead of division champion may not be the worst thing in the world.
__________________
Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy. Last edited by macro; 11-14-2009 at 10:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |