RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-01-2010, 02:03 PM   #721
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric_the_Red View Post
Rumors circulating that the team could cut Antonio Bryant soon.
That rumor has been floating for a few weeks now as his knee has been a concern. The bengals have already paid him 7.5 million this season and his base salary is really low this year. Based on that info I don't see Bryant getting cut this season.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline  
Turn Off Ads?
Old 08-01-2010, 02:37 PM   #722
Eric_the_Red
Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy
 
Eric_the_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,171
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
That rumor has been floating for a few weeks now as his knee has been a concern. The bengals have already paid him 7.5 million this season and his base salary is really low this year. Based on that info I don't see Bryant getting cut this season.
I saw this on ESPN Insider:

Quote:
In signing Terrell Owens, the Cincinnati Bengals now have their top two receivers set, with T.O. and Chad Ocho Cinco forming an impressive tandem.

The move also leaves Antonio Bryant, the team's offseason pick-up who was slotted to be Cincy's No. 2 WR, in a tough position. He's reportedly been bothered by a knee injury this offseason, and clearly has not impressed the team to the point where they would want to pass on bringing an extra guy like Owens into the mix.

While Bryant would now appear to be on track to be the team's No. 3 wideout, Evan Silva of ProFootballTalk.com writes that perhaps the team will choose to just release Bryant. Silva notes that doing so would save the team $1.55 million, and that Cincy already has a pair of solid slot receivers in Jordan Shipley and Andre Caldwell. Also, having another WR in Bryant who will presumably want to see plenty of passes coming his way, to go along with T.O. and Ocho Cinco, might not be something the Bengals are looking forward to.

There's no questioning Bryant's talent, however, so there's still the chance that Cincinnati will want to hang on to him and try to make things work.
I just get nervous when I read things like "save the team $1.55 million".
Eric_the_Red is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 03:32 PM   #723
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric_the_Red View Post
I saw this on ESPN Insider:



I just get nervous when I read things like "save the team $1.55 million".
I don't blame you 1.5 million is a lot of cake to us, but to a team that has already paid Bryant 7 million this season it is a pretty low base salary. Bryant's base jumps to 4.5 million next season so if his knee is bad he will most likely be cut than.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 05:04 PM   #724
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
Re: Bengals 2010

A lot of this concerns how the other Bengal receivers look and fare in this summer's preseason games. Believe it or not Jerome Simpson has looked good and Quan Cosby has always been his steady self. There's also Briscoe in the mix. They may not want to risk losing those guys because next yr and beyond they will likely need them.

Of course this is the NFL and injuries can change things. Thus the bottomline is they need to re-evaluate where they are after the preseason. They may need Bryant, gimpy knee and all if others go down or don't impress. Or they may decide to IR him or cut him but it makes no sense to do anything now.
Sea Ray is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 08:04 PM   #725
Redsfaithful
A Little to the Left
 
Redsfaithful's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
Re: Bengals 2010

I think they'd IR Bryant before they'd cut him. He could help out in 2011 and the money has for the most part already been spent.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
--Oscar Wilde
Redsfaithful is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 09:28 AM   #726
OesterPoster
Member
 
OesterPoster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West-central Ohio
Posts: 1,917
Re: Bengals 2010

Considering he's listed as a starter on Marvin's 1st depth chart of the camp...and I guess he's not getting cut very soon.
OesterPoster is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 11:00 AM   #727
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
Re: Bengals 2010

Bryant wasn't placed on the PUP list and has practiced already. To me that shows that he will be ready to go either by the 1st game or shortly there after. I don't see him being cut because the Bengals paid him a substantial signing bonus this season.
bucksfan2 is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 12:12 PM   #728
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,854
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
Bryant wasn't placed on the PUP list and has practiced already. To me that shows that he will be ready to go either by the 1st game or shortly there after. I don't see him being cut because the Bengals paid him a substantial signing bonus this season.
If I recall correctly, if they place him on the PUP list now, he can't play the first 6 weeks. With the plethora of wide receivers available, if he's not ready to go by week 1, they may do that and give themselves some extra time to get everything sorted out.

This is a good year to have 5 pre-season games too.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 01:31 PM   #729
joshnky
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
If I recall correctly, if they place him on the PUP list now, he can't play the first 6 weeks. With the plethora of wide receivers available, if he's not ready to go by week 1, they may do that and give themselves some extra time to get everything sorted out.

This is a good year to have 5 pre-season games too.
He can't be placed on PUP because he has practiced already.
joshnky is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 02:21 PM   #730
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,854
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshnky View Post
He can't be placed on PUP because he has practiced already.
I thought it was the other way around. If he was on the PUP before training camp, he could stay on that list but start practicing and play at any time. If he's put on the list now, it's an automatic 6 games he has to sit out.

I'm willing to take your word for it though as I understand next to nothing of the thousands of rules set forth on the manipulations of the rules are beyond confusing to me.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 03:06 PM   #731
joshnky
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
I thought it was the other way around. If he was on the PUP before training camp, he could stay on that list but start practicing and play at any time.
I found this comment on Bengals.com:

Quote:
» Wide receiver Antonio Bryant missed his second practice as the coaches made good on their vow to keep him from aggravating his knee. But it’s too late to put him on the physically unprepared list at the beginning of the season because he worked in the first practice on Thursday, so they must believe he’ll respond.
joshnky is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 03:44 PM   #732
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
Re: Bengals 2010

Physically Unprepared to Play refers to an off season injury. It does not include injuries that happen during practice so in order to avoid a rash of PUP candidates they say you can't go on PUP once you've participated in a practice.

Here's a great article explaining PUP:

Quote:
The Active PUP is for players that have some form of injury that will prevent them from starting training camp.

If placed on Active PUP, a player can rehab and participate in team meetings but cannot practice.

A player has to be placed on Active PUP before he begins training camp, so that's why you're seeing the stories popping up now.
http://www.examiner.com/x-778-Housto...rform-PUP-list
Sea Ray is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 05:27 PM   #733
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
Re: Bengals 2010

Lance McAlister on 1530-AM just announced that Adam Schefter is reporting that the Bengals have reached a contract agreement with Jermaine Gresham and that he may be at practice tonight at 7pm.
Sea Ray is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 05:30 PM   #734
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: Bengals 2010

earlier than I expected.
GIDP is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 05:55 PM   #735
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by GIDP View Post
earlier than I expected.
This is bigtime earlier than usual for the Bengals. In terms of base salary the Bengals paid over slot and that's amazing too. Guaranteed money is perfectly slotted. I never thought I'd see the day that Mike Brown would do this for a guy who sat out all of last year
Sea Ray is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25