RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2010, 07:11 PM   #1
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,196
The Extra Point - Why?

As I've been watching the playoffs this weekend it occurred to me what a waste of time the extra point is in football. If we were designing a game now, would anyone include it? It seems to be something that someone thought was a good idea at one point and it just became part of the game.

Is there any reason, other than tradition, why extra points shouldn't just be eliminated? Just make a TD 7 points and keep fieldgoals 3 points. Just get rid of it. It adds nothing to the game.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 01-10-2010, 07:24 PM   #2
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,349
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

I would agree, but I kind of like the option of trying a 2 point conversion attempt instead. I think I'd prefer making extra points and field goals more difficult somehow.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 07:24 PM   #3
Oxilon
Member
 
Oxilon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,133
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MWM View Post
As I've been watching the playoffs this weekend it occurred to me what a waste of time the extra point is in football. If we were designing a game now, would anyone include it? It seems to be something that someone thought was a good idea at one point and it just became part of the game.

Is there any reason, other than tradition, why extra points shouldn't just be eliminated? Just make a TD 7 points and keep fieldgoals 3 points. Just get rid of it. It adds nothing to the game.
I think they should get rid of the field goal altogether. No field goals, no extra points; Touchdowns only. And if a team scores a touchdown, they must go for the two point conversion.
__________________
That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch.
-Steve Stone
Oxilon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 08:04 PM   #4
Redhook
Miami Redhawks
 
Redhook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oxilon View Post
I think they should get rid of the field goal altogether. No field goals, no extra points; Touchdowns only. And if a team scores a touchdown, they must go for the two point conversion.
Yes. Scrawny kickers shouldn't decide a game played by athletic beasts duking it out for 3 hours. It's stupid.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips.
Redhook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 08:13 PM   #5
UKFlounder
Go Reds Go!
 
UKFlounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,829
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

It's kind of like the intentional walk in baseball - every now and then something will go wrong, and make you glad they don't just point to the batter and say go to first (though I think more extra points are missed than there are wild pitches on passed balls.)

I'd rather eliminate punting than the extra point, to be honest.
UKFlounder is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 08:18 PM   #6
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,409
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Last time I checked...teams going for 2 made the conversion over 50 percent of the time...

So if you always went for 2, could you come out ahead in the long run?
kaldaniels is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 08:26 PM   #7
dabvu2498
Yay!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,266
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
Last time I checked...teams going for 2 made the conversion over 50 percent of the time... So if you always went for 2, could you come out ahead in the long run?
It is the same rationale baseball managers use when bunting.
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done.
dabvu2498 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 08:33 PM   #8
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,662
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

From wiki:

The extra point is among the oldest parts of the game of gridiron football and dates to its rugby roots. In its earliest days, scoring a touchdown was not the primary objective but a means of getting a free kick at the goal (hence why the name "try," more commonly associated with rugby today, is still in American football rule books), and thus while a field goal would be 5 points, a touchdown would only be one point and the conversion would be worth four (for a total of five). By the start of the 20th century, touchdowns had become more important and the roles of touchdown and kick were reversed. By this time the point value for the after-touchdown kick had reduced to its current one-point value while the touchdown was now worth five. (This later increased to six points in American football in 1912 and in Canadian football in 1956.)
westofyou is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 09:46 PM   #9
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,409
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dabvu2498 View Post
It is the same rationale baseball managers use when bunting.
That definitely doesn't convince me.
kaldaniels is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 01:14 AM   #10
Yachtzee
Hisssssssss
 
Yachtzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Land of the Lost
Posts: 6,996
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Probably so that the NFL can retain one of the last vestiges of the game that justifies calling it "football" instead of some other name more consistent with how the sport is actually played.
__________________
"I don't classify 'em, I just pacify 'em." - George Foster.
Yachtzee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 07:40 AM   #11
RedFanAlways1966
For a Level Playing Field
 
RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Oakwood, OH
Posts: 11,302
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Bengals fans (and I am sure fans of other teams) know that the XP is not always automatic. Whether it be the long-snapper, the holder or the kicker. Even FGs that are closer than XPs are not gimmes (19 yards, Romo botches the hold...). I say keep it.

If a change is needed, I feel the NFL overtime is first in line. Like college? I don't know, but anything but sudden death.
__________________
Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.
RedFanAlways1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 07:50 AM   #12
reds1869
We Need Our Myths
 
reds1869's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Overlooking GABP
Posts: 4,198
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Eliminating kicking in any way would fundamentally alter football in a negative way. Think about it, and I mean really think about it. Would you enjoy a game with no punting or place kicking? I mean, would you really?
reds1869 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 08:47 AM   #13
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,744
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by reds1869 View Post
Eliminating kicking in any way would fundamentally alter football in a negative way. Think about it, and I mean really think about it. Would you enjoy a game with no punting or place kicking? I mean, would you really?
What would we call it? "Pass and run ball"? The kicking game is one of the greatest sources of unpredictability and exciting plays, IMO. I think the original post really belongs in the "things that drive you crazy thread," because I personally don't get it and see it as someone's own pet peeve.

That also keeps in mind that, like some things, the science of football kicking has progressed to the point where it is "automatic," but that has only been since the 70s. When LBers and wideouts used to handle the kicking duties as a "second job," the extra point was just as unpredictable as any FG attempt.

Something I see as a bigger challenge is the range that FG kickers have progressed to because of the influence of soccer on kickers' ability to kick the ball further. When guys are kicking 55 yarders half way up the uprights, I could see a legitimate argument for making the FG more difficult. Higher cross bar? Move in the uprights? Maybe they could have two sets of uprights, use electronics and hydraulics to move the uprights in closer for extra points, then back out to standard for FGs. Or, have a point system for FGs based on distance. Under 30 yards is 1 pt. 31-45 yards is 2 pts. 46+ is a 3 ptr. Alteration sounds much better than elimination.
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em

Last edited by traderumor; 01-11-2010 at 08:52 AM.
traderumor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 09:47 AM   #14
reds1869
We Need Our Myths
 
reds1869's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Overlooking GABP
Posts: 4,198
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by traderumor View Post
Or, have a point system for FGs based on distance. Under 30 yards is 1 pt. 31-45 yards is 2 pts. 46+ is a 3 ptr. Alteration sounds much better than elimination.
That's one heck of an idea...it'll never happen, but I like it!
reds1869 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 09:51 AM   #15
cumberlandreds
Member
 
cumberlandreds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,985
Re: The Extra Point - Why?

Whenever a game is played in Europe the extra point is always cheered more loudly than the TD. I always found that amusing.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971
cumberlandreds is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25