![]() |
|
|
#31 | |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,349
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
Quote:
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
2 in 3 years!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,279
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
Here we go.
320
__________________
I'd rather listen to Kelch read the phone book than suffer through Thom Brennaman's attempt to make every instance on the field the most important event since the discovery of manned space flight. -westofyou |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,144
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
C'mon team!
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,188
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
Are the Saints really going to go for it at midfield?
__________________
The motel of lost companions Waits with heated pool and bar |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
That ball very nearly came loose. First down for the Saints though.
Now it's under review...
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,188
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
Veeerry interesting play review here.
__________________
The motel of lost companions Waits with heated pool and bar |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
The first down stands.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,144
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
The Saints were just handed the game.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Potential Lunch Winner
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,666
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
I didn't know we were watching the refs play.
__________________
If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sellersburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,260
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
That ball is incomplete!
__________________
DLC11@Insightbb.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,516
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
I dont think that was a catch...might get overturned
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,188
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
Dang. Review-mania strikes.
__________________
The motel of lost companions Waits with heated pool and bar |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
Vikings fans have a legitimate complaint about that call. Saints move to field goal range with the gift.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: Vikes v. Saints game thread
Field goal time for the Saints and a trip to Miami...
And the kick is...delayed due to a timeout.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |