![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
2 in 3 years!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,277
|
Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
Per ORG. Per Sheldon's twitter.
Dusty told Sheldon that the organization has been considering moving Alonso to catcher. I like this. We wouldn't have this problem with him and Votto, and he'd compliment Hanigan nicely. 320
__________________
I'd rather listen to Kelch read the phone book than suffer through Thom Brennaman's attempt to make every instance on the field the most important event since the discovery of manned space flight. -westofyou |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,382
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
Take it with a grain of salt, Ill believe it when I see it.
-Matt |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 197
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
There is a reason UM turned him into a first baseman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Section 525-Saturdays.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Paris, OH
Posts: 1,980
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
Things like this is what losing organizations do. If you don't believe he can be your first baseman, or you don't wanna move Joey, then he MUST be moved for another piece that can help this team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,154
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
Believe it or not, I wondered about this before. I dont think that it is necessarily a "loser organization" idea. It may work out to be one of the smartest moves ever. Who knows. evidently somebody with some baseball intellect thinks it could work. If his bat is that special, it may be worth a try. If he can't Catch...maybe left field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wheelersburg, Ohio
Posts: 874
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
Yeah moving Pete Rose to all those different positions was a bad move. Those loser Reds of the 1970's were crazy for doing that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Section 525-Saturdays.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Paris, OH
Posts: 1,980
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 539
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
stupid idea.....its hard enough for a player who isnt a catcher to make that move in high school......and we are talking about professional baseball. stupid stupid stupid...doesnt surprise me Dusty said it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hamersville
Posts: 570
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
He was moved to 1st base because his lack of arm strength. I agree with berryluther.
__________________
Bowled my 8th 300 game 01/31/2011. Nothing like bowling a 300 game
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
Quote:
Apparently, this kid is so athletic that the only position suited for him is DH. We drafted this kid for his bat, but he apparently can't do anything in the field. I think it was half-joking on Dusty's part, but IMO it signals some frustration with the kids Defense - or obvious lack thereof. This just solidifies my feelings that this kid should be moved - along with one of our Harang or Arroyo pending FA's - at the trade deadline this year for a long-term answer somewhere else. We have enough prospects at LF/3B - and Votto should be manning 1B for the next 10 years - so this kid's best Asset for this organization is in a trade. PEACE -BLEEDS
__________________
I think that in a year or two, one of these guys - Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, Stubbs - will be ready to replace Dunn. They won't hit as many home runs as Dunn, but they should have similar OPS. - 757690, July 22, 2008 Alonso will be playing 1B for the REDS and batting 4th one year from today. - Kingspoint, July 9, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wheelersburg, Ohio
Posts: 874
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
True. But your point was that losing organizations do something like this. Not true and that was my point.
I think they are looking at ways to try to get Alonso in the bigs and that Votto is not going anywhere, nor should he. The other option would be trade Alonso (which most everyone on this board would go nuts if it happened, because we would never get enough in return). But IMO the Reds want to see if he can make this switch. It's not exactly like we've got catcher's in the minor leagues that are knocking on the door to the big leagues. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 82
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
I do not like this. He's a first baseman. Keep him there. Votto could play left. Alonso is not a catcher. Like others have said, he does not have the arm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
2 in 3 years!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
Apparently someone from tORG had a friend at a winter caravan today ask Walt about it, and Walt said he'd heard nothing about it all.
Maybe it was just a joke from the Dusty? 320
__________________
I'd rather listen to Kelch read the phone book than suffer through Thom Brennaman's attempt to make every instance on the field the most important event since the discovery of manned space flight. -westofyou |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: way-east of cincinnati
Posts: 1,158
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
Quote:
Last edited by gedred69; 01-31-2010 at 10:29 PM. Reason: additional comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 6,940
|
Re: Sheldon: Alonso may become catcher?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |