![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
College Football National Signing Day
According to the Worldwide Leader, Florida has the number one recruiting class in the nation with Texas behind them.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/recru...ory?id=4882791 Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
Looks like Florida is the clear cut concensus #1 this year. I'm relieved to see that my Tenn Vols didn't get decimated as I had feared after the Lane Kiffin defection. I think they're still a little short on LBs but they did get a good kicker, top notch WRs and a few QBs. They even got another one of Phil Simms' sons.
When your rivals are recruiting like they are in the SEC it's awfully hard to keep up. I don't know how long UC can continue to finish top ten with top 60 talent. Doesn't look like Kelly did so well in his first class at ND. He only got two top 100 players |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
I'm happy with Kentucky's class. Two 4 star recruits at major positions of need in Brandon Gainer and Alex Smith, and some 3 stars who look pretty promising.
The more I watch Derek Dooley, the more I think he is a young Randy Travis. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
Quote:
Maybe he can sing country songs like "Rocky Top" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
Kentucky grabbed a guy who had committed to IU, to be honest if I was "considering" the two I'm not sure I'd give IU a second thought.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
Kudos to Lane Kiffin for holding on to Pete Carroll's recruits and adding some other big ones like Seantrel Henderson and Hayes Pullard. USC landed three of Scout's top five recruits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
Did Lane end up poaching any of the UT kids?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cincinnati/Colerain
Posts: 1,247
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
[QUOTE=I don't know how long UC can continue to finish top ten with top 60 talent.[/QUOTE]
UC recruits speed and that'll be good enough to compete and win the Big East with the teams that are in it. It's just when UC plays a Florida or a top level team they will get beaten up because they lack the elite talent especially at the line of scrimmage. Butch Jones runs a system very similar to Brian Kelly, if you have speed you will win at least 75% of your games.
__________________
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/ShaneHorning |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 1,656
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
He didn't have enough math credits to qualify under SEC rules for JuCo transfers, so at least part of that had to do with academics.
USC also got Markeith Ambles, a highly rated WR who had been a UT commit. OTOH, UT got some very good players who were not considering UT under Kiffen. Dooley did a great job of recruiting in such a short time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
Funny how things are perceived from campus to campus. The morning Enquirer calls UC's class "tremendous" and coach Jones calls it the best ever. The article goes on to say it was rated #59 by Rivals and #62 by Scout.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
While they don't have the quantity Louisville and Kentucky both ended up pulling better players out of Cincinnati than UC did. And I don't understand the "speed" comment. I see a few 4.5 40s on the UC commit list (at Rivals) but that is hardly fast and most schools do better than that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cincinnati/Colerain
Posts: 1,247
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
Quote:
__________________
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/ShaneHorning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: College Football National Signing Day
I'm interested in doing a little analysis but I need to get my hands on some data.
Would anyone be able to e-mail me the Rivals rankings from say the last 7 or 8 years. PM me if this is possible.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |