![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Vavasor
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,678
|
Number 5 starter
I was wondering who everyone thinks will be the #5 starter out of ST this year? Not a poll, and not who you WANT to be the #5, but who you think will get/win the job. It's definitely up for grabs on the surface. Here are the candidates:
Matt Maloney Aroldis Chapman Kip Wells Justin Lehr Micah Owings Travis Wood Mike Leake I don't believe for a second that Lincoln is a candidate. So who do YOU think wins the job?
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar." Last edited by TRF; 02-23-2010 at 12:42 PM. Reason: Added some pitchers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,409
|
Re: Number 5 starter
I think Maloney takes it.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Number 5 starter
I'm going with the darkhorse Chapman
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vavasor
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,678
|
Re: Number 5 starter
remember, explain your choice
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Number 5 starter
I just feel that the way Price gushes about Chapman, and how easier it would be for him to acclimate in Cincy, that he has more of an edge than we think
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Number 5 starter
I think Wood will have a good spring training and earn the job for about half the season then Chapman takes over. A poll would also be nice
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Let's ride
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado's eastern plains
Posts: 11,232
|
Re: Number 5 starter
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
I'm back... and forth
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,612
|
Re: Number 5 starter
Quote:
I'm going to go with Maloney. I think Owings makes the team in the bullpen/PH role, while Maloney comes in with a nice spring and takes the spot. Maybe the Reds can finagle the schedule the right way so that Maloney starts most of his games on the road? Is that even possible? I figure for any position, it would be the 5th starter that could possibly do that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Number 5 starter
It is if you can provide documented proof of your gut being right in the past.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Number 5 starter
Based on this team needing a winning season in the not too distant future, I can think of 1 reason why Chapman's contract shouldn't stand in the way.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I'm back... and forth
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,612
|
Re: Number 5 starter
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Number 5 starter
I don't make those decisions, but we'll have to see in the spring if those who do feel that 5 or 6 wins could be the difference in the standings at the end of the year.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Number 5 starter
I'll have to agree with you on this one. I think any of those starters could handle the 5th spot for 2 months while Chapman gets a little extra work in the minors.
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Number 5 starter
I think Maloney will be handed the job if he pitches adequately during the spring. The Reds have to find out if he is good enough to invest in long term...of course it also gives Wood another 3 months to a full season in AAA. Maloney could be trade bait by June if Wood is pitching really well at AAA.
Bum |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: Number 5 starter
I think Matt Maloney will win the fifth starter job out of spring training but Chapman will force his way into the majors by June.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |