![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
Why did they keep Lincoln?
I honestly feel the Cardinals were insulted that the Reds brought in a pitcher of Lincoln's caliber and they made the Reds pay for it. The other thing is I question Dickerson's baseball IQ somewhat, how do you not know who's coming home and make an accurate throw instead of the laser attempt, Puhols was jogging home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Battle Toad Historian
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,650
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
The sky is falling
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
I just asked a question, maybe I'll ask it tomorrow, maybe youll feel better then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,347
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
We should DFA Dickerson, Lincoln and Masset.
We still have a shot at 161-1.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
Quote:
As a fan that was also insulted by some of the in-game selections today, I agree with you. I don't think the Cards were insulted rather than just pleased with who was pitching. Albert was licking his chops I'm sure. Dickerson's IQ should not be questioned. He's still a relatively young player to the big leagues. I think he just got overanxious and put too much on a ball that he knows needs to be level or bounced to the catcher. Even if his airmail is a direct shot to Hernandez, its much harder for him get the tag on the runner. Hence the preference of the bounce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,883
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
They put him in because when he wasn't hurt, he wasn't a bad pitcher. I still wouldn't let him pitch to Albert Pujols, but I think your anger at who the Reds put in a game in the 6th inning(pretty much any middle reliever coming in the 6th is by definition mediocre at best.) is a bit much.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
Quote:
That being said, there was much more than just Pujols beating Lincoln around. The guy gave up four hits, one of which was to Pujols. He also was taken out before more damage could be done. People will call Ice and myself over reactors, but I see nothing that leads me to believe Lincoln warrants a roster spot. If the guy finishes the year with an ERA under 5, I'd be shocked. Did he lose the game? Certainly, he did not. If Massett holds in the 9th, the game is winnable. However, I fail to see why a guy like Lincoln is on a big league ballclub, let alone thrust into the first bullpen appearance of the year when he is most definitely the worst pitcher on the club. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
why cant these things be talked about on a baseball message board without people flipping out, geez, everyone is supposed to shut up and not post, for crying out load this board has changed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,638
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
OMG Ice...quit griping and just shut up already. :O) I keed, I keed.
Seriously though, I somewhat agree with you guys. Lincoln being on the club is questionable to say the least. He does have a very good arm & stuff. He's had success in the past when healthy. But he really doesn't have much in terms of upside. Where that bothers me is when we've got some talented young pitchers in the minors waiting for a slot. I know the money owed Lincoln is a concern for the Reds, but their main concern should be results. He didn't really impress during ST and he was pretty far from impressive last season, so I'm not sure what the Reds were looking for in terms of criteria from him...for all the griping about Balentien & Cairo and roster spots...Lincoln is the roster spot that surprised me most.
__________________
“If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant’s life, she will choose to save the infant’s life without even considering if there is a man on base.” —Dave Barry |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,304
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
Quote:
Bum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
beats me
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,633
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,304
|
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?
Quote:
I guess we could have brought Masset in earlier... :
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |