RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2010, 04:24 PM   #1
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
Why did they keep Lincoln?

I honestly feel the Cardinals were insulted that the Reds brought in a pitcher of Lincoln's caliber and they made the Reds pay for it. The other thing is I question Dickerson's baseball IQ somewhat, how do you not know who's coming home and make an accurate throw instead of the laser attempt, Puhols was jogging home.
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 04-05-2010, 04:29 PM   #2
thatcoolguy_22
Battle Toad Historian
 
thatcoolguy_22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,650
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

The sky is falling
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board.
thatcoolguy_22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 04:32 PM   #3
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

I just asked a question, maybe I'll ask it tomorrow, maybe youll feel better then.
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 04:36 PM   #4
KronoRed
The Lineups stink.
 
KronoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,347
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatcoolguy_22 View Post
The sky is falling
We should DFA Dickerson, Lincoln and Masset.

We still have a shot at 161-1.
__________________
Go Gators!
KronoRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 05:04 PM   #5
forfreelin04
Member
 
forfreelin04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,267
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

Quote:
Originally Posted by icehole3 View Post
I honestly feel the Cardinals were insulted that the Reds brought in a pitcher of Lincoln's caliber and they made the Reds pay for it. The other thing is I question Dickerson's baseball IQ somewhat, how do you not know who's coming home and make an accurate throw instead of the laser attempt, Puhols was jogging home.
Ice,

As a fan that was also insulted by some of the in-game selections today, I agree with you. I don't think the Cards were insulted rather than just pleased with who was pitching. Albert was licking his chops I'm sure.

Dickerson's IQ should not be questioned. He's still a relatively young player to the big leagues. I think he just got overanxious and put too much on a ball that he knows needs to be level or bounced to the catcher. Even if his airmail is a direct shot to Hernandez, its much harder for him get the tag on the runner. Hence the preference of the bounce.
forfreelin04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 05:20 PM   #6
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

Quote:
Originally Posted by forfreelin04 View Post
Ice,

As a fan that was also insulted by some of the in-game selections today, I agree with you. I don't think the Cards were insulted rather than just pleased with who was pitching. Albert was licking his chops I'm sure.

Dickerson's IQ should not be questioned. He's still a relatively young player to the big leagues. I think he just got overanxious and put too much on a ball that he knows needs to be level or bounced to the catcher. Even if his airmail is a direct shot to Hernandez, its much harder for him get the tag on the runner. Hence the preference of the bounce.
I appreciate the honest answer, this place man I tell you has turned into...
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 05:24 PM   #7
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,883
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

They put him in because when he wasn't hurt, he wasn't a bad pitcher. I still wouldn't let him pitch to Albert Pujols, but I think your anger at who the Reds put in a game in the 6th inning(pretty much any middle reliever coming in the 6th is by definition mediocre at best.) is a bit much.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 05:40 PM   #8
forfreelin04
Member
 
forfreelin04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,267
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
They put him in because when he wasn't hurt, he wasn't a bad pitcher. I still wouldn't let him pitch to Albert Pujols, but I think your anger at who the Reds put in a game in the 6th inning(pretty much any middle reliever coming in the 6th is by definition mediocre at best.) is a bit much.
I don't think I'd let anyone this side of Tim Lincecum pitch to Pujols. However, the Reds, for whatever reason, have always seen differently. Guy is nails and "the hitter" of his generation.

That being said, there was much more than just Pujols beating Lincoln around. The guy gave up four hits, one of which was to Pujols. He also was taken out before more damage could be done.

People will call Ice and myself over reactors, but I see nothing that leads me to believe Lincoln warrants a roster spot. If the guy finishes the year with an ERA under 5, I'd be shocked.

Did he lose the game? Certainly, he did not. If Massett holds in the 9th, the game is winnable. However, I fail to see why a guy like Lincoln is on a big league ballclub, let alone thrust into the first bullpen appearance of the year when he is most definitely the worst pitcher on the club.
forfreelin04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 05:49 PM   #9
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

why cant these things be talked about on a baseball message board without people flipping out, geez, everyone is supposed to shut up and not post, for crying out load this board has changed
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 05:56 PM   #10
_Sir_Charles_
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
 
_Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,638
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

OMG Ice...quit griping and just shut up already. :O) I keed, I keed.

Seriously though, I somewhat agree with you guys. Lincoln being on the club is questionable to say the least. He does have a very good arm & stuff. He's had success in the past when healthy. But he really doesn't have much in terms of upside. Where that bothers me is when we've got some talented young pitchers in the minors waiting for a slot. I know the money owed Lincoln is a concern for the Reds, but their main concern should be results.

He didn't really impress during ST and he was pretty far from impressive last season, so I'm not sure what the Reds were looking for in terms of criteria from him...for all the griping about Balentien & Cairo and roster spots...Lincoln is the roster spot that surprised me most.
__________________
“If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant’s life, she will choose to save the infant’s life without even considering if there is a man on base.” —Dave Barry
_Sir_Charles_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 05:59 PM   #11
Bumstead
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,304
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

Quote:
Originally Posted by icehole3 View Post
why cant these things be talked about on a baseball message board without people flipping out, geez, everyone is supposed to shut up and not post, for crying out load this board has changed
What does this have to do with the post? Lincoln is a mediocre relief pitcher. Mediocre relief pitchers come in in the 6th inning of games their team trails in. If he has a 5 ERA he will be an average 6th inning relief pitcher. What RH reliever was a better option? It's one outing. You aren't barbecuing Masset...The Reds management chose to pitch to Pujols...why do that?

Bum
Bumstead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 06:08 PM   #12
flyer85
He has the Evil Eye!
 
flyer85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

beats me
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand
flyer85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 06:09 PM   #13
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumstead View Post
What does this have to do with the post? Lincoln is a mediocre relief pitcher. Mediocre relief pitchers come in in the 6th inning of games their team trails in. If he has a 5 ERA he will be an average 6th inning relief pitcher. What RH reliever was a better option? It's one outing. You aren't barbecuing Masset...The Reds management chose to pitch to Pujols...why do that?

Bum
I understand baseball dude, Lincoln shouldve been the last man in, his role is mopup not first reliever in a game thats still in reach, thats my only point and to have guys freaking on me whether its game one or game 2 or game 100, I dont care, its just a message board we can express opinions and its a good thing (using my Marvin Lewis voice) its going to be OK, I will bring up a Dusty error in judgement next time too. As far another reliever, how about Owings
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 06:10 PM   #14
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,633
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumstead View Post
What does this have to do with the post? Lincoln is a mediocre relief pitcher. Mediocre relief pitchers come in in the 6th inning of games their team trails in. If he has a 5 ERA he will be an average 6th inning relief pitcher. What RH reliever was a better option? It's one outing. You aren't barbecuing Masset...The Reds management chose to pitch to Pujols...why do that?

Bum
The sixth inning is the domain of the tweener and that's what Lincoln is, when the Reds can go from starter to closer without a hitch 162 games then I'll be surprised, not when they actually fail to convert the opportunity day after day.
westofyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 06:12 PM   #15
Bumstead
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,304
Re: Why did they keep Lincoln?

Quote:
Originally Posted by icehole3 View Post
I understand baseball dude, Lincoln shouldve been the last man in, his role is mopup not first reliever in a game thats still in reach, thats my only point and to have guys freaking on me whether its game one or game 2 or game 100, I dont care, its just a message board we can express opinions and its a good thing (using my Marvin Lewis voice) its going to be OK, I will bring up a Dusty error in judgement next time too. As far another reliever, how about Owings
I don't think anybody's freakin', I think they are poking fun. JMO

I guess we could have brought Masset in earlier... :
Bumstead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25