![]() |
|
|
#106 |
|
Vavasor
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,730
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
can't... not... take... bait...
sigh. Not trading for Rolen would have the Reds in an even BETTER position to sign Chapman. It would give the Reds bullpen a shot in the arm as Roenicke or even Stewart could come in to help. It would free 3B for Frazier or Francisco, or even Valaika, who is tear it up at AAA. Rolen has hit. yes. and he's already missed games due to his CHRONIC back problems. Extending a guy with CHRONIC back problems at age 35 doesn't seem smart to me. As for the slow starts by Frazier and JF, big deal. They've always hit, and they will this year. Rolen isn't hurting the Red offense or defense when he plays, but if he plays 120 games, I'll be stunned. BTW, Vlad Guerrero can barely stand much less play LF. I swear I think I could out run him now.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar." |
|
|
|
|
|
#107 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,664
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Quote:
And Zach Stewart? The same guy with an ERA over 5 in AA? That guy could be helping the Reds right now? Are you living on the same planet?
__________________
Go BLUE!!! Last edited by Benihana; 05-03-2010 at 05:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 | |
|
Vavasor
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,730
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Quote:
BTW, Nick Masset has an 11.45 ERA this year. in 11 innings. guess he's now terrible too.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,664
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Quote:
I'm not dismissing these guys as washed up, but to think that they could be helping the Reds more than Rolen is simply delusional. For the record, Stewart is a year older, a level behind, pitches with the wrong hand, and doing significantly worse in almost every facet of the game than Travis Wood, who is currently 8th or 9th on our organizational starting pitching depth chart, so it's time we put this one to bed.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! Last edited by Benihana; 05-03-2010 at 05:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,695
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
I'd give this one more time to see if it's just randomness. They might have him working on something too.
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
#111 | |
|
Vavasor
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,730
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Quote:
And if Roenicke, who some view as a future closer, pitches 50+ innings for Toronto this year with a sub 3 ERA and 45+ K's, I think that'll have some value. I think he's up to stay right now. I think Stewart is a starter until he proves he isn't, and 4 starts doesn't prove it. He's also been mentioned as having closer stuff. That Toronto pitching rotation is looking pretty good, and Roenicke makes the pen better (their pen was getting shelled)
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,664
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Quote:
Edwin Encarnacion would be playing 3B right now if this trade wasn't made. And he'd be taking up $4+MM of payroll. And Chris Valaika will NEVER EVER EVER hit enough to be a starting 3B in the major leagues. Juan Francisco's defense would make people long for EE, and Todd Frazier is almost batting under .100 in AAA, so I don't think that he would be an upgrade at 3B on a competitive team at the moment.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,664
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Quote:
If Roenicke pitches 50+ innings, he will more than double his career output. Asking him to do so at a comparable level to what he did in the minors at age 27 is no small expectation.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 | |
|
Vavasor
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,730
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Quote:
Also, if EE wasn't injured there were rumblings of him in LF. it may have been idle chatter, but I would prefer him to Gomes in LF.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
High five!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 6,813
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
I love re-runs.
__________________
"Bring on Rod Stupid!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,749
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
You're not going to see Stewart struggle this badly for long, he's too good, unless he's hurt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,696
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Not to veer too far off subject, but I don't think Roenicke is anything special.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,664
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Exactly. He's no different than Ondrusek or Fisher, et al
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,664
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
Quote:
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120 |
|
Vavasor
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,730
|
Re: Zach Stewart's progress
there is a reason EVERY team passed on him.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar." |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |