RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > Minor League Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-04-2010, 10:10 AM   #121
jojo
Five Tool Fool
 
jojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,569
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

To be absolutely fair, Dye seems to have passed on several teams as well.
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
jojo is online now   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 05-04-2010, 10:20 AM   #122
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Because hes unwilling to accept that he really isnt worth 8 digits anymore.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 10:34 AM   #123
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,421
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRF View Post
there is a reason EVERY team passed on him.
So I guess you wouldn't have wanted Pedro Martinez last year, either.

Just because a veteran doesn't have a job in April doesn't mean he can't contribute more than what you currently have. My guess is that Dye won't be unemployed for much longer, and there is a good chance he will be better than the flack we are currently running out there for 2/3 of our outfield.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 10:41 AM   #124
TRF
Vavasor
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,678
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benihana View Post
So I guess you wouldn't have wanted Pedro Martinez last year, either.

Just because a veteran doesn't have a job in April doesn't mean he can't contribute more than what you currently have. My guess is that Dye won't be unemployed for much longer, and there is a good chance he will be better than the flack we are currently running out there for 2/3 of our outfield.
Not at the cost he is demanding. Pedro chose where he wanted to go, but there were no rumors of him to the Yankees or even Red Sox that I remember. I just don't think teams feel Dye will hold up or not be a defensive liability.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar."
TRF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 10:56 AM   #125
camisadelgolf
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
 
camisadelgolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRF View Post
there is a reason EVERY team passed on him.
Race?
http://content.usatoday.com/communit...-is-an-issue/1
camisadelgolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 11:11 AM   #126
jojo
Five Tool Fool
 
jojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,569
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Please, lets not take this thread....THERE
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
jojo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 09:50 AM   #127
lollipopcurve
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,482
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Pitching on 4 days rest for the 2nd straight time (following an outing on 12 days rest), Stewart has another clunker for AA New Hampshire:

3 IP, 5 hits, 5 ER, 4 BB, 3 K, 1 HR

Through 5 starts and 23 innings, Stewart's ERA sits at 6.94 with 26 hits, 11 BB and 5 HR allowed.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini
lollipopcurve is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 10:03 AM   #128
JaxRed
Member
 
JaxRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 9,228
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Almost sounds like he is hurt
JaxRed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 10:39 AM   #129
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,421
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Sounds like the Homer Bailey of AA.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 12:33 PM   #130
camisadelgolf
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
 
camisadelgolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Sounds like he's lacking in command and breezed through the lower minors based on only his stuff.
camisadelgolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 12:53 PM   #131
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,723
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Quote:
Originally Posted by camisadelgolf View Post
Sounds like he's lacking in command and breezed through the lower minors based on only his stuff.
Yet with the Reds, he dominated AA and had a 6.8% walk rate. Something is off with him. Just don't know what it is.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 12:56 PM   #132
lollipopcurve
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,482
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

May be injured. the 12-day layoff was an obvious red flag. TINSTAAPP is a cliche worth remembering, even if Stewart wins the Cy Young award someday.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini
lollipopcurve is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 07:54 PM   #133
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,421
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Doesn't matter to me whether he is hurt or it is general ineffectiveness. Either one corroborates TINSTAAPP.

Risk of injury is just as much worth worrying about as risk of ineffectiveness. Stewart is clearly suffering from (at least) one of these problems.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2010, 08:55 AM   #134
kpresidente
Member
 
kpresidente's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,421
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

My objection to the trade still stands. I always thought Rolen would be an upgrade, and defended him against other objectors who thought he wouldn't produce, but the point was that I didn't think the Reds would be good enough in the coming few seasons for it to matter. Sure enough, Rolen's playing lights out, and we're sitting at around .500.

In the meantime, our much-vaunted young staff (Bailey, Volquez, and Cueto) are disappointing to say the least, and having another potential starter like Stewart in the pipelines would be a boon. Ditto for the Roenicke and the pen. Nick Massett ain't exactly the superstar everybody thought he was. Carlos Fisher hasn't panned out. In addition, we've got people saying we should trade BP to open up a spot for Frazier (!?), and nobody knows what to do with Francisco. In my world, they would platoon at 3B for years to come. Years when we might actually have all the pieces come together well enough to win something.
kpresidente is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2010, 08:56 AM   #135
klw
Member
 
klw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 4,305
Re: Zach Stewart's progress

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benihana View Post
TINSTAAPP!
.
TINSTAAPP?
HUH?
klw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25