![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wilmington,NC
Posts: 5,453
|
Rays Designate Hank Blalock For Assignment
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
Rays Designate Hank Blalock For Assignment By Ben Nicholson-Smith [June 29 at 10:02pm CST] The Rays designated Hank Blalock for assignment, according to the Tampa Tribune (via Twitter). Gabe Kapler returns from the disabled list tomorrow, so the Rays can afford to part with Blalock. They promoted him in mid-May, just as Pat Burrell's disappointing stint in Tampa was coming to an end. But after tearing through Triple A pitching early on in the season, Blalock hit just one homer and posted a .254/.319/.349 line in the majors. Blalock, 29, signed a minor league deal with the Rays in March. He makes $925K plus incentives, but even at that salary, it would be a surprise to see a team claim him. Instead, Blalock could be traded or released within the next ten days. The White Sox have been relying on Mark Kotsay to DH and could use depth at third. Blalock could be a consideration, but he may not be the answer since he has hit righties better than lefties in his career, much like Kotsay. The Twins could look to improve over Danny Valencia and the Angels could use corner infielders, but there's no guarantee either team believes in Blalock's bat or his ability to defend. Blalock was mostly a DH for the Rays, though he did appear at first, third and in right. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wilmington,NC
Posts: 5,453
|
Re: Rays Designate Hank Blalock For Assignment
Should the Reds consider claiming Blalock? Would he help the Bench?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,486
|
Re: Rays Designate Hank Blalock For Assignment
Miguel Cairo has outplayed him this year.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Future is Now
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,899
|
Re: Rays Designate Hank Blalock For Assignment
Can only play 1B and 3B. Really a liability at 3B at this point in his career.
His best years are long behind him.
__________________
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4 2013 Attendance Record: 5-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,486
|
Re: Rays Designate Hank Blalock For Assignment
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,039
|
Re: Rays Designate Hank Blalock For Assignment
Probably not going to be the popular opinion here but I'd like to see the Reds go after Blalock.Rolen has quickly become one of my favorite Reds but I'm still a bit worried that injuries could be an issue at some point this year.I'd really like Blalock as a backup plan even if his defense is terrible.He would be much better then any other options the Reds currently have if Rolen had to miss some time.He'd also be a decent guy to fill in for Votto and a nice PH bat off the bench in games he doesn't start.He'd be a clear upgrade over Cairo imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
We Need Our Myths
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Overlooking GABP
Posts: 4,198
|
Re: Rays Designate Hank Blalock For Assignment
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |