![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 266
|
FA OF options in 2011
Complete FA list: http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/0...ee-agents.html
Really the only OF I like for the Reds there is Werth. I'm sure some people wll want Crawford, but I would stay away from him. But actually, to me, there is only one guy on that list who could really fill that hole for the Reds, and is likely to be undervalued.... (Adam Dunn's theme music plays) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 597
|
Re: FA OF options in 2011
Who won't want Jason Werth...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: FA OF options in 2011
Why do we even look at FA lists and look at the above-average to great players?
Do we REALLY think the Reds are going to be in serious contention for any of them? The biggest splash we will make in FA next year will be IFF we decide to pick up Arroyo's option. MAYBE a trade, maybe. We don't sign top-tier FA's. PEACE -BLEEDS
__________________
I think that in a year or two, one of these guys - Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, Stubbs - will be ready to replace Dunn. They won't hit as many home runs as Dunn, but they should have similar OPS. - 757690, July 22, 2008 Alonso will be playing 1B for the REDS and batting 4th one year from today. - Kingspoint, July 9, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 655
|
Re: FA OF options in 2011
i could see werth and crawford going to the yanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,013
|
Re: FA OF options in 2011
This team needs to continue to improve itself through int'l free agents, the draft, and trades. Later this season, or in the off-season I think they are gonna make a few big time trades to bring in a LF'er or SS or both. We have a ton of prospects and most will probably flame out before the bigs, so why not trade them for proven talent.
I hope we do not see any big free agent spending in the near future, none of the guys available intrigue me. I would like a Crawford or a Werth but would not spend 15 million dollars on either one of them like they will most likely receive. I would actually prefer Crawford to Werth though, I feel like he is more likely to continue his numbers than Werth, I bet Werth wouldn't do nearly as well in a lineup this isn't flat out stacked. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: FA OF options in 2011
Quote:
IMO, they are all the same - prospects - trade some of them along with some vets at the trade deadline, and get some more proven/depth at positions of need (SS, LF, C). You've got to trade value for value. e.g. I don't care if Alonso ends up hitting .350 in the AL as a DH, he has no position in the NL, trade him for a SS of the futue, we have enough 1B/LF/DH prospects to choke a horse. PEACE -BLEEDS
__________________
I think that in a year or two, one of these guys - Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, Stubbs - will be ready to replace Dunn. They won't hit as many home runs as Dunn, but they should have similar OPS. - 757690, July 22, 2008 Alonso will be playing 1B for the REDS and batting 4th one year from today. - Kingspoint, July 9, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 245
|
Re: FA OF options in 2011
Why is Jermaine Dye still a FA? Better yet, why haven't we picked him up THIS YEAR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 6,940
|
Re: FA OF options in 2011
I have absolutely zero interest in any Outfielder not currently a Cincinnati RED to become a Cincinnati RED over the next 7 years.
We have so much Outfield talent in our organization right now, that we'll have to trade some of it away. There is not room for even a 5th Outfielder from outside this organization. Other GM's are drooling over the Outfield talent we have here in Cincinnati for the next 7 seasons. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |