![]() |
|
|
#76 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,131
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
The NFL's replay challege decisions would be much shorter if they didn't sell advertising time during it.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,382
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
Quote:
slowing the already 19th century infused pace should be avoided. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
The NFL is certainly not unwatchable, IMO.
They get the calls right a lot more than MLB. They also have a lot better competitive balance and a much more even playing field than MLB. There's a reason why the NFL is slowly usurping MLB as the national pastime. This call might be the final straw that causes replay to come into the game on more than just home runs. I would applaud that. I'll take a longer game with correct calls over a fast game where the outcome is decided by umpires. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Socratic Gadfly
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
Don Denkinger to Jim Joyce...
"Welcome to my world."
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,382
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
Quote:
Let the manager challenge the call (once per game) and have an official in the booth view the replay(s), make the call, and inform the crew chief via radio. It would apply to only to boundary calls, force plays, and tags. Is it perfect? No. But it would be a quick and painless way to correct gross mistakes with virtually no impact on the pace and length of the game. If you want to speed up the pace of the game, call the real strikezone and get more swings, more balls in play, more strikes and not so many boring walks and deep counts.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Socratic Gadfly
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
But there have been a fraction of perfect games compared to World Series games. This will be remembered for a very long time.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,382
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,659
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
Accounts out of Detroit have Jim Joyce utterly distraught about his blown call. He might never be the same. Very sad.
http://twitter.com/AmyKNelson
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
Galarraga on the phone -- some real class there.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Do it!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rincon, PR-Winter Pk, FL
Posts: 1,820
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: Armando Galarraga perfect through 7
Quote:
Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that you have to include replay in baseball at this point. I just think the umps should over rule each other on the field if they see a blatant missed call. I don't know whether this one would qualify but in general baseball umps are too insecure to allow such a thing. In the mid 70s I was at a Reds game where an ump did over rule another and it led to a key run scoring for our Reds. The home plate umpire called a Red out at the plate but since he was behind the plate he couldn't see that the catcher did not apply the tag. The 1st base ump immediately signaled safe and after a very short conference, the final call was safe. I wish this would happen more often. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |