RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > Minor League Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2010, 04:52 AM   #1
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,029
I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

The guy is in AAA, let him hit and if he comes north in September is that a bad thing, I know Dusty and Matthews Sr are old buds and this could be Tavares 2.0, but is there a need to bash, Heisey and Stubbs arent going anywhere, well they may get traded but I have complete faith WJ after the Rolen trade
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 06-29-2010, 09:07 AM   #2
TheBigLebowski
Winning the Human Race
 
TheBigLebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,798
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

My hope is that the signing was merely for organizational depth. If that's the case, I have no issue - nice having a guy in AAA who is ML-ready should we incur an injury. Still, the memories of Corey Patterson and Chilly Willy Tavares are waaaaaaay too fresh in the minds of this fanbase for a signing like this not to be replete with fans gnashing their teeth.
__________________
The land was farther away from the core and had much less gravity so bigness could develop and dominate
-Jose Canseco
TheBigLebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 09:21 AM   #3
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,029
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

I could see if the Reds had a big market budget, but they dont and this is the best way for the Reds to have some backup players in case of injuries, NY and LA, if an injury occurs just go out and trade their farm systems, the Reds cant logically afford to go that far
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 09:30 AM   #4
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

I think it has a lot to do with the manager being his dads best friend, quotes like "he plays better when he plays a lot", and the fact that they will turn to him over basically everyone else the moment the opportunity presents itself. People dont want him around. He hasnt been good for 4 years, and other than 3 career years he was bad prior to that even. Reds fans dont trust that he would be used in the same roll as laynce nix. We see him being used way too much and way too much in centerfield. So yes a lot of us are goin to be dissapointed if he does great in AAA.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 10:28 AM   #5
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,029
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

If that happens sure let the party begin, but everytime the guy gets a hit guys start hyperventilating, praying that he K's every atbat, thats no way to be a Reds fan IMO
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 11:57 AM   #6
medford
Member
 
medford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,037
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

The guy is nothing more than organizational depth in a place where the Reds may need some depth/help on the major league level at some point this year. Stubbs is pretty well entrenched in CF right now. Bruce has RF locked down, and how do you sit Gomes and his production so far this year? Nix is nothing to write home about, and hits lefties as well as I do (well OK, slightly better, but only slightly), Dickerson is productive when he plays, but he can't stay healthy and I would imagine that Heisey gets brought up a lot from other teams anytime there are trade talks.

OK, so maybe Dusty is friends with his dad, but it seems like Dusty is friends with anyone that played in the 70s. Perhaps he's just one of those guys that's never meet a man he didn't like. At some point, there is a decent chance the Reds will need someone to man CF for a game or 3 either due to injury, trade or players needed rest. The Reds have no one in the minors right now that they can put in CF and feel comfortable. GMJ offers some much needed depth. From GMJ perspective, he knows there are no spots on a major league roster for him right now, but he probably got a promise of a september call up, and he proably knows there is a good chance either Heisey or Stubbs gets moved before August and the Reds need some help on the bench.

I won't worry about this until GMJ is taking bats for the Reds in ST. If he's still here next year, at least on anything beyond a minor league contract I'll be surprised.
medford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 12:26 PM   #7
GIDP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

Quote:
Originally Posted by icehole3 View Post
If that happens sure let the party begin, but everytime the guy gets a hit guys start hyperventilating, praying that he K's every atbat, thats no way to be a Reds fan IMO
This forum would be pretty limited if we only allowed post after something happens.
GIDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 03:46 PM   #8
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

I don't think people are bashing Matthews himself. We all know who he is; a replacement level player getting paid much more than that.

The "bashing" is of Jocketty for picking up a replacement level player for a position where we already have a good amount of depth and of Dusty for talking about his possible future in Cincinnati, when we already have 5 above replacement level OFs in the majors.

Obviously anything management says in the press about a guy's future should be taken with a grain of salt, but you can't blame us for being a bit jumpy when it comes to acquiring and playing replacement (or below replacement) level talent based on the argument that they were good at one point and just to recapture their perceived former glory.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 04:01 PM   #9
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,029
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

the rooting for Reds players to do bad is what got to me, thats all
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 04:50 PM   #10
TRF
Vavasor
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,680
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

Quote:
Originally Posted by icehole3 View Post
the rooting for Reds players to do bad is what got to me, thats all
nobody is doing that. I just want him to be Gary Matthews Jr. That oughta do it.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar."
TRF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 04:52 PM   #11
redsmetz
Redsmetz
 
redsmetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winton Place
Posts: 10,453
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
I don't think people are bashing Matthews himself. We all know who he is; a replacement level player getting paid much more than that.

The "bashing" is of Jocketty for picking up a replacement level player for a position where we already have a good amount of depth and of Dusty for talking about his possible future in Cincinnati, when we already have 5 above replacement level OFs in the majors.

Obviously anything management says in the press about a guy's future should be taken with a grain of salt, but you can't blame us for being a bit jumpy when it comes to acquiring and playing replacement (or below replacement) level talent based on the argument that they were good at one point and just to recapture their perceived former glory.
Where has Dusty said anything about a possible future for Matthews? Here's the quotes from Fay's story on 6/25:

Newly signed Gary Matthews Jr. has leadoff experience.

"He's got to get his act together first," Baker said. "How are you going to do that without getting your act together? Matthews is going to Triple-A to get his act together.

"If he had his act together, he'd be playing somewhere and probably leading off."


Really, a number of us having been saying that folks need to just relax. I'm reminded of the scene in Moonstruck where Cher slaps Nicholas Cage and says "Snap out of it!". Sure this club has made some moves over the last ten years that make you want to pound your head against the wall, but overall this regime hasn't done much of that and certainly not with this team, who happens, by the way, to be in first place. How do we celebrate that? Two angst ridden threads worrying that Gary Matthews Jr may some day bat as a Cincinnati Red. Holy Cow, the sky is falling. My sarcasm isn't directed at your specifically, but wow we're beating this GMJ horse six ways to Saturday and probably coming back for more after that.
__________________
“In the same way that a baseball season never really begins, it never really ends either.” - Lonnie Wheeler, "Bleachers, A Summer in Wrigley Field"

The Baseball Emporium - Books & Things, that's Rallyonion.com

The Baseball Bookstore

http://tsc-sales.com/
http://tscsales.blogspot.com/
http://silverscreenbooks.com/
redsmetz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 04:55 PM   #12
Scrap Irony
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
I don't think people are bashing Matthews himself. We all know who he is; a replacement level player getting paid much more than that.

The "bashing" is of Jocketty for picking up a replacement level player for a position where we already have a good amount of depth and of Dusty for talking about his possible future in Cincinnati, when we already have 5 above replacement level OFs in the majors.

Obviously anything management says in the press about a guy's future should be taken with a grain of salt, but you can't blame us for being a bit jumpy when it comes to acquiring and playing replacement (or below replacement) level talent based on the argument that they were good at one point and just to recapture their perceived former glory.
No, it's Jocketty AND Matthews AND (somehow) Baker.

I'm hoping it's just that there's so little to complain about.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
-- Christy Matthewson
"Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
-- Leo Durocher
Scrap Irony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 05:31 PM   #13
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,029
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRF View Post
nobody is doing that. I just want him to be Gary Matthews Jr. That oughta do it.
no ones doing that, OK
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 06:06 PM   #14
TRF
Vavasor
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,680
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

Quote:
Originally Posted by icehole3 View Post
no ones doing that, OK
Maybe a few are. I figure he'll be what he is, a mid 30's player with a weak bat that plays at best an average CF. He might get hot at AAA, but I don't want him taking PT from Heisey if Stubbs is the odd man out. And like woy says, Stubbs is going to get a lot of rope. I see no immediate future for him except at Heisey's expense.

That'd be a shame.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar."
TRF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 06:10 PM   #15
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,384
Re: I guess Gary Matthews is the new Reds player to bash

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRF View Post
Maybe a few are. I figure he'll be what he is, a mid 30's player with a weak bat that plays at best an average CF. He might get hot at AAA, but I don't want him taking PT from Heisey if Stubbs is the odd man out. And like woy says, Stubbs is going to get a lot of rope. I see no immediate future for him except at Heisey's expense.

That'd be a shame.
Heisey riding he bench and getting 8 ab's a week is a bigger shame, he needs reps
westofyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25