![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
On replacing Harang
I'm taking my post from the game thread, I don't want to clog that up anymore as I'm trying to follow the game as well.
------------------------------------ Harang's getting paid that money regardless. We can't just say *poof* I want a top line starter, Aaron you're not getting paid anything the rest of the year. If we get a top line starter, the team trading him won't take Harang back. So if you assume you're paying Harang for the rest of the year regardless, you pitch the guy who gives you the best chance to win on a given night. Now again Harang had a horrible April and has pitched markedly better since May. Leake had a fabulous April and May and has pitched okay since then. So if you're trying to figure out who's going to have the best next month, or two months- do you a) Take the guy who's been pitching better for the last month, has a history of throwing 200 innings, and has been pretty reliable for years- or b) Take the rookie pitcher who has no history, has been beaten around a little bit in the past month, is roughly 5-6 starts from hitting his highest innings pitched for the year? Now there's obviously an added benefit to getting Leake some more starts to build him up for next year, Harang's of no value to the Reds come October 31, but based solely on who's going to give us the best chance to win a game, I'm taking Harang every time.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,917
|
Re: On replacing Harang
I as I think I showed pretty clearly in another thread, Harang is who we thought he is -- so long as you didn't expect him to regain 2005-2007 form. We can expect a 4.50ish ERA and lots of innings moving forward. He is not an ace by any stretch, but he belongs in the rotation.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,618
|
Re: On replacing Harang
Quote:
I am content with a rotation of Arroyo Cueto Volquez Leake Haren/Carmona With Bailey being the wild card as to spelling Leake or into the pen. I do know this that if I had to pick one starter to pitch a big game it isn't Harang. If I am setting up a rotation for a playoff series Harang isn't in there. Sure he isn't the worst pitcher, but he isn't a pitcher who is significantly better than what the Reds already have or who the Reds have the ability to go out and trade for. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: On replacing Harang
If Harang continues on the trajectory he's set up since May 2.
You're looking at 90-100IP over 15-16 starts, about 6 IP per game and about 2-3 Runs per game.(Closer to 3.) Even if they get a top line starter, I'm not sure I pick 4 other Reds to have a good chance to better that on a night in night out basis.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,917
|
Re: On replacing Harang
I believe Harang will have an equal or lower ERA than Mike Leake from this point forward and Leake doesn't have the innings left to finish the season.
Even if the Reds land an impact starter, he's still among the 4 best remaining candidates (Cueto, Arroyo, Harang, and Volquez or Bailey)
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,831
|
Re: On replacing Harang
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Vancouver, Wa
Posts: 8,216
|
Re: On replacing Harang
The numbers say he is throwing the majority of his fastballs now at 88-89, topping out at 91. He threw several 87 mph fastballs today, I don't recall seeing that.
Earlier this year, he was his usual self, averaging 91-92, topping out just above that. Perhaps it's a change in strategy w/ Price, but my concern at this point is a potential injury or fatigue. I'm very fine for this year w/ Aaron at 4.50 earnie and a .500 record.....but he seems on the precipice of disaster most outings these days.
__________________
“Our team is a team full of fighters. They never panic. We don't necessarily get all the hits we want all the time, but we find a way to win.” – Dusty Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Licking County Settlers
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 6,174
|
Re: On replacing Harang
Quote:
Again, I think he's going to be a fine pitcher, but he's got some learning and maturing to do.
__________________
"three dimes, a one hundred dollar bill and and 87 ones..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,629
|
Re: On replacing Harang
I may be in the minority, but I would feel more comfortable counting on Harang this year than counting on Bailey if both are healthy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: On replacing Harang
I tend to agree.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: On replacing Harang
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: On replacing Harang
Quote:
I think hes working at 87-88 mph on purpose (better control?). He showed in the 1st inning that he can still hit 93 mph, but sat around 87-90 mph most of the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,629
|
Re: On replacing Harang
I think you would be surprised how many people on RZ would prefer Bailey over Harang this year. That may be slightly lessened by Bailey's injury...but I think my view is in the minority.
I think Harang's numbers will only get better as the season goes on. I saw him pitch yesterday and even though the mistake pitch he made was costly, he looked good on the mound. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,618
|
Re: On replacing Harang
Quote:
But with regards to the entire rotation the only player who I don't see having a future with the Reds is Harang. I would feel much more comfortable going forward with one of Lee/Haren/Carmona and then one of Bailey/Leake than Harang and one of Bailey and Leake. I am not necessarily saying that Bailey or Leake are better right now than Harang (although I think it is debatable) but Lee/Haren/Carmona >>> Harang. Lets also not forget that over the last 2.5 seasons Harang is 18-38. Granted it isn't all on him but going forward this season it isn't going to be pitching "unlucky" its going to be about winning games. IMO I feel much more comfortable with one of three above mentioned players winning more games than Harang. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |