RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Archives > The Archives

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-07-2010, 06:50 AM   #496
Eric_the_Red
Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy
 
Eric_the_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,171
Re: Cliff Lee

The Reds have gotta get Lee. He has his own theme song:

YouTube - Tenacious D - Lee (Live) - with Dave Grohl
Eric_the_Red is offline  
Turn Off Ads?
Old 07-07-2010, 07:36 AM   #497
Cedric
Member
 
Cedric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,230
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNext44 View Post
I could actually argue that Haren is better than Lee.

The last three years:

Haren

xFIP 3.25
WHIP 1.117
K/9 8.7
GB/FB 1.16

Lee

xFIP 3.50
WHIP 1.135
K/9 7.1
GB/FB 1.00

This year Lee has been better, but some of that is due to his pitching in Safco, as his xFIP indicates. He is actually more of a flyball pitcher than Haren, which is why some have concern over how good he will be in GABP.

Add in that Haren is under control for an extra year, and it's really hard to defend that Lee is light years better than Haren, if he is better at all.
Dan Haren has given up 138 hits in 123 innings, terrible.

There isn't a number in the world that shows Dan Haren is even remotely in the same league as Cliff Lee right now.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back.
Cedric is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 07:47 AM   #498
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,744
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbrake View Post
Not sure how people are worried about how Lee would hold up in GABP but think Haren is a good idea...I just don't get it.
You just stated a strawman. It isn't a comparison of Lee vs. Haren, it is the entire picture of what it would cost to get one vs. the other and the chance that either would improve the Reds chances of the postseason for this year and beyond.

The folks liking the Haren idea do not dismiss him for a slow start to this season (he just shut down the Cards in a recent start btw), like that he has a reasonable contract for two more years, and that he will not demand as much in a package. Throw in Drew and it is the type of deal that could make folks forget the names of the prospects.
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em
traderumor is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 08:13 AM   #499
kbrake
Member
 
kbrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,918
Re: Cliff Lee

So Haren and Drew will cost less than Lee? I don't get that. I understand that its total package Lee vs Haren but I don't think Haren will be much cheaper if any and I didn't see him carve up the Yankees in hitters parks last postseason.
kbrake is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 08:30 AM   #500
cincrazy
Member
 
cincrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Vienna, OH
Posts: 4,142
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
Look at Lee's numbers In GABP before selling the farm to get him, 4.91 ERA over 5 starts.
But how many of those starts occured during Lee's peak as a player during the last few years?

I think reading too much into Lee coming to GABP is silly. The guy dominated in Citizen's Bank last year, the ballpark isn't going to be a factor.

I can understand the argument made about prospects, and I can also understand the argument about targeting Dan Haren. But the ballpark argument doesn't stand on solid ground, IMO.

Either way, it's exciting. We're talking about ways this team can improve its stock for this yea to bolster its postseason chances, instead of talking about ways to help for the future .
cincrazy is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 08:34 AM   #501
Cyclone792
Playoffs
 
Cyclone792's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,239
Re: Cliff Lee

Alonso + Francisco + another piece of lesser value = do it.

I'm lukewarm on Mesoraco, and that'd be a pretty big price to pay if he was the third piece but I'd probably live with it.

As far as I'm concerned, so long as Alonso is unable to play the outfield, he should be prime trade bait. Additionally, so long as Juan Francisco fails to comprehend what ball four is, I have very little use for him. Lottery ticket players - he's a new version of WMP - are guys I'm just not very interested in. Let Seattle figure out if Francisco will eventually figure out what pitches not to swing at.

Travis Wood is the one rumored Reds prospect that I'd like to keep, if at all possible. If he was the third piece, then Cliff Lee would probably have to win Games 1/4/7 in the World Series for me to be content.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012

Put an end to the Lost Decade.
Cyclone792 is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 08:47 AM   #502
Reds Freak
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,093
Re: Cliff Lee

34 pages on Cliff Lee? This discussion is starting to remind me of the Erik Bedard threads from a few years ago...
__________________
"In our sundown perambulations of late, through the outer parts of Brooklyn, we have observed several parties of youngsters playing 'base', a certain game of ball. Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our close rooms, the game of ball is glorious"
-Walt Whitman
Reds Freak is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 09:11 AM   #503
lollipopcurve
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,585
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Alonso + Francisco + another piece of lesser value = do it.

Too much. The Reds don't have much power in the minors after these two. If Votto or Bruce or Rolen goes down, you need a stick behind them -- whether it's this year or beyond.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini
lollipopcurve is online now  
Old 07-07-2010, 09:13 AM   #504
dunner13
Member
 
dunner13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 593
Re: Cliff Lee

Everyone is pretty much assuming that lee will just be a rental. But if Lee helps us get deep into the playoffs and the reds and fans really reach out to him I would have to think theres a chance he would stay. With Harang and Arroyos contracts done after this year and Cast probably being willing to raise the payroll if we make the playoffs we could possibly offer Lee the 18-20 mill a year he wants. I understand that the most likely scenario is that he signs with the yankees in the offseason but I would have to think we could at least try to sign him. Which would make giving up good prospects for him much easier to swallow.
dunner13 is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 09:17 AM   #505
Dan
OlafTheBlack
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 2,059
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclone792 View Post
Alonso + Francisco + another piece of lesser value = do it.

I'm lukewarm on Mesoraco, and that'd be a pretty big price to pay if he was the third piece but I'd probably live with it.

As far as I'm concerned, so long as Alonso is unable to play the outfield, he should be prime trade bait. Additionally, so long as Juan Francisco fails to comprehend what ball four is, I have very little use for him. Lottery ticket players - he's a new version of WMP - are guys I'm just not very interested in. Let Seattle figure out if Francisco will eventually figure out what pitches not to swing at.

Travis Wood is the one rumored Reds prospect that I'd like to keep, if at all possible. If he was the third piece, then Cliff Lee would probably have to win Games 1/4/7 in the World Series for me to be content.
I would do Alonso-Francisco-Wood for Lee in about 12.5 seconds.

I wonder if they'd do Mez-Francisco-Wood instead.

BTW, Wood will have to be a part of this. He's our best LH prospect and Seattle is going to want at least 1 ML ready pitcher.
__________________
Genius|Madness

"Somebody will be bigger, stronger and faster than you, growing up," Griffey said with a shrug. "So why worry about it? As long as you don't let them outwork you, and you can look yourself in the mirror, then that's all you should worry about. Never worry about what somebody else is doing."
Dan is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 09:20 AM   #506
lollipopcurve
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,585
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
I would do Alonso-Francisco-Wood for Lee in about 12.5 seconds.
Crazy.

There are lots of ways to improve the team. Throwing 3 of your top 5/6 prospects (in a good system) at a two-month rental is a good way to blow up a plan to build a team that competes for an extended window of time.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini
lollipopcurve is online now  
Old 07-07-2010, 09:22 AM   #507
savafan
Maple SERP
 
savafan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,486
Re: Cliff Lee

Could the Reds beat a package for Lee that includes B.J. Upton?

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/rumors/p...urn=mlb,254202
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos.

If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't.
savafan is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 09:38 AM   #508
Plus Plus
Red Ox Dynasty
 
Plus Plus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,322
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by savafan View Post
Could the Reds beat a package for Lee that includes B.J. Upton?

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/rumors/p...urn=mlb,254202
Easily. "Bossman Junior" Upton is one of the most overhyped, underproducing players in MLB today. He hasn't come near a .800 ops in any of the last three seasons, including a whopping .686 last year and .711 this year. With his current payscale and arb status, I wouldn't be surprised if Heisey had similar or greater value right now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
Thus his team was punished

Long live punishment
Plus Plus is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 10:00 AM   #509
Dan
OlafTheBlack
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 2,059
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
Crazy.

There are lots of ways to improve the team. Throwing 3 of your top 5/6 prospects (in a good system) at a two-month rental is a good way to blow up a plan to build a team that competes for an extended window of time.
Do you want to compete, or do you want to win the World Series? I think Lee takes us to that level this year.
__________________
Genius|Madness

"Somebody will be bigger, stronger and faster than you, growing up," Griffey said with a shrug. "So why worry about it? As long as you don't let them outwork you, and you can look yourself in the mirror, then that's all you should worry about. Never worry about what somebody else is doing."
Dan is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 10:21 AM   #510
Cyclone792
Playoffs
 
Cyclone792's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,239
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
Too much. The Reds don't have much power in the minors after these two. If Votto or Bruce or Rolen goes down, you need a stick behind them -- whether it's this year or beyond.
I think you may be valuing those guys a bit more than they're worth. I've been less than impressed with the performances of both Alonso and Francisco, and I'm not very high on their long-term potential.

It's an interesting twist of events; the Reds haven't been able to develop pitching for well ... eternity. But suddenly now I'm more confident in their pitching prospects than their hitting prospects.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012

Put an end to the Lost Decade.
Cyclone792 is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25