RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > Minor League Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2011, 08:24 AM   #166
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,410
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsof72 View Post
Torreyes is a middle infielder. They already have middle infielders in Dayton who have to play everyday. If you took the money out of the equation and just played your best team, you would call Torreyes up to Dayton, play him at short, and move Hamilton to second. But it doesn't work that way. If it did, Yorman would be in Goodyear right now.

When they agree to give a guy $365,000 or whatever they gave Lohman, you are making a commitment that you are going to play the player until he proves he can't play. You are making that commitment to your scouting department. That is the way the thing works.

Yes, at some point, Lohman has to start to show something. The scout who signed him is sure hoping so, too.
I didn't like the Lohman pick at the time, and it's not looking too good now.

72, you really think Torreyes plays SS over Hamilton? I always assumed it would be the other way around (with Torreyes at 2B).
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is online now   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 05-25-2011, 11:37 AM   #167
redsof72
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 832
Re: Ronald Torreyes

The comment that Torreyes would play short and Hamilton at second was based on what would be the best defensive infield on May 25, 2011. I am not ready to say that this would be the best in the long run, although it may be.

For those who have seen Hamilton defensively, you have seen what I have seen and written about. For those who have not, here are the basics:

He will make plays that virtually no other shortstop in pro ball will make. He made a play Thursday night on a fly ball to left that no shortstop ever makes, period, in which he caught a looper on a spot on the field that would be described as where the left fielder might play if he was playing shallow.

He has 18 errors in 42 games and a fielding percentage of under .900. His hands look iffy. He struggles to react to any kind of tricky hop. He has a tendency to drop his elbow on throws which leads to a submarine style throw to first and causes the ball to go high. Virtually all of his throwing errors (maybe 7 or 8 of his errors) are because of this mechanical problem. They are trying to get him to understand the importance of working on the correct throwing technique (see recent 3-day "break"). I do believe he can develop a good work ethic once he gains some maturity and figures out what it means to have to work to get better. He is a good kid who wants to do the right things.
redsof72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 12:21 AM   #168
11larkin11
Member
 
11larkin11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bellefontaine,OH
Posts: 2,287
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Boy, I can't wait until Torreyes advances and we can see his swing-and-miss percentage. I haven't seen him in person, but his eye-poppingly low K numbers seems like he is Starlin Castro, without the backwards K's.
__________________
Domo Arigato, Here Comes Joey Votto

---TRF

"I do what I want to do and say what I want to say."

--Bronson Arroyo
11larkin11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 09:35 AM   #169
membengal
Member
 
membengal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,379
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Perusing the comments ar redreporter to their minors wrap for the day, it was noted that ben badler from or affiliated with BA recently opined that torreyes is the best prospect in dayton. For what its worth.
membengal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 09:40 AM   #170
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,677
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Quote:
Originally Posted by membengal View Post
Perusing the comments ar redreporter to their minors wrap for the day, it was noted that ben badler from or affiliated with BA recently opined that torreyes is the best prospect in dayton. For what its worth.
He is certainly the best player on the team right now. I am positive that I wouldn't rank him ahead of Corcino or Yorman Rodriguez right now. Also about 95% sure that I wouldn't rank him above Billy Hamilton either.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 06:12 PM   #171
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,928
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
He is certainly the best player on the team right now. I am positive that I wouldn't rank him ahead of Corcino or Yorman Rodriguez right now. Also about 95% sure that I wouldn't rank him above Billy Hamilton either.
In terms of a futures grade, that is completely logical. But in terms of current grade, yeah I'm having a hard time favoring any of them over Torreyes.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 06:48 PM   #172
mdccclxix
Member
 
mdccclxix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,652
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Closest comp for young Midwest league players I could find:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/mi...d=burrou001sea

Sean Burroughs
mdccclxix is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 06:52 PM   #173
mdccclxix
Member
 
mdccclxix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,652
Re: Ronald Torreyes

I skipped 2010, but here's this one:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/mi...d=trout-001mik

Mike Trout

Just going by 18 year olds in the Midwest League with averages above .340 or so.
mdccclxix is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 06:55 PM   #174
partisan
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 97
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
He is certainly the best player on the team right now. I am positive that I wouldn't rank him ahead of Corcino or Yorman Rodriguez right now. Also about 95% sure that I wouldn't rank him above Billy Hamilton either.
There's no way I'd put Hamilton above Torreyes. Billy clearly has a much higher ceiling but frankly he just looks silly way too often in the field and the plate for me.

If he learns some plate discipline and how to not throw the ball into the dugout, then he becomes a monster. But until then, Ronald is higher on my list.
partisan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 07:28 PM   #175
Scrap Irony
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Trout was among his closest comps in the Rookie Leagues as well.

Let's hope he continues to hit like that kid.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
-- Christy Matthewson
"Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
-- Leo Durocher
Scrap Irony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 07:31 PM   #176
The DARK
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 940
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Trout was among his closest comps in the Rookie Leagues as well.

Let's hope he continues to hit like that kid.
Meanwhile, Torreyes brings his plus defense to a MI position. If he keeps up his production, he could be scary good.
The DARK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 07:33 PM   #177
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,677
Re: Ronald Torreyes

The problem with comps to Trout or Burroughs is that those guys were much bigger people. Statistical comps are nice, but they only go so far.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 07:35 PM   #178
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,677
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Quote:
Originally Posted by partisan View Post
There's no way I'd put Hamilton above Torreyes. Billy clearly has a much higher ceiling but frankly he just looks silly way too often in the field and the plate for me.

If he learns some plate discipline and how to not throw the ball into the dugout, then he becomes a monster. But until then, Ronald is higher on my list.
I don't worry about his throwing. He will be fine in time. I just see more upside with Hamilton, enough that his current skillset being worse is offset. Hamilton is a special type of defender. He gets to baseball that good shortstops only dream about. I have seen enough flashes at the plate to know he is capable of being a solid offensive guy if he finds more consistency.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 08:10 PM   #179
Scrap Irony
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
Re: Ronald Torreyes

I understand what you're saying, doug. But, again, almost all males (98%, in fact) gaing both weight and muscle as they age. Unless he's an extreme outlier, Torryes will gain 20 lbs. or more before he hits the show. (If he hits the show.)

Add to that players like Rafael Furcal (who was smaller than Torreyes at the same age), Dustin Pedroia (who was the same size), and others-- all of whom have had success as major league players-- and your insistence that his size will somehow hold him back seems a bit... inflexible.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
-- Christy Matthewson
"Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
-- Leo Durocher
Scrap Irony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 08:12 PM   #180
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,677
Re: Ronald Torreyes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
I understand what you're saying, doug. But, again, almost all males (98%, in fact) gaing both weight and muscle as they age. Unless he's an extreme outlier, Torryes will gain 20 lbs. or more before he hits the show. (If he hits the show.)

Add to that players like Rafael Furcal (who was smaller than Torreyes at the same age), Dustin Pedroia (who was the same size), and others-- all of whom have had success as major league players-- and your insistence that his size will somehow hold him back seems a bit... inflexible.
Torreyes + 20 pounds is still 40-60 pounds lighter than the guys he was compared to. Still, I don't think he is gong to add 20 pounds or more in the next 4 years.

And I don't think I have ever said his size will hold him back. I am saying that others size may help them improve certain aspects of their game (power) moving forward.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25