![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 53
|
Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
Okay...not to jinx anything, but I've been thinking about this a lot. I feel like one of the reasons the Cards beat us up is that Larussa essentially set their rotation playoff style, and, while the Reds appear to be the better team over the long haul, the Cards are built more for the postseason with that killer top of the rotation.
So, if/when we make the postseason, how does our rotation go? Who starts game 1? A lot can happen between then and now, but I think I'd go with something like this: 1. Travis Wood 2. Bronson Arroyo 3. Johnny Cueto. - 4. Homer Bailey 5. Edinson Volquez That looks a bit crazy, what with Wood being so young and inexperienced, but he looks excellent whenever he starts. I don't see Volquez starting in the postseason unless he has to, but I could see Bailey bumping Cueto to the 4 spot if he continues to look as good as he did in his first start back. I love this team, and they're built to win a lot of games, I'm just not sure how we'll look in October. Anyway, I'm curious as to what others think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 282
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
if your going by who to start for game 1, you have to look at arroyo..HE's the ace of this staff imho. HE will be your game 1 starter then, maybe wood or volquez but, you go with what got you there and bronson has been giving the reds everything this season, can't go wrong with him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 136
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
Cueto is a lock. He has had a great season.
Including Wood is definitely an option at this point. I had been thinking Volquez would be in the top 3 with all the talk (it's like adding a TOR starter when he returns yada yada yada), but he has been inconsistent. Still have over a month to see who has the hot hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
13 Belongs in Cooperstown
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 797
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
I say they should base it off of September, so I have no idea who it would be.
__________________
I still listen to Marty and Joe regardless of who is really in the booth. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cincy
Posts: 498
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
Cueto and Arroyo are the automatics.
Volquez and Wood, it all depends how they pitch between now and then. I still haven't ruled out Bailey personally. He was awesome to close last season and I have a gut feeling that he may be our hottest pitcher heading into the playoffs this year.
__________________
RALLY CAPS! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,121
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
Not to be snarky or all but if Arroyo is your starter in game one and it happens to be against the Phillies, the Reds might see an early exit in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Umm...Bama
Posts: 764
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,121
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
Quote:
I believe that one of the reasons why the Cards failed last year was because they started Carpenter rather than Wainwright. Carpenter is a great pitcher but he is more pitch to contact and a ground ball pitcher. Waino is just mean and I think maybe that series could have been different if he started that game and dominated the Doyers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 56
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
You guys are playing absolutely amazing baseball. And I'll admit; you're a much better "team" than my Cards. But as an impartial baseball fan, I must say, you're starting rotation in a series is not imposing. That's the only thing you'll have to worry about, should you continue this lead and win the division.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,299
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
I am sure Dusty would go with BA first. After that, I know I am in the minority but give me Travis Wood in a game 2. The kid has been consistently good each time. Bailey is throwing well and he would be my third game.
Cueto still worries me at times, as he seems like he could get rattled if a bloop and an error happened. Also..if playing a team like the Phils with Utley,Howard, Ibaneaz etc, Wood would be a major key. Still a long way to go but fun to think about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,554
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
Starters' ERAs of contending teams since July 1st:
Code:
TEAM ERA BRAVES 2.86 REDS 3.22 PHILS 3.42 CARDS 3.46 PADRES 3.69 GIANTS 3.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
If Volquez gets his command where it needs to be over the rest of this season it's
1. Arroyo 2. Cueto 3. Volquez If not drop Volquez for Bailey/Wood depending on how they finish the year out. That would be my top 3 anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Peekskill,NY
Posts: 112
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
I think I'd go
1. Arroyo 2. Cueto 3. Wood |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 818
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,251
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...Playoffs
Travis Wood has been awesome, but I wouldn't start a rookie in Game One of the postseason. I would go Arroyo (because of his age) and then Cueto. Tough call after that.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |