![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
2 in 3 years!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,277
|
Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Let's get it rollin'. Goin' for win #1!
320
__________________
I'd rather listen to Kelch read the phone book than suffer through Thom Brennaman's attempt to make every instance on the field the most important event since the discovery of manned space flight. -westofyou |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Bengals run the ball a ton in the first half and go 3 and out 3 times.
2nd half they throw it and score 21 points. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
I have a bad feeling this one is going to be ugly.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Spread them out and use Scott and Leonard as emergency dump offs out of the backfield and I can see them having some success. Try to pound the ball over and over and it could end up being a long day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,133
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
It's way to early for a game to be a must-win, but this game should give us a good barometer of where this season is heading. After being completely mishandled last week (the score doesn't even do justice, IMO), we're at home playing a good team we beat twice last season.
Entering this season, I had my doubts about this team -- when you talk about the parity of the NFL, our difficult schedule, and the Bengals ineptitude when it comes to consistency and expectations over all. So a loss today wouldn't shock me by any means, but it would definitely put a wrench into the postseason talk.
__________________
That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch. -Steve Stone |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Would love to see Scott mixed in here today. Ravens were surprised by Benson last season they won't make the same mistake again. Ray Lewis talked about Benson's patience this week with the media. Throwing Scott's style at them for 10 -12 touches will help keep them off balance.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Why did they go with Scott instead of Benson on that 3rd &1? Doesn't make a lot of sense.
They've tried to run Benson outside, now they send Scott up the middle. Uh... huh. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Benson looking very 2009 which answers all the haters that said he would regress in 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Did anyone read Mel Kiper's take on Carson coming out of the draft? Via Lance's Blog.
Mel on Carson....back then From Mel Kiper's 2003 Draft Report Negatives: Lacks a quick arm like Elway or Mike Vick and has some windup and three-quarters arm delivery. Forces ball, making dumb mistakes at times. Doesn't have much personality or fire and is a marginal leader, who seems to lack the persona to attract teammates as followers. Average scrambler. Has short accuracy and is inconsistent on short-to-medium and long passes. Erratic, hot-and-cold player who lacks velocity on deep out. Does not have great instincts and intelligence or IQ. Streaky and loses poise and confidence. Can improve technique and accuracy. Slow reactor. Lacks field vision. Better in rhythm system. Ran a limited offense and loses accuracy when pressured, but he will throw away and take a sack. Good but not great arm. Has questionable mental toughness and is questionable at handling pressure. Tends to bird-dog his primary receiver. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Carson is lucky he doesn't have about 7 INTs so far. He's making some awful throws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,133
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
7 INTs is pretty rough. I can really only see 2 INTs. But with that said, he should also have atleast 2 TDs. I don't know how he missed CJ in the endzone. Palmer's not exactly proving his critics wrong with this game that's been full of missed opportunities.
Concerning the Ravens, is Flacco really their future QB? He looks like Kyler Boller back there.
__________________
That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch. -Steve Stone |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,123
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
The Ravens make adjustments, the Bengals don't.
TD Ravens.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Quote:
:Quote:
And as I type that, The Ravens go ahead 7-6. Aye. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
Have they even gone no huddle at all today. Frustrating not being able to move the ball at all whether its the Ravens or not.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Week 2- Bengals vs. Ravens
They're going to regret not getting in the end zone. It's 15-10, but there's plenty of time.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |