![]() |
|
|
#61 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sellersburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,258
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
This is what happens when you let crappy football teams hang around. Now the Bengals are in a game.
__________________
DLC11@Insightbb.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
If The Bengals lose this game, I'd like to channel Jim Mora:
"Let me start off by saying one thing, DO NOT blame THAT game on the defense." |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,127
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
Carolina scoring is an embarrassment. The team should forfeit the game.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
Probably should have activated Andre Smith so you could use him on short yardage plays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
I do really like Jordan Shipley.
Some serious weapons of this offense if Carson wasn't playing like crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
Shaq might have been able to catch that one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
Roland getting exposed again on that 3rd down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
It looks like everyone is on a different page right now.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,219
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
The Bengals still have some terrible players. Overall the depth is better.. Dennis Roland starting an NFL game is a joke though. I almost laughed on that 3rd down play.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
|
Big 50 yard FG by Nugent
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
Quote:
Starting to think these guys get a lifetime gig. No accountability whatsoever. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
This just in - Mike Nugent's got more leg than Shayne Graham.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
Mike Brown and has loyalties to players who don't produce and coaches who can't coach.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Week 3: Bengals at the Panthers
Nugent has been a great upgrade, Graham used to give me that CoCo feeling ever time he tired to kick a FG.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |