![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
2 in 3 years!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,277
|
A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
What's the lamest Fall Classic you remember? One where you said, "These are the two best teams. Wow." Just curious.
320
__________________
I'd rather listen to Kelch read the phone book than suffer through Thom Brennaman's attempt to make every instance on the field the most important event since the discovery of manned space flight. -westofyou |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,934
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
I don't think I've ever felt that way about any series, as I know it's not about being the best teams sometimes.
But the White Sox - Astros came the closest for me.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
The Cardinals making their appearance in 2006 boasting 83 wins in the regular season didn't sit very well with me.
And then they won it, proving anything can happen in the postseason. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,493
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
I believe it was 1973 when the Mets made the World Series against Oakland with a record just over .500. They had beaten the Reds in the NLCS when Dan Driessen proved he was definitely not a third baseman.
__________________
"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."- Noam Chomsky |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
RZ Chamber of Commerce
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 13,225
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
The '82 series comes to mind for me. I wasn't impressed with the Brewers. Harvey's Wallbangers seemed like a bunch of slobs with too much facial hair and too few unheralded starters. They were a real contrast to the Cards, who had better pitching and loads of speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
Good question. I have no facts to back this up, but I remember thinking, "What are the Angels and Giants doing in the World Series?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,123
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
Much like Kal above mentioned, I have no real basis, but I recall the 87 series and thinking to myself....these aren't very exciting teams. Twins vs Cards.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,384
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
1987 Cardinals vs Twins - Twins really?
1973 Mets vs A's - Both beat better teams in the playoffs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
Quote:
For me, I have a hard time even accepting Tampa bay as a real team.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Churlish
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,667
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
The lamest was 1994.
As for the lamest matchup, I vote for the ChiSox/Houston yawner. That was actually a pretty good series.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Beer is good!!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,128
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
Quote:
The pitching staff with Pete Vuckovich and Mike Caldwell as the two top starters was ok at best. But all in all I thought they were very worthy of playing in the WS.
__________________
"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,815
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
For me it was 1973 Mets vs A's for obvious reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
OlafTheBlack
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 2,037
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
I'm with you. The 1987 Series was a pretty good one. That Twins team was solid, with Puckett, Hrbek, Gaetti, Brunansky, Viola, Blyleven, Rearden.
__________________
Genius|Madness "Somebody will be bigger, stronger and faster than you, growing up," Griffey said with a shrug. "So why worry about it? As long as you don't let them outwork you, and you can look yourself in the mirror, then that's all you should worry about. Never worry about what somebody else is doing." |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hey Cubs Fans
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 16,567
|
Re: A question for longtime baseball fans (Re: the World Series)
1973 - That year still hurts.
__________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." ~ Mark Twain |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |