![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Brett William Moore
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crescent Springs KY
Posts: 3,511
|
Scott Podsednick
Here is yet another musing on how Scott Podsednick is a good fit for the Reds who 'need a leadoff batter for left field'. http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2010/1...ee-agents.html
I keep reading these speculations & the more I read them the more I get that slight nausea feeling rising up from my stomach. Please Walt: NO!!!!!!!!!! 1) he was a 0.4 WAR player last year 2) in the last 4 years he has a total of 0.9 WAR 3) he has no power 4) if he could play a strong centerfield he would have some value. however, he isn't a good defender even in left 5) Lance Nix ( 2.6 WAR total over the last two years) is a better player than Podsednick & I want a guy like Lance on the bench not as a starter 6) in short he would not help the team The Reds need strong offensive production from whoever plays left field. Its left field not shortstop. Its one of THE key spots where a team needs a thumper. At a minimum we need a LH version of Gomes to make a platoon (and I would like to aim higher than that). Lets all hope Walt is a lot smarter than all the folks in the media who seem to think the Reds should get Podsednick.
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,823
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
Last year he had a 1.8 WAR, according to Fangraphs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,013
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
I am not sure what happened to Scotty Pods in '06,'07, and '08, but he really fell off and fell off quick. However the last 2 seasons, he has been a .4 WAR player and a 1.8 WAR player. His production really fell off once he came to the Dodgers, and it seems over his career he has played much, much better in the AL vs. the NL. While I am not supporting the acquisition of Podsednik to fill our LF hole, he is not nearly as bad as the OP is making him seem. There are worse alternatives, but wouldn't spend more than 2 mil on a shot at Podsednik.
__________________
"Today was the byproduct of us thinking we can come back from anything." - Joey Votto after blowing a 10-1 lead and holding on for the 12-11 win on 8/25/2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,659
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
I want no part of Podsednik. I was hoping he would remain with the Dodgers just so it would eliminate any chance of the Reds signing him.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,017
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
I think Walt is smart enough to avoid Posednick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
Taveras was a plus defending CF. Pods is a poor defending LF.
Pods' WAR per fangraphs: 2007: -0.1 2008: -0.4 2009: 1.8 2010: 0.4
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,823
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,688
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
Ever watch him play? I'll take Gomes. Or Dunn. He's a better defender than 2005 and later Griffey (the worst I've ever seen IMO). Overall, he's better than Willy. After that, please keep this guy away from our team.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,823
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
I haven't watched him enough to make any comment on his fielding, to be honest. I'm curious as to the outright hatred for this guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
I've watched him play LF many times both in person and on TV. UZR thinks he's performed poorly. The Fans Scouting Report has him at exactly average. The only thing he does well is run fast.
Perhaps "poor" is too strong. How about below average? Mediocre? Does it matter?
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,659
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
I've never been overly impressed with Podsednik's defense. His arm is among the worst in all of baseball.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,823
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
Quote:
UZR shows him as "poor" only last year, looking fairly average on the whole (if I am reading that correctly).. If he is in fact average then characterizing him as poor is pretty inaccurate, IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,815
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,815
|
Re: Scott Podsednick
Quote:
Don't be fooled by seeing him make a diving catch every now and then. his speed has kept him from being down right awful. He gets a bad jump on the ball off the bat, he takes bad routs to the ball and he has a noodle arm. As for outright hatred I don't think any of us want him to burn in hell. We just don't want him in a Reds uniform. Last edited by Ron Madden; 11-09-2010 at 03:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |