![]() |
|
|
#226 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,695
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 532
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
This cannot be said enough. While some of them haven't developed as I'd have hoped, I will forever be appreciative of what they did for this program. They took a leap of faith coming to a program in complete disarry and were a huge part of bringing the program back to respectability.
It's really nice to be back to playing meaningful basketball in March! |
|
|
|
|
|
#228 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milford, Clifton
Posts: 1,585
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
__________________
Follow me on twitter @EricLilly7 Check out my Reds blog! Hit me up with any advice on it at anytime, it's always appreciated. http://redscheatsheet.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229 | |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
Even if they get dumped in their first BE Tournament game, I can't see the Bearcats doing worse than a 7. The goal they need to be shooting for right now is winning a game or two next week and locking up a 6 seed. I don't think this team is good enough to win a conference championship, but their run in the NCAAs would be aided greatly if they can avoid facing a 1 or 2 in the second round.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 714
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
They will likely face Nova in the tournament. I actually like this matchup with the way Nova is playing, especially since we won't have to play them in their tiny gym. Win that and we will play Notre Dame I believe. If we win those two games we could be looking at a 5 seed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#231 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milford, Clifton
Posts: 1,585
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
__________________
Follow me on twitter @EricLilly7 Check out my Reds blog! Hit me up with any advice on it at anytime, it's always appreciated. http://redscheatsheet.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#232 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,695
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 266
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
I'm with you. I fear an 8 seed. But I'm trying to keep in mind that in the last five years I would have been jumping for joy just to have this discussion. And, if UC does get an 8 seed, let's hope they get lined up to play a team they'd really relish taking down (**AHEM** tOSU).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#234 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milford, Clifton
Posts: 1,585
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
No way UC gets an 8 seed. 7 seed minimum.
__________________
Follow me on twitter @EricLilly7 Check out my Reds blog! Hit me up with any advice on it at anytime, it's always appreciated. http://redscheatsheet.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#235 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
UC fans have to be happy about South Florida knocking off Villanova. What happened to Villanova? We've seen similar finishes in this city, unfortunately
|
|
|
|
|
|
#236 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 532
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
A win over USF will likely do very little for UC's seeding in the NCAA tournament and a loss would be without a doubt UC's worst of the season. Even with Villanova tanking down the stretch, a win over them may have been enough to move UC up another spot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cincinnati/Colerain
Posts: 1,247
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Well it does improve our likilihood in winning tonight and I want a matchup with Notre Dame tomorrow.
__________________
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/ShaneHorning |
|
|
|
|
|
#238 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,182
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Impressive showing by UC tonight. Gates was a monster. Lets hope that trend continues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#239 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 266
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
I'm interested to see what defensive gameplan Mick goes with against ND. UC has really been excelling when they mix in zones a lot. Against UConn I think they played strictly man, and UConn shot lights out that game.
Now, this is all a little counter-intuitive to the whole "zone-buster" mentality. Against Louisville, a good 3 pt shooting team, I think UC ran a 2-2-1 press into a 3-2 zone almost exclusively (I could be wrong, it was a while ago). Against Georgetown and Marquette (both good shooting teams) they've run a lot of zones and shut down their outside shooting. So, I guess my point is that Mick doesn't abandon the zone against ND just because they are so good at 3 point shooting. It's a really aggressive zone UC plays -- I'm impressed at how well they extend it and disrupt perimeter passing, and the rotations have been excellent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#240 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milford, Clifton
Posts: 1,585
|
Re: 2010/2011 UC Basketball official thread
Quote:
The tricky part is, they can respond well to pressure, and everyone on their team hits open threes. They are all experienced and can pass to the open man with no problem, so it's going to have to be a good press and we have to get back quickly. I think the Cats win 67-62...I have a good feeling, we have a lot of confidence and I think the D steps up.
__________________
Follow me on twitter @EricLilly7 Check out my Reds blog! Hit me up with any advice on it at anytime, it's always appreciated. http://redscheatsheet.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |