![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,419
|
Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
1 Year $3M.
Seems too much to me, but it's not my money. I see a big drop off from last season for Razor Ramon, and not even needed once Meseraco arrives. Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernadez
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Retro-Gamer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,646
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: mason
Posts: 656
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
Seems high to me too, but in reality 3M isn't much even for a backup these days. Hopefully Hanigan will get 4 of every 7 starts with Ramon getting the other 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,052
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
Basicaly agree.....Ramon was a great clutch hitter but even so, $3 million for a platoon catcher whose game calling is questionable is a bit much to me. I would have been ok with $2 million or so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
He sure could hit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 702
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
Did you guys see the list of available catchers through free agency? It was pathetic and Ramon was near the top and would have been highly sought after. 3 million might actually be a good deal for a catcher this offseason.
__________________
Check out SimLeague Baseball! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 6,954
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
Needed to be done.
Glad to get it out of the way early. Hanigan should get 3 out of 5 starts with Ramon getting 2 out of 5 starts. Baker doesn't like to give any of these Catchers 3 games in a row. Schedule will dictate more of the platoon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
DANG! Now I guess Hanigan can lead off and Hernandez can play 1B and we can move Alonso to LF full-time after we trade that greedy Votto for some awesome pitcher like Dan Qualls or Brandon Lyon...
SWEET! /all of SunDeck circa 2010 projections for Hanigan and Alonso and Votto...
__________________
I think that in a year or two, one of these guys - Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, Stubbs - will be ready to replace Dunn. They won't hit as many home runs as Dunn, but they should have similar OPS. - 757690, July 22, 2008 Alonso will be playing 1B for the REDS and batting 4th one year from today. - Kingspoint, July 9, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,281
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
I don't hate this deal. Its only 1 year, and i'm not sure Hanigan can be an every day catcher without wearing down. It's a low risk deal in my opinion, and they were a solid combo this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 246
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
I'm fine with the deal. Hernandez has a good rapport with the latin pitchers and with more expected from Aroldis in 2011 hopefully Ramon can ease his progression. He also has a good approach at the plate and is able work the count fouling off pitches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
.377 in 1905
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 1,538
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
Not a bad move. The catching corp was good this year, and should be somewhat similar in 2011, or until Mes is ready to take Ramon's spot.
__________________
...the 2-2 to Woodsen and here it comes...and it is swung on and missed! And Tom Browning has pitched a perfect game! Twenty-seven outs in a row, and he is being mobbed by his teammates, just to the thirdbase side of the mound. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
All work and no play.....
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,981
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
Kinda shocked people are dissing this move.
The catching tandem of Hernandez/Hanigan is a very good thing. Keeps both of them fresh. I think everyone knows that if Mez steps up, this will be Hernandez's last season with the Reds. But he has been a valuable cog, along with Hanigan. I expected this move and like this move for the short term.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic. "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 110
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
Thyis is a good sign, Ramon will be a good gate keeper untill Maesraco is ready.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Winning the Human Race
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,819
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
I see no downside. 3 MIL in this market for a good catcher is a steal. Mez is no sure-shot to be ready next year and, if he is, Razor is a very trade-able commodity at that price. No downside here.
__________________
Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Recovering Cubs Fan
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 711
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
I see some downside:
Cordero Hanigan 30.2 IP, 2.05 ERA Hernandez 29.1 IP, 6.44 ERA Miller 12.2 IP, 2.13 ERA Masset Hanigan 25.2 IP, 0.70 ERA Hernandez 42.2 IP, 5.27 ERA Miller 8.1 IP, 2.16 ERA Ondrusek Hanigan 15.2 IP, 4.02 ERA Hernandez 32.2 IP, 4.41 ERA Miller 10.1 IP 0.87 ERA Smith Hanigan 10.2 IP, 2.53 ERA Hernandez 20.1 IP, 4.43 ERA Miller 11.0 IP, 3.27 ERA Harang Hanigan 42.0 IP, 4.07 ERA Hernandez 56.2 IP, 6.99 ERA Miller 13.0 IP, 2.08 ERA Bailey Hanigan 83.1 IP, 3.24 ERA Hernandez 25.2 IP, 8.42 ERA Wood Hanigan 33.1 IP, 2.43 ERA Hernandez 51.2 IP, 4.35 ERA Miller 17.2 IP, 3.06 ERA Leake Hanigan 20.1 IP, 5.31 ERA Hernandez 103.2 IP, 3.99 ERA Miller 14.1 IP, 4.40 ERA Volquez Hanigan 8.1 IP, 7.56 ERA Hernandez 54.1 IP, 3.81 ERA LeCure Hanigan 11.0 IP, 1.64 ERA Hernandez 29.2 IP, 5.46 ERA Miller 7.1 IP, 4.91 ERA Cueto Hanigan 6.0 IP, 3.00 ERA Hernandez 160.0 IP, 3.94 ERA Miller 19.2 IP, 1.37 ERA Arroyo Hanigan 162.1 IP, 3.94 ERA Hernandez 10.1 IP, 6.10 ERA Miller 43.0 IP, 3.14 ERA Rhodes Hanigan 20.2 IP, 3.05 ERA Hernandez 26.1 IP, 1.71 ERA Miller 8.0 IP, 2.25 ERA Owings Hanigan 11.0 IP, 1.64 ERA Hernandez 18.2 IP, 6.75 ERA Miller 3.2 IP, 9.82 ERA Bray Hanigan 12.0 IP, 1.50 ERA Hernandez 14.0 IP, 5.79 ERA Miller 2.1 IP, 7.71 ERA Herrera Hanigan 5.0 IP, 1.80 ERA Hernandez 13.0 IP, 4.85 ERA Miller 5.0 IP, 3.60 ERA Fisher Hanigan 10.1 IP, 3.48 ERA Hernandez 9.0 IP, 10.00 ERA Miller 3.0 IP, 0.00 ERA Chapman Hanigan 5.1 IP, 0.00 ERA Hernandez 7.0 IP, 3.86 ERA Miller 1.0 IP, 0.00 ERA Yes, this is simplified. But it's an unmistakable pattern: The Reds' pitchers are almost ALL significantly worse with Hernandez behind the plate. If he's the personal catcher for Cueto and Volquez and not much else, he's fine. And it would be nice if there was a way to keep him the hell away from all the relievers except for Rhodes. Seriously, the Reds would be better off without him, IMO. Catcher's ERA Hanigan 3.39 Hernandez 4.77 Miller 2.86
__________________
FIRE DUSTY Never mind. The man is clearly a genius. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 231
|
Re: Reds Re-Sign Ramon Hernandez
Solid signing.
If Hernandez shows a remarkable decline and Mesoraco proves to be ready, the Reds can always DFA Hernandez without a huge loss. If Hernandez is decent, Mesoraco gets another year to polish his game. This is a good insurance move by the Reds. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |