![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,663
|
Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
Hat tip to the SunDeck:
http://network.yardbarker.com/mlb/ar...h_mets/3778439 Not sure how credible this is given it's listed as a blog. Leake or Bailey, Cordero, and Kris Negron for Reyes? Yes, please.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! Last edited by Benihana; 12-13-2010 at 05:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 9,266
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
I call BS on this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,039
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
Best rumor of the offseason imo.Health and an expiring contract might be the only issues here.Other then that, Reyes leading off and playing SS makes the Reds a much better team.He will be, if healthy, one of the top SS in the game.
I would have to imagine that the Mets could get some other teams interested if they're serious about dealing Reyes.I doubt any trade discussion with them will fly under the radar for too long if there's any truth to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,039
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 1,072
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
Terry Collins says 'ole Frankie is his 9th inning guy...i might believe it if it were 2 starters going their way
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,684
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
When I first saw this rumor on the SunDeck, I thought "awesome." However, I looked into the numbers, and just don't like what I see. He had a miserable 2010 with a .321 OBP in over 600 PAs. He can't take a walk and was injured for most of the 2009 season and his 2010 production showed a major drop off. He is making $11,000,000 next year and has had a negative UZR each of the last two years. I don't think I give up any of the young pitchers for Reyes and think I would rather use that hypothetical payroll space on Zach Greinke. I don't want the Reds to make a move for Jose Reyes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Battle Toad Historian
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,659
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
Outside of whether Reyes is worth the trade or not, a trade could work for both teams. Someone on here posted a proposal involving Cordero + chaff for the Mets. That makes the money even for both. I just read on the Cairo thread the Reds could have anywhere from 4-10MM left to spend this offseason. A trade of prospects could work with NY chipping in some $$ to cover some of the contract.
I doubt there is any truth to the rumor, but the Reds match up well with almost any team as a trade partner and they have some money to spend. However given the option, I'm with Edd in wanting Grienke over Reyes.
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,947
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
If anyone wants to see me speak ill of a Jocketty transaction, this is it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,553
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
Per Fay's Twitter:
Quote:
__________________
This will not change until the Reds win the World Series....... April 28, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,448
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
John Fay must read this site a LOT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Socratic Gadfly
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
Heard that before.
To me that means that it's about a 50/50 chance of happening.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,409
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
Greinke > Reyes
Reyes > Janish Going by WAR, Reyes was the 8th most productive SS in baseball last year. Its worth looking into. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
The Future is Now
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,899
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
This is what gives bloggers a bad name. Loses credibility. If you have something concrete and honest and you want to risk maybe making the club (and possibly your source) angry you run with it. But I can bet Fay (Mark Sheldon too) will never take anything serious again on "The Blog Red Machine".
I'd like to ask the blogger--who are these Reds "insiders" who have discussed the deal? I knew after reading sentence it was bogus. We could be the Reds insiders for all we know. Another Reds message board could be, etc. and so on.
__________________
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4 2013 Attendance Record: 5-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 9,084
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
Quote:
Maybe they know what they're talking about, maybe not. But you're not really in any position to judge that, as none of us are, since we don't know who they really are or who they know.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,474
|
Re: Reds discussing Jose Reyes?
I would love this. And not just because the Reds would win the yearly Salsa-dancing contest. Forget about finding a LF that can be the leadoff hitter. Getting Reyes would fill two voids: Leadoff hitter and starting shortstop. (I am not ready to make Janish the starting SS, but I think he's a solid backup.)
Course, that still leaves a ? in LF, but if the Reds gets Reyes, I might have to throw a party. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |