![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wheelersburg, Ohio
Posts: 874
|
Re: Excited about Bailey. Conflicted about Leake/Wood
All three guys have tremendous potential. Homer's big problem is that he was rushed to the major leagues - keep in mind he just turned 25.
If the Reds would have handled him like they handled Wood and some others in the organization - Homer would not have fallen out of favor so quickly, IMO. There are rules to the exception and maybe Leake falls into that category - but the former regime rushed Bailey and perhaps retarded his growth a bit. Homer has been slow to make adjustments and he has been bitten by the injury bug a bit. Leake and Wood are now faced with making adjustments - the jury is still out on how they will do. There is no question all three of them have things that we can be excited about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,666
|
Re: Excited about Bailey. Conflicted about Leake/Wood
I hope I am wrong, I hope Homer has the type of season the "experts" feel he can, i mean that would mean alot to this team and i fully understand that he is still young as he was a HS drafted player. He is given a tough first outing given how our offense is right now and facing the Stros Ace and having to be stuck with Edgar at SS, hopefully he can still do well with those negatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 3,079
|
Re: Excited about Bailey. Conflicted about Leake/Wood
Quote:
I agree, and will add I think Homers attitude (reportedly) held his progress back as well. I do still think he has potential and can do some great things, certainly wasnt implying otherwise.
__________________
UNC Tar Heels 2009 National Champions 5 time NCAA Champs 57, 82, 93, 05, 09 Go Heels!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond, KY
Posts: 972
|
Re: Excited about Bailey. Conflicted about Leake/Wood
Quote:
__________________
Rounding third and heading for home... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
WMFP Commish
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 579
|
Re: Excited about Bailey. Conflicted about Leake/Wood
Quote:
I'm not going to argue about Willis. He's pitched well enough in AAA to warrant a look to see if he's found something that he lost. It's a low-risk, high-reward proposition. If it fails, big deal - we cut him loose. We have the depth to support the experiment. If the Reds didn't think there was at least a shot that he'd regain his form, then they never would have invited him. If the Reds thought he was nothing more than an independent league pitcher, he wouldn't be stealing opportunities from other young pitchers. I'd like to see Chapman in the starting rotation at some point.I don't know that this is the year to move him. He has major control issues and until those are worked out, the Reds have too much talent in their rotation to mess with it.
__________________
A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no holes is a danish. -- Zen Philosopher Basho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wheelersburg, Ohio
Posts: 874
|
Re: Excited about Bailey. Conflicted about Leake/Wood
I agree with the attitude - alluded to that with being slow to make adjustments or take coaching. Seems to have matured. Hope for more outings like today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
WMFP Commish
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 579
|
Re: Excited about Bailey. Conflicted about Leake/Wood
Quote:
Someone mentioned the "microwave society" - it's a perfect term. People are so impatient these days - it's instant gratification or panic. Where I disagree with you is with Homer. Based on exactly what you said about Maddux (and you can exchange his name with many dozens of other current or former TOR pitchers), I fully believe this would be Homer's year to start to blossom. I would expect the best numbers of his career to register over the next 5 or 6 years, depending on health, but based on historical averages of other outstanding pitchers, this would be the year for Homer. I'm not claiming to be an "expert" - I'm just looking at the backs of baseball cards of others who have been in Bailey's position. I also don't have a Magic 8 Ball in front of me, so I can't guarantee anything. Sure, Homer could be a bust, but there's no way in hell I'm going to label him that this early in his career. Incidentally, I would have said (and did say) all of these things prior to his quality start today. High quality start, in fact...
__________________
A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no holes is a danish. -- Zen Philosopher Basho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Mr. Underhill
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester, KY
Posts: 441
|
Re: Excited about Bailey. Conflicted about Leake/Wood
Because when Bailey is on, like what I saw today (unfortunately, had to miss most of it), he looks absolutely unhittable. He has better stuff than either Wood or Leake; what he lacks is consistency. Last year, both his fastball and slider rated out as very good pitches (0.49 wFB/C and 1.03 wSL/C). Where he really struggled was with his splitter (-3.41 wSF/C, which is awful), and it wasn't from a lack of movement on the pitch, it was from a lack of location. It seemed like every time he had a bad outing, he was struggling to place his splitter, and if you leave a splitter up, it's going to get hit very hard. I don't have any data to back this up, so if someone has it to prove me wrong, please let me know and I will gladly rescind this statement, but it just seemed to me that his best outings came when he was featuring great control of his splitter. If he could ever find consistency in placing his splitter, I think we could be looking at a guy who regularly posts an FIP of right around 3.00 (3.74 last year, even struggling so much with his splitter). That may be a bit optimistic, but that's where I believe his ceiling lies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Mr. Underhill
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester, KY
Posts: 441
|
Re: Excited about Bailey. Conflicted about Leake/Wood
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |