![]() |
|
|
#181 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Big Bear City, CA
Posts: 361
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
Too many squandered opportunities, too many walks issued, batters failing to execute fundamentals, questionable decision making....plenty of blame to go around....either we get it straight VERY SOON, or we're done
|
|
|
|
|
|
#182 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,015
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
I do admire your loyalty to Dusty though....reminds me of my old dog who would follow me into a burning building.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#183 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 487
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
"Excellent" response. It's not about loyalty. It's about understanding the in and outs of the game (of which you clearly don't get) then determining what went wrong. If you watched tonight and still think the manager is to blame then you're clueless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#184 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Big Bear City, CA
Posts: 361
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
Too many games we should have won, but didn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#185 | |
|
malingered here too long
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,995
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
Quote:
That is on the "offense ain't our problem" manager, and on the GM, who continues to fiddle. Meanwhile, Cozart is now hitting .327. Last edited by malcontent; 06-11-2011 at 01:42 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#186 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 487
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
As much as I think that brm7675 is a fool (and believe me I think he is dumb as a rock), I might start to agree that some help is needed from Louisville at SS. Janish is completely clueless at the plate and Renteria can't be an everyday guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#187 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 34
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
I like dusty but should have never have pitched to tejada in 6th. That should have been his call. Lefty was on deck and one run lead in this ballpark is huge. Coco would have pitched 9th and arredondo has had control problems lately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#188 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,015
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
Quote:
Bray IS% 6% Ondrusek 39% (now 42%) I'm not even sure Dusty knows how to use the IS% stat...probably took him a while to understand what ERA was. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#189 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 487
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
Agree with this. Especially since the rookie lefty was on deck in that scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cuyahoga Falls Ohio
Posts: 745
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
would have rather lost in the 9th than in extras
|
|
|
|
|
|
#191 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 487
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#192 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Posts: 445
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
Another "I miss Arthur Rhodes" night
__________________
"...kicks and deals, and it's right down Broadway" 2009 Attendance Record 1-2 2010 Attendance Record 3-1 2011 Attendance Record 2-0 2012 Attendance Record 6-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#193 |
|
'19 '40 '75 '76 '90
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 782
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
SF broadcasters commented that Dusty acted surprised that Wood threw him a strike. They didn't show the video though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#194 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 6,940
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
|
|
|
|
|
|
#195 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,577
|
Re: 6-10-11 Reds @ Giants
If the old saying is true that a team is gonna win one third no matter what, lose a third no matter what, the Reds aren't doing all that well on the third that could go either way. This seemed like a could go either way type of game. Lincecum up next. That should be fun.
Walt needs to get reinforcements. I don't believe the team, as currently comprised, has enough to make the playoffs. Finally, how does a guy with the speed of Drew Stubbs not know how to bunt? Criminal. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |