![]() |
|
|
#256 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,062
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
Looking back the Big East really needed to do a couple things IMO. 1 Let the ACC take who they wanted to begin with. Outside of the mythical tv set stupidity what has/did Syracuse or BC add? Virginia Tech has been the ONLY thing keeping ACC relevant in football the last 5 years or so. 2 Everyone talks about adding tv sets but what has been SEC's motis operendi? Quality programs and quality on field teams. The Big East should have gone to at least 10 teams immediately after the raid. You were going to be dealing (tv wise) from a spot of weakness regardless so take some programs who put quality teams on the field and have pretty good upside in hopes they can add value to the next tv deal. Still add Louisville, USF, and Cincy (which got them back to 8) but also add at least 2 of TCU, Houston, ECU, or UCF. Each of those schools while not adding a lot to the immediate value of the Big East could have developed into something more with time and the recruiting resources of the aq. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 2,666
|
Re: College Football Realignment
http://www.footballrumormill.com/201...o-join-big-12/
I got this from the OSU scout board and the guy that posted it there is pretty reliable on these things. BYU, TCU, WVU, Louisville and the Bearcats to the Big 14. |
|
|
|
|
|
#258 | |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
Potentially really great news for UC, UofL and WVU fans around here. From what I'm able to piece together from the non-pay wall sites, there will be two 7-team divisions with three inter-division games each year. This works out rather elegantly, as UofL, UC and WVU slide in with Mizzou, Kansas, Kansas State and Iowa State to form the North/East division while Texas, Texas Tech, OU, Okie State, Baylor, TCU and BYU form the other half.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. Last edited by paintmered; 09-29-2011 at 06:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#259 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: College Football Realignment
If that happens, Texas and OU will not be in the same division.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#260 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Of course they will. Neither of those schools want to risk a rematch of the Red River Rivalry each year. Splitting OU and Texas makes sense for divisional balance but not for either of those schools.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#261 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: College Football Realignment
The North would be exceptionally weak compared to the South. I would think they would rather meet in Big 12 championship with an outside shot at BCS bowl even if you lose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#262 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: College Football Realignment
But that's kinda how it is now, yeah?
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#263 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: College Football Realignment
That would end all Missouri to the sec talk...thank goodness
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#264 | |
|
Ex-tixe
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Just past Mars
Posts: 4,470
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
I have to admit that it just seems like a weird amalgamation to me. Better than sticking in the Big East, but still kind of a pseudo-conference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#265 | |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,569
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#266 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,062
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
One question though anyone think that maybe O. Luck used some of his connections (IF WVU is in the SEC) to maybe get USF included in WVU's place? I would really hate to see USF left out because they've actually done quite well since moving to the Big East. If not USF's ONLY hope is the ACC and Fla State goes to the SEC. Rutgers and UConn or ND to the ACC to get it to 16. I don't see how the Big 10 can sit back and let everyone east of the rockies goto 16 without them doing anything but at this point looks like they're going to have to take "what's left".
__________________
Last edited by Slyder; 09-29-2011 at 10:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#267 |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football Realignment
In other news, Rick Pitino will be faxing in his resignation as Louisville head basketball coach.*
* Pitino has been extremely outspoken regarding UConn and other schools leaving the Big East, even comparing it to him leaving Kentucky for the NBA. If Louisville gives up playing in Manhattan NY to play in Manhattan KS, you will see Ricky Three Stacks hang it up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#268 |
|
15 game winner
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sultanes de Monterrey
Posts: 4,172
|
Re: College Football Realignment
If Ohio State and Michigan can be split into two different division and risk a rematch, so can Texas and Oklahoma.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#269 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,134
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Pitino thinks Temple and the service academies would make a good conference -- his priorities are clearly at odds with what's best for the football playing members of the Big East.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#270 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,037
|
Re: College Football Realignment
I think Pitino knows a move away from the Big East puts a big dent into his NYC recruting connections. He's successfully recruited many talented players from the NYC area during his time at Boston U, Providence, Kentucky & Louisville. Gonna be a lot tougher to pull them into the midwest when they don't get a return trip home 2-4 times a season to play games.
the question for Louisville, aside from the obvious ones in football, is what is better for their basketball program, playing regular games vs UConn, Georgetown, & Marquette, or regular games vs Texas, Kansas & Missouri. Seems like the later set (assuming the remaining conference games are fairly similar or identical depending on who moves with them) would be more prestigous in basketball. Losing Syracuse and Pitt really killed the eastern identity of Big East football. Of course in football, its a no brainer, matching up with Texas & Oklahoma beats anything in the current or future big east. Last edited by medford; 09-30-2011 at 02:46 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |