![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,109
|
Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
I guess I'll start it.
Woot for the Brewers losing!
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I'm back... and forth
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,604
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011
Can someone change the title to include Part II? Also, can we try to keep this one to its intended purpose? Gracias.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
#TheReturn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,659
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011
Aramis Ramirez just went yard off Brian Wilson to tie it at 1 in the ninth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cincinnati USA
Posts: 3,319
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011
The Reds have got a ton of mileage off the Brewers tough interleague schedule. Milwaukee went 2-7 vs. the Red Sox, Rays and Yanks combined. Hopefully the Twins can continue to dominate the Crew like they have in recent years when the games are played in Minny.
Go Twins! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 7,942
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011
Personally, I don't know what 'woot' means but if it means that the Cards lose, I'm a happy guy.
Rem |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,815
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
I hope this thread stays real active from here on out to the very end of the 2011 season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
Cardinals beat the Rays 5-3
Westbrook with 7 scoreless innings |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Time is the Revelator.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 7,276
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
![]() Brian Wilson not so great this year. This happened after he blew the game in the 8th @ Detroit. San Fran came back and won in the 9th, however.
__________________
Hide your power alleys; Hide your wife |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,638
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
That was one of the sorriest tantrums I've seen attempted. I'm surprised the bat didn't bounce back and hit him in the head after the weak swing at the water cooler. He needs to go to Zambrono's seminar in the offseason.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Time is the Revelator.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 7,276
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
Haha. Agreed. I was surprised the lid kind of popped off.
__________________
Hide your power alleys; Hide your wife |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,097
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 7,942
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,815
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
The Twins lead the Brewers 7-0 in the 4TH inning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cincinnati USA
Posts: 3,319
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
#TheReturn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,659
|
Re: Scoreboard Watching 2011 Part II
Brewers just came back from down 7-0 to take an 8-7 lead.
Cardinals are down 5-1. Pirates won game 1, and are down by 1 late in game 2. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |