![]() |
|
|
#121 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,616
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
Just sayin'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Seems quiet on the Carson Palmer front in here. Maybe he wasn't going to be awful for them afterall. I can't imagine Oakland fans are disappointed in the deal.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Fair enough MWM. He's been much better than I anticipated. Maybe the 1/2 year off refreshed him and getting into a situation where he was happier has helped motivate him. Still happier with the Bengals end of things though.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
#125 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,182
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
I obviously can't speak for every fan, but I haven't even really thought about Carson for the last few weeks. Dealing Carson provided the closure needed for most fans to focus on the team I believe. The Bengals are in the Playoff hunt and exceeding expectations by leaps and bounds. That is what has my interest now. I can't believe I am saying this, but it is a great time to be a Bengals fan IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 1,637
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
It may end up being a good deal for Oakland, but it was a phenomenal deal for the Bengals. It was pretty obvious Carson wasn't bluffing and was never going to play for them again. So, they basically got 1 first round pick and 1 first or second, but didn't have to actually give up anything.
That said, I'd rather the Bengals not make the playoffs than lose in the playoffs to the quitter. That would be awful to see a quitter be rewarded like that. |
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Don't get me wrong, I'm very happy with the deal and have gotten on the Dalton wagon. I'm happy to have him as the QB for the next several years. But there were a lot of people saying Carson wasn't any good anymore, especially after this first week and that this was a bad deal for Oakland and they were going to see very quickly.
I've always thought all the problems couldn't be on Carson, although he shared some of the blame. I didn't think Palmer went from being a borderline elite QB to forgetting how to be a good one altogether. I was a big believer that almost no QB could have been successful under Bratkowski the last few years. I thought if he was given a chance somewhere else he would show that he's still got plenty of skills. They haven't played world beaters yet, but to look as good as he has the last couple of weeks considering he's only had about a month, and that was mid-season, is impressive. I wouldn't at all be surprised to see a resurgent Carson Palmer the next couple of years. I don't think he'll get back to 2005 levels, but I think he'll be closer to that than 2010.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Plays The Right Way
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 796.357
Posts: 1,676
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Kimo von Oelhoffen made sure of that...............but [sarcasm] it wasn't on purpose [/sarcasm].
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,417
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Kyle Orton just got released by Denver.
Have to imagine Chicago and Houston will be all over him. The Raiders may have been too, had they not given up potentially TWO first round picks for Carson Palmer
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,702
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
That organization.... no one is sold on their current QB within the organization, so they cut the back up? Pure genius.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
#131 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,628
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Oh I'm not proclaiming him returned to his best. But there were those proclaiming very definitively that he was done, wasn't any good anymore, a bad QB. I think those were clearly immature. The guy was once a superb QB, and it wasn't that long ago. He didn't just forget how to do that.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
The trade demand might end up being the best thing for his elbow as it allowed him a lot more time to rest unlike in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
#134 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
Not sure how long it will last, but I'm guessing the extra time off and playing in a warmer climate will help. |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
Boller is garbage and Pryor still has a way to go before he should even be considered at #2. The Raiders have a ton of speed and if Palmers arm is healthy then hes a good fit for them since they like to run the ball and take shots deep. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |