RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2012, 02:57 PM   #1
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,427
Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

1 year deal
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 02-02-2012, 03:03 PM   #2
crazybob60
Member
 
crazybob60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brownsville, KY
Posts: 956
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

This give them a solid front four of Strasburg/Gio/Zimmerman/EJax and then either Lannan or Wang to round it out.

Their bullpen is solid and they have some really young, solid bats as well. If Stras stays healthy, they are still my prediction to win the NL East.
crazybob60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 03:21 PM   #3
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,619
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazybob60 View Post
This give them a solid front four of Strasburg/Gio/Zimmerman/EJax and then either Lannan or Wang to round it out.

Their bullpen is solid and they have some really young, solid bats as well. If Stras stays healthy, they are still my prediction to win the NL East.
Are they better than the Phillies, Braves, or Marlins? I would answer no/maybe/no.
bucksfan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 03:26 PM   #4
TRF
Vavasor
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,680
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Phillies.

No Howard, Utley on the decline, a much weaker offense than a few years ago. Great rotation.

Braves.

Offense is a little shaky, but with more potential than PHI, rotation might be a wash.

Marlins.

Very nice offense, but a weaker rotation.

Yeah, the Nats can contend.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar."
TRF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:09 PM   #5
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,427
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

I'm not sure if they are ready for this year, but I'd be surprised if the Nats aren't in contention for a while beginning in 2013- especially if the Phillies lose Hamels.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:11 PM   #6
RANDY IN INDY
Matt's Dad
 
RANDY IN INDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 14,504
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Solid pick up for the Nats. I think they will contend.
__________________
Talent is God Given: be humble.
Fame is man given: be thankful.
Conceit is self given: be careful.

John Wooden
RANDY IN INDY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:12 PM   #7
paulrichjr
Member
 
paulrichjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Savannah, TN
Posts: 2,775
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

One has to wonder if some of these teams regret some of the signings that were made early. Waiting seems to be the key this year to getting a very good deal (for the team). It is shocking how many one year deals are being done.
__________________
Tim McCarver: Baseball Quotes
I remember one time going out to the mound to talk with Bob Gibson. He told me to get back behind the batter, that the only thing I knew about pitching was that it was hard to hit.
paulrichjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:25 PM   #8
*BaseClogger*
WOOOOO!!!
 
*BaseClogger*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,078
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulrichjr View Post
One has to wonder if some of these teams regret some of the signings that were made early. Waiting seems to be the key this year to getting a very good deal (for the team). It is shocking how many one year deals are being done.
The Marlins have to feel kinda silly giving Bell 3/$27M and 4/$58M for Buehrle when they could have gotten Madson for 1/$8.5M and Jackson for what appears to be 1/$10M...
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."
*BaseClogger* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:37 PM   #9
Vottomatic
All work and no play.....
 
Vottomatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,820
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Nationals, Rays, Marlins, Blue Jays are all young and improving. Reds too.

Could be a changing of the guard in 2012.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic.

"Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread
Vottomatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 05:09 PM   #10
hebroncougar
Member
 
hebroncougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,017
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Gee. I wonder what happened to that 3 year deal Boras said somebody was offering...........
hebroncougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 09:01 PM   #11
LegallyMinded
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 331
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazybob60 View Post
This give them a solid front four of Strasburg/Gio/Zimmerman/EJax and then either Lannan or Wang to round it out.

Their bullpen is solid and they have some really young, solid bats as well. If Stras stays healthy, they are still my prediction to win the NL East.
Oliver projections, as reported on the front page of THT, have an interesting take on the NL East. They like the Braves to win the division, and the Nats to finish a full 10 games behind, in last place. They also have the Mets in front of the Phillies, which seems . . . unreasonable, to say the least.

Of course, I suppose I shouldn't complain about those projections too much, since they currently have the Reds tied for the most wins in baseball. Would 94 wins be too much to ask for?
LegallyMinded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 11:19 PM   #12
Edd Roush
Two-Time Batting Champ
 
Edd Roush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,639
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by LegallyMinded View Post
Oliver projections, as reported on the front page of THT, have an interesting take on the NL East. They like the Braves to win the division, and the Nats to finish a full 10 games behind, in last place. They also have the Mets in front of the Phillies, which seems . . . unreasonable, to say the least.

Of course, I suppose I shouldn't complain about those projections too much, since they currently have the Reds tied for the most wins in baseball. Would 94 wins be too much to ask for?
Wow, that's interesting. Other than David Wright, what is left in Flushing? Ike Davis? I just assumed the Mets would be fighting to win 70 games in that hellish division. Ahead of the Phillies? What am I missing?
Edd Roush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 12:28 AM   #13
*BaseClogger*
WOOOOO!!!
 
*BaseClogger*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,078
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

A healthy Johan Santana?
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."
*BaseClogger* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 09:21 AM   #14
LegallyMinded
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 331
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edd Roush View Post
Wow, that's interesting. Other than David Wright, what is left in Flushing? Ike Davis? I just assumed the Mets would be fighting to win 70 games in that hellish division. Ahead of the Phillies? What am I missing?
A healthy Ike Davis might one factor to consider for the Mets. He had a very good 2010, and was off to a great start in 2011 before getting hurt.

Regardless, however, the Cairo projections over at Replacement Level Yankees seem to say you're not missing anything. They have the Mets winning 74 games and finishing last in the East.

I find it encouraging, by the way, that these projections have the Reds winning the NL Central as well.
LegallyMinded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 09:43 AM   #15
crazybob60
Member
 
crazybob60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brownsville, KY
Posts: 956
Re: Nats Sign Edwin Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by LegallyMinded View Post
Oliver projections, as reported on the front page of THT, have an interesting take on the NL East. They like the Braves to win the division, and the Nats to finish a full 10 games behind, in last place. They also have the Mets in front of the Phillies, which seems . . . unreasonable, to say the least.

Of course, I suppose I shouldn't complain about those projections too much, since they currently have the Reds tied for the most wins in baseball. Would 94 wins be too much to ask for?
I guess we shall see how the season takes shape. I will stand by that projection as my NL East winner.
crazybob60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25