![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
|
Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
One Seeds
1. Kentucky 2. Syracuse 3. Duke 4. Kansas Two Seeds 1. Missouri 2. Ohio State 3. Michigan State 4. Baylor Three Seeds 1. Georgetown 2. Wisconsin 3. UNLV 4. Marquette Most difficult picks, IMO, are last two #1's and last two number threes. Your opinions?
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat." -- Christy Matthewson "Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot." -- Leo Durocher |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
Number Ones:
Kentucky Syracuse Missouri North Carolina Number Twos: Ohio State Kansas Duke Michigan State Number Threes: Baylor Marquette Georgetown Wisconsin How I would project each bracket: Boston: 1.Syracuse 2.Ohio State 3.Baylor Atlanta: 1.Kentucky 2.Duke 3.Georgetown Phoenix: 1.North Carolina 2.Kansas 3.Michigan St Louis: 1.Missouri 2.Michigan State 3.Marquette Matt Jones brought up a good point on KSR and I really think this will happen. If Duke ends up being a 2 seed, they will get matched up with Kentucky in Atlanta. 1. It's the 20th anniversary of the Laettner shot. 2. The Atlanta draw is Friday-Sunday, meaning CBS can play it as the final Elite Eight game before 60 minutes comes on. Imagine the ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
FEB 25th Missouri at Kansas should determine who gets the one between them. Also UNC plays at Duke March 3rd with revenge on their minds. But overall I think your really close to how it should play out.
On a side note, I find myself watching more college these days as the lockout killed the NBA.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,651
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
Conference tourneys always have an impact on seedings, even the top 4. I am looking at this way from a Buckeyes' perspective--they are a lock for a top 4 seed, if they are playing well they can beat anyone in the country no matter what seed they are, if they are still playing spotty like they are now, they'll bow out early again.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,261
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
Quote:
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,261
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
I will go with:
Atlanta Region: 1. Kentucky 2. Duke 3. Georgetown 4. Marquette Boston Region: 1. Syracuse 2. North Carolina 3. Baylor 4. Wisconsin St. Louis 1. Mizzou/Kansas 2. Michigan State/Ohio State 3. Florida 4. Louisville Phoenix 1. Michigan State/Ohio State 2. Kansas/Mizzou 3. Marquette 4. Florida State
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
Yeah, well, y'see....
Na, I got nothin'. Missed em.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat." -- Christy Matthewson "Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot." -- Leo Durocher |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,299
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
Lunardi had Michigan State as a #1 seed. They seem to be playing well right now so I can see this.
Looks like we might have some excellent #2 seeds : UNC-OSU-and Duke. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
As a Murray State alum, what do you prognosticators see for my Racers? Any chance they are a 4, or 5 or are they going to be relegated to an 11 seed like most 'mid-major' types?
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
All Fired Up
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
Quote:
http://beyondthearc.nbcsports.com/20...acket/related/ They are a dangerous team. This year's VCU?
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,299
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
Quote:
I heard someone (cant remember who) say when they were undefeated that if they run the table the would have been no worse than a #4. If they dont lose another, I can still see them with at least a #4 and an outside shot at a 3. The win against St Mary's helps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,556
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
Quote:
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,261
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
Quote:
![]() That's what I get for calling out Scrap for leaving out UNC.
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,651
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
They're so good, they're going to play in two regions.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
|
Re: Too Early to Discuss NCAA Seedings?
But if we add both our prognositications together, we've got one really strong WAG!
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat." -- Christy Matthewson "Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot." -- Leo Durocher |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |