![]() |
|
|
#241 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,430
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Kirkpatrick will be there when the Bengals pick but I don't really want him, especially not at 17.
The others might be gone. I'm hearing the Bengals really like Courtney Upshaw. I'd still love to take one of Barron/Floyd/DeCastro/Gilmore/Kuechly at 17 and then trade down out of 21- especially if Tannehill is on the board (Browns draft at 22, so presumably someone would want to trade up to that spot)
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#242 | |
|
OlafTheBlack
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 2,039
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Quote:
The trade I think would be Bengals 17 and a 5th rounder for Browns 22 and 2nd rounder this year and a 3rd rounder next year. That way they ensure they get their man.
__________________
Genius|Madness "Somebody will be bigger, stronger and faster than you, growing up," Griffey said with a shrug. "So why worry about it? As long as you don't let them outwork you, and you can look yourself in the mirror, then that's all you should worry about. Never worry about what somebody else is doing." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#243 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Quote:
The Bengals have 10 picks in this draft. The aren't going to keep 10 rookies on their 53 man roster to start the season. I think they would be in better shape to move up at some point in the draft. Get a guy you really want in teh 2nd or 3rd instead of keeping a 5th rounder that may be a longshot to make the team. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,118
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
A guy who is really growing on me is LSU WR Reuben Randell. I think he could come in and be a pretty productive #2 for us pretty quickly. Runs good routes, has good hands, just suffered from bad QB play.
I wouldn't cry if we took him at #21. My ideal situation however would be if we went something like Decastro - Kirkpatrick/Jenkins at 17 and 21, then trade back up to the top of the 2nd round with our extra picks to nab Randell in RD 2.
__________________
@#$% my @#$%^*& |
|
|
|
|
|
#245 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Quote:
If they trade down I want it to be for next year's draft. They currently are in a great position with 10 draft picks in this years draft, if you play it right you can continue to hold your great position in drafts, a la Pats. I wouldn't have a problem with them passing on a CB in the 1st and then moving early into the 2nd and picking Jenkins. If you could walk out of the 1st round with two of Glenn, Flyod, or DeCastro, a character flag in Jenkins is much more acceptable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#246 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,727
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247 | |
|
I hate the Cubs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,585
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Troubling
Joe Reedy @joereedy Quote:
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#248 |
|
Winning is fun.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 632
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
I'm starting to worry that Reedy is right and the Bengals will end up with Kirkpatrick and Upshaw in Round 1. Lombardi of the NFL Network also has Upshaw at 21 and says the Bengals might be the only team that has him with a 1st round grade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
There are too many draft pundits that really don't know what individual team needs. They also don't know who a team has rated high and who a team doesn't. I think with this draft the Bengals are a wild card because they really could go anywhere with the exception on QB. I also think that they have become more competent in drafting over the past few years, even more so with Lewis, Gruden, and Zimmer on the staff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#250 | |
|
Winning is fun.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 632
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#251 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,430
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Quote:
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,430
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Sadly, my final prediction is Kirkpatrick at 17 and either Upshaw or Glenn at 21. And I will be disappointed with that.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#253 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Quote:
That said I think this year could be a complete toss up. I think they will go BPA with every position except that of QB. And quite frankly I don't really have much of an issue with that. Too many judgements are made upon what happened most recently, and that has been a number of things without pads on. If they draft to fill a position of need then I won't have a problem with it. If Kirkpatrick is the pick I don't have a problem with it. If they go with an pass rusher, I don't have a problem with it. I remember how big of an impact their deep line was last year and how good they were late in the game when Dunlap was turned loose. Its scary to say this but if they draft a guy I feel fairly confident that Gruden or Zimmer will do a good job of using them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#254 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,430
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Quote:
Just saying. I have a lot less trust in them than you do.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#255 | |
|
I hate the Cubs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,585
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Quote:
Chris Perry should be the poster child for why you don't draft RB in the first round. You never know what you are going to get. He was pretty good in college. He worked out well, and then injuries caught up to him. He had been a bell cow, and there are only so many hits a RB should take. His 51 carry 219 yard effort against Michigan State in 2003, shows how much of a beating some of these guys take.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |