![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,666
|
Which 1/2 punch would you rather have..
Cards: Wainwright/Carpenter
Reds: Cueto/Latos Brewers: Greinke/Marcum |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
always ask questions
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: new jersey
Posts: 2,032
|
Re: Which 1/2 punch would you rather have..
I'd take Greinke/Gallardo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,576
|
Re: Which 1/2 punch would you rather have..
1) Greinke//Gallardo.
2) Latos//Cueto. 3) Wainwright//Carpenter.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 402
|
Re: Which 1/2 punch would you rather have..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 222
|
Re: Which 1/2 punch would you rather have..
If we're taking contract situation into account, then I'd prefer Latos and Cueto. If we're just talking about ability, I'd take Greinke and Gallardo since I don't really trust Cueto to reproduce last year's results and I think he'll continue to have some durability issues due to his small frame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Bozeman, MT
Posts: 313
|
Re: Which 1/2 punch would you rather have..
Gallardo/Greinke
Cueto/Latos Wainwright/Harpenter But consider last year. You would not have even considered this a serious question with Volquez/Wood starting games 1 and 2. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |