![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 139
|
I guess Lohse is not good enough
another player that somehow helps the cardinals while the reds stick with arroyo bailey and leake
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,453
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
Really? Do you remember Lohse's tenure here?
__________________
I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Retro-Gamer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,631
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
Lohse was horrible as a red
What we need is Dave Duncan btw Arroyo 2.70 has a ERA and Homer a 3.60 ERA |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,453
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
And Leake was our second best starter last year and had an excellent rookie year.
__________________
I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Manhattan, Kansas
Posts: 327
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
Even though he was not here when Dusty arrived, still gotta blame this on Dusty
Same goes for trading McRae to KC |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
What is the point of this thread? That we should have held onto lohse several years ago after looking into the future and seeing that he'd be good for the cards?
Sent from my HTC Rezound using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bridgetown
Posts: 1,416
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
here you go
http://www.redszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=95128 you cry when there here. beg them them to remove them. yrs later they figure it out then you say they gave up to early. o btw have you watched arroyo this yr? gtfo |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
We are back!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
Quote:
LOL!!!!!!! I had high hopes for Lohse when he was here. But just like in Minnesota, he didnt live up here either. The Cardinals seem to have the "pixie dust" method working pretty good. Sprinkle that stuff on other teams cast-offs and the next thing you know, they play like all-stars!!!!!!!!
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tn.
Posts: 773
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
Quote:
He's better now than he was, but don't all pitchers get better as they get smarter and longer in the tooth? And it doesn't hurt that he gets good run support either. BTW, in his 4 starts this year, Wainwright has had zero runs scored for him. All have come after he'd been lifted. So KL is not as good as you think, and AW not as bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 560
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
Quote:
__________________
I may not be fast, but I sure am slow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
This is the year
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: fairfield
Posts: 192
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
well i for one didnt agree with getting rid of Lohse back in the day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hell, aka Eastern Missouri.
Posts: 616
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
Lohse always pitches his fanny off in a contract year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,892
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,453
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
The Reds had first choice of Babe Ruth and they turned him down, that was on Dusty as well.
__________________
I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bridgetown
Posts: 1,416
|
Re: I guess Lohse is not good enough
he's 33 years old not like he's 25
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |