RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-11-2013, 11:22 PM   #1
Revering4Blue
All Fired Up
 
Revering4Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
March Madness 2013 discussion

It's that time again.

First things first, congrats to RichRed and Scrap Irony, as James Madison and Western Kentucky have punched tickets to the big dance.
__________________
Quote:
I have just been more than a little suspect of all the trades since the Willy (Scott Williamson) cash grab. That one left such a bad taste in my mouth that even a 1985 Dom Pérignon couldn't cleanse it.--Creek14
Revering4Blue is online now   Reply With Quote
Likes:
Razor Shines (03-11-2013), RichRed (03-12-2013)
Turn Off Ads?
Old 03-12-2013, 12:01 AM   #2
Chip R
Rally Onion!
 
Chip R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,221
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion

Not for 100 years.
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160
Chip R is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 12:05 AM   #3
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion

UK should have at least 25 championships by now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 12:07 AM   #4
Buckeye33
Member
 
Buckeye33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 2,410
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion

Lets see, I will be 134 years old when this thread becomes relevant. Mike Krzyzewski will be a robot by then and will still be manipulating refs to the enth degree.
__________________
Matta = Really good
Buckeye33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 12:13 AM   #5
Revering4Blue
All Fired Up
 
Revering4Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
Not for 100 years.
Proof positive that Senior moments can occur years ahead of time.

It's a good thing I'm not a CPA.

Mods, feel free to change the thread title.
__________________
Quote:
I have just been more than a little suspect of all the trades since the Willy (Scott Williamson) cash grab. That one left such a bad taste in my mouth that even a 1985 Dom Pérignon couldn't cleanse it.--Creek14
Revering4Blue is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 01:16 AM   #6
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion

Wright State/Valparaiso tomorrow, Horizon League tourney final. I know, I know...but it's my school.
__________________
Choo got it, dude.
Ohayou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 08:59 AM   #7
RichRed
My clutch is broken
 
RichRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 3,568
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revering4Blue View Post
It's that time again.

First things first, congrats to RichRed and Scrap Irony, as James Madison and Western Kentucky have punched tickets to the big dance.
Hey thanks, Rev! I drove the two hours to Richmond for the game and had an absolute blast. I'm a little hoarse and tired this morning at work but so happy for the kids on that team. We might be destined for a "First Four" matchup in Dayton but right now, I don't care. I was a young man of 25 the last time the Dukes were in the NCAA tourney (1994), so it's been a long wait, and it feels great!
__________________
"I can make all the stadiums rock."
-Air Supply
RichRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 09:10 AM   #8
Boston Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,945
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion

You'd have thought Northeastern would have learned from falling behind 28-4 to George Mason in the semifinals that it was important for them to come out firing on all cylinders. Then they did basically the same thing in the finals. Perhaps coming all the way back against Mason just left them with nothing in the tank.
Boston Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 09:27 AM   #9
RichRed
My clutch is broken
 
RichRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 3,568
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Red View Post
You'd have thought Northeastern would have learned from falling behind 28-4 to George Mason in the semifinals that it was important for them to come out firing on all cylinders. Then they did basically the same thing in the finals. Perhaps coming all the way back against Mason just left them with nothing in the tank.
Having seen that comeback against GMU, I was a nervous wreck almost until the final horn sounded. NU did manage to cut the lead to 8 at one point, so there was definitely an "Oh no, not again" feeling for a while there.
__________________
"I can make all the stadiums rock."
-Air Supply
RichRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 09:27 AM   #10
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,646
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revering4Blue View Post
Proof positive that Senior moments can occur years ahead of time.

It's a good thing I'm not a CPA.

Mods, feel free to change the thread title.
The CPA might do that just to cross up the IRS
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em
traderumor is offline   Reply With Quote
Likes:
Revering4Blue (03-12-2013)
Old 03-12-2013, 02:41 PM   #11
Cyclone792
Playoffs
 
Cyclone792's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion

Hoping UC makes the tourney at this point. They escaped USF, and ESPN thinks they're a lock but they need to beat Providence to ensure punching their ticket. Once in the tourney, they need to hit some of their 489 three pointers they fire up each game otherwise they'll be bounced early.

Nevertheless, when UC walks off the court for the final time I'll probably root for Miami (FL) the rest of the way, purely because of Larkin.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012

Put an end to the Lost Decade.
Cyclone792 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 08:17 PM   #12
jmac
part of BBN
 
jmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,297
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion

I have a feeling WKU will get an early tourney matchup with U of L.
Just my prediction
jmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 11:11 PM   #13
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion

Wow, Wright State. That was probably the ugliest final 5 minutes of a basketball game that I've ever seen.
__________________
Choo got it, dude.

Last edited by Ohayou; 03-12-2013 at 11:20 PM.
Ohayou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013, 03:09 PM   #14
Scrap Irony
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmac View Post
I have a feeling WKU will get an early tourney matchup with U of L.
Just my prediction
I'm guessing Indiana.

They've played Louisville already this year, and the NCAA is typically loathe to re-match schools in the same season.

WKU would provide the Hoosiers an opponent that requires little in the way of preparation and one that can't shoot straight.

It will also give me a chance to scream at the TV and act like a moron everytime Zeller pratfalls onto his face for another phantom foul on his opponent-- so that's a bonus.

Perhaps I can stroke out as WKU is leading early in the first half...
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
-- Christy Matthewson
"Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
-- Leo Durocher
Scrap Irony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013, 04:27 PM   #15
Revering4Blue
All Fired Up
 
Revering4Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
I'm guessing Indiana.

They've played Louisville already this year, and the NCAA is typically loathe to re-match schools in the same season.

WKU would provide the Hoosiers an opponent that requires little in the way of preparation and one that can't shoot straight.

It will also give me a chance to scream at the TV and act like a moron everytime Zeller pratfalls onto his face for another phantom foul on his opponent-- so that's a bonus.

Perhaps I can stroke out as WKU is leading early in the first half...
Just a hunch, Scrap, but I can see a Gonzaga/WKU first round matchup.

The reasoning:

* Two non-BCS schools with rich College B-Ball traditions/NCAA tourney success histories. It wasn't that long ago when nobody at all would have been surprised to see the aforementioned schools matched-up in the Sweet 16.

* For the simple reason that Gonzaga does not play in a BCS conference, they are perceived as the weakest #1 seed, not that I agree with this line of reasoning at all -- they are for real. But, given the fact that WKU was largely an injury-riddled team all year and are finally healthy and playing well, WKU profiles as the type of low seed capable of taking a heavy favorite down to the wire, with a chance to steal the game at the end.

If said match up were to materialize, I imagine that the record for viewership of a 1/16 match up would match or exceed the Georgetown/Princeton classic match up ratings of 1989.
__________________
Quote:
I have just been more than a little suspect of all the trades since the Willy (Scott Williamson) cash grab. That one left such a bad taste in my mouth that even a 1985 Dom Pérignon couldn't cleanse it.--Creek14
Revering4Blue is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25