![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
All Fired Up
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
|
March Madness 2013 discussion
It's that time again.
First things first, congrats to RichRed and Scrap Irony, as James Madison and Western Kentucky have punched tickets to the big dance.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Likes: | Razor Shines (03-11-2013), RichRed (03-12-2013) |
|
|
#2 |
|
Rally Onion!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,221
|
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion
Not for 100 years.
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion
UK should have at least 25 championships by now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 2,410
|
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion
Lets see, I will be 134 years old when this thread becomes relevant. Mike Krzyzewski will be a robot by then and will still be manipulating refs to the enth degree.
__________________
Matta = Really good |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
All Fired Up
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
|
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion
Proof positive that Senior moments can occur years ahead of time.
![]() It's a good thing I'm not a CPA. Mods, feel free to change the thread title.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
|
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion
Wright State/Valparaiso tomorrow, Horizon League tourney final. I know, I know...but it's my school.
__________________
Choo got it, dude. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
My clutch is broken
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 3,568
|
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion
Hey thanks, Rev! I drove the two hours to Richmond for the game and had an absolute blast. I'm a little hoarse and tired this morning at work but so happy for the kids on that team. We might be destined for a "First Four" matchup in Dayton but right now, I don't care. I was a young man of 25 the last time the Dukes were in the NCAA tourney (1994), so it's been a long wait, and it feels great!
__________________
"I can make all the stadiums rock." -Air Supply |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,945
|
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion
You'd have thought Northeastern would have learned from falling behind 28-4 to George Mason in the semifinals that it was important for them to come out firing on all cylinders. Then they did basically the same thing in the finals. Perhaps coming all the way back against Mason just left them with nothing in the tank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
My clutch is broken
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 3,568
|
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion
Quote:
__________________
"I can make all the stadiums rock." -Air Supply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,646
|
Re: March Madness 2113 discussion
Quote:
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
| Likes: | Revering4Blue (03-12-2013) |
|
|
#11 |
|
Playoffs
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
|
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion
Hoping UC makes the tourney at this point. They escaped USF, and ESPN thinks they're a lock but they need to beat Providence to ensure punching their ticket. Once in the tourney, they need to hit some of their 489 three pointers they fire up each game otherwise they'll be bounced early.
Nevertheless, when UC walks off the court for the final time I'll probably root for Miami (FL) the rest of the way, purely because of Larkin.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012 Put an end to the Lost Decade. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,297
|
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion
I have a feeling WKU will get an early tourney matchup with U of L.
Just my prediction
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
|
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion
Wow, Wright State. That was probably the ugliest final 5 minutes of a basketball game that I've ever seen.
__________________
Choo got it, dude. Last edited by Ohayou; 03-12-2013 at 11:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
|
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion
Quote:
They've played Louisville already this year, and the NCAA is typically loathe to re-match schools in the same season. WKU would provide the Hoosiers an opponent that requires little in the way of preparation and one that can't shoot straight. It will also give me a chance to scream at the TV and act like a moron everytime Zeller pratfalls onto his face for another phantom foul on his opponent-- so that's a bonus. Perhaps I can stroke out as WKU is leading early in the first half...
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat." -- Christy Matthewson "Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot." -- Leo Durocher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
All Fired Up
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
|
Re: March Madness 2013 discussion
Quote:
The reasoning: * Two non-BCS schools with rich College B-Ball traditions/NCAA tourney success histories. It wasn't that long ago when nobody at all would have been surprised to see the aforementioned schools matched-up in the Sweet 16. * For the simple reason that Gonzaga does not play in a BCS conference, they are perceived as the weakest #1 seed, not that I agree with this line of reasoning at all -- they are for real. But, given the fact that WKU was largely an injury-riddled team all year and are finally healthy and playing well, WKU profiles as the type of low seed capable of taking a heavy favorite down to the wire, with a chance to steal the game at the end. If said match up were to materialize, I imagine that the record for viewership of a 1/16 match up would match or exceed the Georgetown/Princeton classic match up ratings of 1989.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |