RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-18-2012, 02:06 PM   #1
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Would be a crazy Titanic of a blockbuster if true...

Nightingale reporting
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 07-18-2012, 02:26 PM   #2
_Sir_Charles_
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
 
_Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,414
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Would be a crazy "sinking titanic" of a "going out of business Blockbuster" if true...

Those are 3 horribly regressing players making WAAAAAY more than they should. A bad contract smorgasbord.
__________________
“If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant’s life, she will choose to save the infant’s life without even considering if there is a man on base.” —Dave Barry
_Sir_Charles_ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 02:34 PM   #3
Scrap Irony
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Love the deal for a myriad of reasons, the primary being it's a heck of a story.

Ramirez will help Boston's SS hole, Bell will help Boston's relief problems, and Crawford will help Miami's OF woes.

It's an outside the box deal that has a chance of helping both squads.

Would love to see other teams do the same type of thing-- dealing expensive sunk costs for other expensive sunk costs.

Nice thought, if true, by both GMs.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
-- Christy Matthewson
"Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
-- Leo Durocher
Scrap Irony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 02:35 PM   #4
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

I'd take HanRam if the Fish paid half his salary. No thanks to the other two.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 02:40 PM   #5
Dan
OlafTheBlack
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 2,039
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

MLBTR Update:

Quote:
1:10pm: There's no current discussion involving Crawford, Ramirez and Bell, ESPN.com's Buster Olney reports (on Twitter). The idea surfaced briefly as a concept and immediately died.
I'd put this on par with the Yankees and Red Sox agreeing to trade Williams for DiMaggio.
__________________
Genius|Madness

"Somebody will be bigger, stronger and faster than you, growing up," Griffey said with a shrug. "So why worry about it? As long as you don't let them outwork you, and you can look yourself in the mirror, then that's all you should worry about. Never worry about what somebody else is doing."
Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 02:49 PM   #6
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,336
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Love the deal for a myriad of reasons, the primary being it's a heck of a story.

Ramirez will help Boston's SS hole, Bell will help Boston's relief problems, and Crawford will help Miami's OF woes.

It's an outside the box deal that has a chance of helping both squads.

Would love to see other teams do the same type of thing-- dealing expensive sunk costs for other expensive sunk costs.

Nice thought, if true, by both GMs.
By pouring the gasoline or lighting the match?
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 02:56 PM   #7
Homer Bailey
I'm back... and forth
 
Homer Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,612
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Olney has already shut this rumor down.
Homer Bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 03:13 PM   #8
MikeS21
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,653
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Here we go with the rumors again. I always wonder where these guys get their "inside information." But even more, I wonder why "inside information" that is legitimate gets "leaked." Baseball executives and FO insiders have to be playing some kind of an angle if they are going to go blab to a writer about potential and actual deals. Find the angle and it will bring you closer to the truth.
__________________
Opinions are like belly buttons. Everybody has one, and they don't want someone else's shoved into their face.
MikeS21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 03:16 PM   #9
Scrap Irony
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benihana View Post
I'd take HanRam if the Fish paid half his salary.
How about Ramirez for Arroyo, with the Fish paying the difference in salaries and the Reds throwing in Sulbaran? (In my hypothetical, Arroyo says yes to the deal, as he has 5/10 rights.)
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
-- Christy Matthewson
"Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
-- Leo Durocher
Scrap Irony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 03:50 PM   #10
REDREAD
Where's my chair?
 
REDREAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,807
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
How about Ramirez for Arroyo, with the Fish paying the difference in salaries and the Reds throwing in Sulbaran? (In my hypothetical, Arroyo says yes to the deal, as he has 5/10 rights.)
We really can't trade anyone from the rotation unless we get a starter back.

If the team is forced to put Redmond, LeCure, or someone like that in the rotation for an extended period of time, we're in big trouble.
Simon might be able to handle it, but why risk it? He seems like the classic case of a failed starter who can handle the bullpen.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013!

Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
REDREAD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 03:57 PM   #11
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,940
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

The Reds should ship Sean Casey to Florida for Crawford.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 03:57 PM   #12
RedlegJake
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 3,867
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

For all we know Redmond might be as good as Arroyo. He needs to get a start or two to find out anything though. He sounds a bit like Leake, his control, his stuff. I think it would be worth it if there was a trade that could get us out from under Arroyo's 2013 contract although the accelerated deferrment payments would still be a problem.
RedlegJake is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 04:12 PM   #13
_Sir_Charles_
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
 
_Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,414
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Quote:
Originally Posted by blumj View Post
By pouring the gasoline or lighting the match?
Exactly. This whole speculated deal is much ado about nothing. None of the 3 players have looked even remotely good recently (I'm not going to count the couple of games Crawford's played). They're big names and big contracts...and big flops.
__________________
“If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant’s life, she will choose to save the infant’s life without even considering if there is a man on base.” —Dave Barry
_Sir_Charles_ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 04:55 PM   #14
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,748
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Bell will help Boston's relief problems......

Unless Boston's problem is that thier relievers are too effective, Bell won't be much help.....
PuffyPig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 05:19 PM   #15
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,336
Re: Crawford for HanRam and Bell Rumor

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
Unless Boston's problem is that thier relievers are too effective, Bell won't be much help.....
Actually, that is one of their problems, their relievers keep showing up the starters by getting opposing batters out.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25