RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2012, 11:15 PM   #721
BuckeyeRedleg
Will post for food
 
BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,088
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

One down. Two to go.

Wow. This team should be at least 10-4.
BuckeyeRedleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 12-13-2012, 11:18 PM   #722
Roy Tucker
Be the ball
 
Roy Tucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,120
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Boy, did this game turn around. Eagles self-destruct.
__________________

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit."
Roy Tucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 11:30 PM   #723
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

A win is a win, and this one somehow turned into a blowout.

Good deal.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 11:34 PM   #724
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,696
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckeyeRedleg View Post
I'm struggling here. What's the common theme since the 2nd half of the Cowboy game thru tonight?

The return of Kyle Cook?

Why is the OL getting burned so bad by this 4 man rush? Wacky.
Guys not quite getting open is part of the problem. The Eagles have some stud linemen.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 12:23 AM   #725
New York Red
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,231
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

What a laughable game. This team has the talent to be 10-4, but the coaching to be 7-7.
__________________
"I talked to an advance scout that told me if Joey Votto and Albert Pujols were on the same team he'd advise his team to do the unthinkable...pitch around Votto to get to Pujols." - Buster Olney, ESPN
New York Red is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 12:35 AM   #726
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by New York Red View Post
What a laughable game. This team has the talent to be 10-4, but the coaching to be 7-7.
I dunno if we're that talented. I think we're getting a lot out of guys who weren't supposed to be this good.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 12:36 AM   #727
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,928
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by New York Red View Post
What a laughable game. This team has the talent to be 10-4, but the coaching to be 7-7.
No one seemed to believe they had the talent to be 10-4 early in the season. In fact, pretty much all I saw here was doomsday prophecies about this team.

They very easily could be 10-4, but to be where they're at with a lot of holes on the roster seems fair.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 02:42 AM   #728
Redsfaithful
A Little to the Left
 
Redsfaithful's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Unbelievable they went from 3-5 to 8-6. That is just so un-Bengal like.

I kept reminded myself during the game that you can't make any conclusions from a four day turnaround game on the road. I think it makes for a sloppy football game, and the Eagles emphasized that pretty well.

Things that do concern me though:

- I do not like rotating centers every two series. I'm guessing they'll keep doing it, but I don't think it is helping things.

- Losing Chris Pressley sucks so much. I hope they pick up a fullback and don't just use Brian Leonard or a tight end.

- Something is up with Clint Boling. Illness or injury or something. You don't go from being invisible all year because you're doing your job fine to this noticeable overnight without something going wrong I don't think.

- The Bengals have no receivers getting open other than Green right now, which isn't helping Andy Dalton. Sanu was the answer to that and they badly need someone else to step up now.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
--Oscar Wilde
Redsfaithful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 08:51 AM   #729
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,611
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

The Bengals won a sloppy game in convincing fashion. The defense gave up 13 points, 6 of them when the Eagles were handed the ball in FG range. What I find annoying is a lot of national pundits, Mike Mayock and Stink are blasting the Bengals for playing a poor game. My question to them is, how often are Thursday night games good games? Your body just starts to feel better. Players who would be held out of practice that day are forced to play. Its was a stupid idea by the NFL to market their network and make more money. When college teams play a Thursday night game they have at least one more day of rest and often the team has a bye the week before.

The Good:
The defense, AJ Green, BJGE
The Bad:
Andy Dalton, the OLine
The Ugly:
Ben Tate, the other WR's.
bucksfan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 09:14 AM   #730
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
What I find annoying is a lot of national pundits, Mike Mayock and Stink are blasting the Bengals for playing a poor game.
Well the Colts sure didn't look like a playoff team when they got demolished by the Patriots, and when Pittsburgh was fumbling the ball all over the place against the Browns they weren't a playoff team either. If we are gonna take heat for a 21 point win during a short week on the road I'll gladly take it

Our biggest problem was protection. Dalton didn't play well, but we didn't do him any favors either. Our O-Line has been playing so well that I don't think it's a trend, just a bad game. Apparently Whit was sick? Andre Smith wasn't Andre Smith...heck even Zeitler was noticeably bad. I don't think it's a problem going forward, well I hope not.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 09:18 AM   #731
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

One other observation. Does Gresham getting a holding penalty every game? It feels like it. I'd be curious to know how many he's had so far this year.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 09:28 AM   #732
Tony Cloninger
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,097
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stray View Post
Well the Colts sure didn't look like a playoff team when they got demolished by the Patriots, and when Pittsburgh was fumbling the ball all over the place against the Browns they weren't a playoff team either. If we are gonna take heat for a 21 point win during a short week on the road I'll gladly take it

Our biggest problem was protection. Dalton didn't play well, but we didn't do him any favors either. Our O-Line has been playing so well that I don't think it's a trend, just a bad game. Apparently Whit was sick? Andre Smith wasn't Andre Smith...heck even Zeitler was noticeably bad. I don't think it's a problem going forward, well I hope not.


Messenger Centers? Who's Wicky Wacky idea was this? I mean I did not like messenger Guards when Paul Brown did it but he was Paul Brown. I mean how can you mess with the chemistry at the heart of the line basically, with Robinson was playing well to fit in someone who is not ready.
Tony Cloninger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 09:30 AM   #733
Tony Cloninger
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,097
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus View Post
No one seemed to believe they had the talent to be 10-4 early in the season. In fact, pretty much all I saw here was doomsday prophecies about this team.

They very easily could be 10-4, but to be where they're at with a lot of holes on the roster seems fair.
I thought they would beat Miami and Cleveland (twice) but lose in SD and in Philly. Did not expect those 2 teams to have such bad years.
Tony Cloninger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 09:42 AM   #734
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,638
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
The Bengals won a sloppy game in convincing fashion. The defense gave up 13 points, 6 of them when the Eagles were handed the ball in FG range. What I find annoying is a lot of national pundits, Mike Mayock and Stink are blasting the Bengals for playing a poor game. My question to them is, how often are Thursday night games good games? Your body just starts to feel better. Players who would be held out of practice that day are forced to play. Its was a stupid idea by the NFL to market their network and make more money. When college teams play a Thursday night game they have at least one more day of rest and often the team has a bye the week before.

The Good:
The defense, AJ Green, BJGE
The Bad:
Andy Dalton, the OLine
The Ugly:
Ben Tate, the other WR's.
Oh my goodness, Mayock was unbearable. His defense of his draft guru miss on Burfict--"no one drafted him, therefore my 'he's undraftable' was correct." Or, all the teams AND you were incorrect. He would have been a good draft pick and the team that picked him would have looked like geniuses if they had done so.

He made me miss Dan Dierdorf---well almost.

With that said, the last two games have shown that a smart betting man wouldn't bet on the NFL. The Bengals play decent against the Cowboys, lose on two 4th qtr drives. They stink up the joint for half the game last night, win by 21.
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em

Last edited by traderumor; 12-14-2012 at 09:45 AM.
traderumor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 10:30 AM   #735
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,638
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stray View Post
Well the Colts sure didn't look like a playoff team when they got demolished by the Patriots, and when Pittsburgh was fumbling the ball all over the place against the Browns they weren't a playoff team either. If we are gonna take heat for a 21 point win during a short week on the road I'll gladly take it

Our biggest problem was protection. Dalton didn't play well, but we didn't do him any favors either. Our O-Line has been playing so well that I don't think it's a trend, just a bad game. Apparently Whit was sick? Andre Smith wasn't Andre Smith...heck even Zeitler was noticeably bad. I don't think it's a problem going forward, well I hope not.
The O-line performance, I'm guessing that the Eagles line either had a trick up their sleeve or it was just a bad matchup. It was too bad to be that the Oline suddenly stinks.
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em
traderumor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25