![]() |
|
|
#721 |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,088
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
One down. Two to go.
Wow. This team should be at least 10-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
#722 |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,120
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Boy, did this game turn around. Eagles self-destruct.
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." |
|
|
|
|
|
#723 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
A win is a win, and this one somehow turned into a blowout.
Good deal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#724 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,696
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Guys not quite getting open is part of the problem. The Eagles have some stud linemen.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#725 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,231
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
What a laughable game. This team has the talent to be 10-4, but the coaching to be 7-7.
__________________
"I talked to an advance scout that told me if Joey Votto and Albert Pujols were on the same team he'd advise his team to do the unthinkable...pitch around Votto to get to Pujols." - Buster Olney, ESPN |
|
|
|
|
|
#726 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#727 | |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,928
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
They very easily could be 10-4, but to be where they're at with a lot of holes on the roster seems fair.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#728 |
|
A Little to the Left
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Unbelievable they went from 3-5 to 8-6. That is just so un-Bengal like.
I kept reminded myself during the game that you can't make any conclusions from a four day turnaround game on the road. I think it makes for a sloppy football game, and the Eagles emphasized that pretty well. Things that do concern me though: - I do not like rotating centers every two series. I'm guessing they'll keep doing it, but I don't think it is helping things. - Losing Chris Pressley sucks so much. I hope they pick up a fullback and don't just use Brian Leonard or a tight end. - Something is up with Clint Boling. Illness or injury or something. You don't go from being invisible all year because you're doing your job fine to this noticeable overnight without something going wrong I don't think. - The Bengals have no receivers getting open other than Green right now, which isn't helping Andy Dalton. Sanu was the answer to that and they badly need someone else to step up now.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. --Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
|
#729 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,611
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
The Bengals won a sloppy game in convincing fashion. The defense gave up 13 points, 6 of them when the Eagles were handed the ball in FG range. What I find annoying is a lot of national pundits, Mike Mayock and Stink are blasting the Bengals for playing a poor game. My question to them is, how often are Thursday night games good games? Your body just starts to feel better. Players who would be held out of practice that day are forced to play. Its was a stupid idea by the NFL to market their network and make more money. When college teams play a Thursday night game they have at least one more day of rest and often the team has a bye the week before.
The Good: The defense, AJ Green, BJGE The Bad: Andy Dalton, the OLine The Ugly: Ben Tate, the other WR's. |
|
|
|
|
|
#730 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
Our biggest problem was protection. Dalton didn't play well, but we didn't do him any favors either. Our O-Line has been playing so well that I don't think it's a trend, just a bad game. Apparently Whit was sick? Andre Smith wasn't Andre Smith...heck even Zeitler was noticeably bad. I don't think it's a problem going forward, well I hope not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#731 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
One other observation. Does Gresham getting a holding penalty every game? It feels like it. I'd be curious to know how many he's had so far this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#732 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,097
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
Messenger Centers? Who's Wicky Wacky idea was this? I mean I did not like messenger Guards when Paul Brown did it but he was Paul Brown. I mean how can you mess with the chemistry at the heart of the line basically, with Robinson was playing well to fit in someone who is not ready. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#733 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,097
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
I thought they would beat Miami and Cleveland (twice) but lose in SD and in Philly. Did not expect those 2 teams to have such bad years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#734 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,638
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
He made me miss Dan Dierdorf---well almost. With that said, the last two games have shown that a smart betting man wouldn't bet on the NFL. The Bengals play decent against the Cowboys, lose on two 4th qtr drives. They stink up the joint for half the game last night, win by 21.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em Last edited by traderumor; 12-14-2012 at 09:45 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#735 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,638
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |