![]() |
|
|
#676 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,084
|
Say it how you want....but they are still MLB players adequate enough to be manning the position. I'm 38 and 30 lbs overweight....but might've made that play from his positioning. Me making it would be a little lucky....Craig making it was just a pretty good play guys on tv make.
|
|
|
|
|
#677 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
Statistically he's one of the worst 1B in the majors, he makes the play maybe 2 out of 10 times so getting one of them that spot was a blessing when guys like Adrian Gonzalez don't come up with it on the regular.
|
|
|
|
|
#678 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 213
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#679 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,084
|
He wasn't fully extended at all and you have to be blinded to think he gets that 2/10 times. How many times does Adam Dunn make that play?
|
|
|
|
|
#680 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#681 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 213
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
Quote:
It's a sad existence when you are incapable of saying "that team on the other side played well.". All you can do is spout off about luck and meaningless stats. |
|
|
|
|
|
#682 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 254
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
Statistically, he hasn't logged even close to the amount playing time at 1B for any data to have significance.
|
|
|
|
|
#683 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
Less than Craig but they both are DH, just one has to play the field since he plays in the NL. He was a -3 run saved this year in lust under 775 innings, with guys with that many innings only 5 guys had worse - runs saves 3 of those players had 2 or less more than Craig while playing over 33% more innings. So Just Hart -5 in 849.1 and Konerko -11 in 886.0 had worse.
|
|
|
|
|
#684 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
|
|
|
|
|
#685 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
|
|
|
|
|
#686 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 213
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
Quote:
You throw out stats as to why something shouldn't have happened, but it did. You then refuse to give credit for good play because you feel it was all luck. Using your logic, there are no good performances, just luck. Boy those Giants sure are lucky their bats accidentally hit the ball. Luck... |
|
|
|
|
|
#687 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 254
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
He was drafted as a SS out of college, converted to 3b and then OF because of Pujols. He's not a great defender by any means, but he's some lumbering oaf either. Pretty standard first baseman.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#688 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,084
|
Quote:
Craig making that play just can't be that bothersome.....it wasn't that great of a play. Now if he's fully extended in air snagging a bad-hop it another thing....but that was as about as routine as a diving play you can make. |
|
|
|
|
|
#689 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tn.
Posts: 773
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
Still a ballgame going on fellas....getting to crunch time.
|
|
|
|
|
#690 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 213
|
Re: Postseason Scoreboard Watching
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |