![]() |
|
|
#691 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Grove City, Ohio
Posts: 1,385
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
Why couldn't we have got that the batter before???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#692 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,838
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
First run scored on a HBP, BB and sacrifices.
Second run scored on a passed ball and error. Kind of upsetting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#693 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,737
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
#694 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Bozeman, MT
Posts: 310
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
I don't understand why you don't walk that batter to force the Giants to use their last bat off the bench. First mistake Dusty has made in the playoffs, but that was an easy choice to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#695 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Albany, OH
Posts: 7,200
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
All avoidable. Now we need serious heroics that makes baseball lore to win.
__________________
Did you like that? |
|
|
|
|
|
#696 |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,413
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
You guys are bigger men than I am. I want to curl up in a ball and give up. Just unbelievably soul crushing for me.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
#697 |
|
Posting from Southwest VA
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 669
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
Pretty dumb not to walk Arias. Sanchez isn't going to get an infield hit plus if he gets a legit hit, the Reds have gotten Romo out of the game. It just doesn't make much sense to me.
__________________
This is the ol Left Hander rounding third and heading for home. |
|
|
|
|
|
#698 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,737
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
Becuase you chance of giving up a run increases dramatically with a walk in play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#699 |
|
#TheReturn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,669
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
Why was it dumb not to walk Arias? Because the third baseman booted a ground ball?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#700 |
|
Lime in da Coconut
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Rainelle, WV
Posts: 7,712
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
Dang passed ball. Dang. 1 hit allowed through 9 and then this. Like Tom, I'm not taking it well at all.
__________________
www.ris-news.com "The price of seeking to force our beliefs on others is that someday they might force their beliefs on us." Mario Cuomo "You only have to bat a thousand in two things; flying and heart transplants. Everything else you can go 4-for-5." -Beano Cook |
|
|
|
|
|
#701 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,838
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
Quote:
Don't see how walking him would have helped, except if your goal is to get Romo out of the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#702 |
|
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,402
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
Guys, PuffyPig is spot on. You don't walk a guy there.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#703 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,737
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
#704 |
|
Posting from Southwest VA
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 669
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
Walking him eliminates getting beat on a weak ground ball.
__________________
This is the ol Left Hander rounding third and heading for home. |
|
|
|
|
|
#705 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Albany, OH
Posts: 7,200
|
Re: NLDS Game 3 - Giants at Reds 10/9/12
Get Romo out and a force out to any base.
__________________
Did you like that? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |